future-related stories
Posted Jan 7th 2009 1:03PM by Jay Black
Filed under: Industry, OpEd, Web, TV 101, Reality-Free

Seeing as this is the new year and all, I figured today's column would concentrate on the future. My original plan was to write extensively about what television will become following the detonation of the
Yellowstone supervolcano --
who's ready for static?! -- but in the spirit of Hope (tm), I scratched that in favor of something a bit more positive.
My guess is that the numbers break down this way: 90% of you have no idea at all who Leo Laporte is, 7% kinda sorta remember him from the ill-fated ZDNET cable channel, and 2% of you are TWitTs like me. (The other one percent? Spambots worried about my "girth").
It's time to get to know Leo, because over the last year he has single-handedly created a brand-new paradigm for how TV is going to be viewed on the net ... kinda.
Continue reading TV 101: Why Leo Laporte represents the future of TV (kinda) - VIDEO
Posted Oct 21st 2008 11:35AM by Allison Waldman
Filed under: Pickups and Renewals, Reality-Free, Mad Men

As Bob wrote the other day, AMC has given the Emmy-award winning drama series
Mad Men a pick up for a third season. No shock, but that future will be greatly dependent on re-signing Matthew Weiner to continue as the show's creator. Imagining
Mad Men without Weiner at the helm is like Sterling Cooper without Don Draper as creative director!
However, while we're waiting to hear that Weiner's signed on the dotted line, the news today has me even more nervous.
Jon Hamm and John Slattery have yet to renegotiate their contracts, which means the stars of
Mad Men could be done with next week's season finale.
I don't believe that's going to happen, but Roger Friedman floated the possibility out there. He even suggests that Jon Hamm's star has risen so high, so fast that he could be the next George Clooney. Clooney, you'll remember, parlayed a few seasons of
ER into a movie career (although there was more to it than that).
Continue reading Is the future of Mad Men in doubt?
Posted Sep 3rd 2008 2:02PM by Allison Waldman
Filed under: Late Night, Celebrities, Talk Show, Reality-Free

While
NBC is carefully plotting Jay Leno's exit from
The Tonight Show,
David Letterman is talking about staying on the CBS Late Show beyond 2010. And since the subject of Leno came up, Dave thinks the guys at NBC are nuts to treat Jay the way they are, especially since he's done such a great job in the 11:30 slot.
Letterman even said he wants Jay on his show the day after his Tonight Show tenure ends.
Letterman, who was once the heir apparent to Johnny Carson's desk but was passed over in favor of Leno, has thrived on CBS even though he was crushed to lose
The Tonight Show. The supposed feud between Letterman and Leno, and their competition for
The Tonight Show, was depicted in the HBO film (and Bill Carter book)
The Late Shift. (If you've never seen it, buy or rent it; it's one of the best films ever about how TV works behind the scenes.)
Continue reading Letterman speaks up for Leno
Posted May 10th 2007 4:20PM by Adam Finley
Filed under: Industry, TV on the Bigscreen, Animation, Celebrities
Despite what Best Week Ever says, Grindhouse co-director Robert Rodriguez is not directing a live-action version of the popular Hanna-Barbera cartoon The Jetsons. He was, however, shown the script and says he might be interested in it. This is just one of many projects being offered to him, so it remains to be seen if we'll be seeing a Rodriguez-directed film with the likes of George, Jane, Judy, Elroy, Astro, Rosie, Mr. Spacely, Mr. Cogswell and Orbity, the Scrappy-Doo of the Jetson's universe (and I liked both characters, I'm just saying they were polarizing).
Continue reading A live-action Jetsons movie (maybe)
Posted Jan 28th 2007 9:03AM by Adam Finley
Filed under: Discovery
Tonight starting at 8:00pm, the Discovery Channel will look fifty years into the future with a three-part series called 2057. The series will mix speculation from leading scientists with dramatic storytelling to try and envision how our world will change over the next few decades. One of the questions, of course, is whether or not we'll have flying cars, and more importantly, will Martian hookers be both plentiful and affordable? Okay, the second one is my own personal preference, but I think it's worth looking into.
The first part of the series, "The Body" airs at 8:00pm and looks at modern technology and what it holds for human health and longevity in the future: things like robotic surgery and custom-built organs. At 9:00pm, "The City," the second part in the series, will look at advances in robotics, automobiles and surveillance systems. Finally, at 10:00pm, "The World" will examine how technology will help transfer more information even faster than before, and the possibilities of space travel for average folks like us.
You can watch clips from the series here.
Posted Jan 9th 2007 1:02PM by Adam Finley
Filed under: News, PBS
Tonight at 8pm on PBS, NOVA scienceNow will look at a competition to build an "elevator to space." Participants will compete to see whose prototype can go the highest, and the winner takes home a $150,000 prize. The episode will also focus on scientific research surrounding the carbon nanotube, a stronger-than-steel material that just might be used to create the cable for a real "space elevator" in the future. It would be awesome if such a thing were constructed in my lifetime, though with my luck I'd be stuck on this lengthy elevator ride with some guy who just polished off a beef and bean burrito.
Other segments from the episode will include research into "longevity genes" and how they may hold the secret to living longer; using satellites to uncover Mayan ruins; and studies in "Quorum Sensing," the way bacteria communicates.
Posted Nov 2nd 2006 11:16AM by Adam Finley
Filed under: OpEd, Animation, South Park, Comedy Central
(S10E12)
Mrs. Garrison: Pound my monkey hole, Richard!
I figured Matt and Trey would at least lean toward the side of evolution in this episode, and they did, but it was really about how we tend to oversimplify things. Mr. Garrison reluctantly teaches evolution, telling the kids they're basically all "retarded fish squirrels," the product of a millenia's worth of inter-species butt sex. Later, author and atheist Richard Dawkins automatically turns Garrison into an atheist by telling him that a flying spaghetti monster is as likely to exist as God because you can't disprove either.
Continue reading South Park: Go, God, Go! Part II
Posted Aug 25th 2006 9:05AM by Adam Finley
Filed under: FOX, OpEd, The Simpsons, Animation, Retro Squad
(S06E19)
Marge: FOX turned into a hardcore sex channel so gradually I never noticed.
Following an episode I wasn't that thrilled with comes another that's filed in my brain under "Meh." Episodes that show the family in the future always turn me off, and I'm not sure exactly why that is. Maybe I'm just not willing to accept Bart and Lisa as young adults and Homer and Marge as an old couple.
This episode begins with the family at a carnival, and Lisa wanders into a tent featuring bizarre animals, such as a chicken wearing a rainbow wig, a one-headed dog, and an esquilax, a horse with the head of a rabbit, and the body of a rabbit. The rabbit --sorry, esquilax-- escapes, and Lisa chases after it, winding up in a tent with a fortune teller. The first tarot card she places down is the Death card, which frightens Lisa, but the Death card is actually good, it's the Happy Squirrel card she needs to be concerned about.
Continue reading The Simpsons: Lisa's Wedding
Posted Jan 21st 2006 8:48AM by Anna Johns
Filed under: Other Sci-Fi/Supernatural Shows, ABC, Lost

What does this mean? During last week's episode,
Hunting Party, one of Jack's flashbacks shows him looking
at an X-ray of his patient's back. The date on that X-ray: November 16, 2005. Huh??? The detail-oriented folks over at
Lost-Media
caught the date, which can only been seen if you have HDTV.
Was this an oversight on the part of the
directors? It's entirely possible that the x-ray was made in November for a January airing. But, nothing ever seems
accidental on
Lost. We don't actually know when
Lost happens and this X-ray suggests that it's in the
future. How far into the future? Well, far enough for Jack to get himself quite a
collection of tattoos.
Thoughts?
[Thanks to Scott F., who listens to my
podcast!]
Posted Jan 1st 2006 10:25AM by Keith McDuffee
Filed under: OpEd, Site Announcements, The Five, Web
(Part 5 of 5)
We have no shame in capping our list off with one of
our favorite happenings in TV being the launch of our beloved site. Hey, put it this way -- at least you won't have to
hear us boast about it again until our birthday.
In case you're not familiar with who TV Squad is, we are
one weblog of many within what is known as
Weblogs, Inc. As happens with some
of the sites within what we call WIN, writing for TV Squad began a bit earlier than the official launch to the public.
The first post dates back to a
review for an episode of Battlester Galactica, written by original lead editor, Dave Thomas. Not a bad
show to start off with, if I do say so myself. Dave has since moved onto bigger and better things in the writing
world.
Continue reading Top TV stories of 2005: The debut of TV Squad