There's a tendency in our culture, and it's certainly prevalent in the
blogosphere, to snark at anything that doesn't immediately turn us on. I'm guilty of this myself, but I cut myself some
slack because I'm writing about the entertainment industry, which is, to me anyway, of little consequence within the
Grand Scheme.InDefenseOf-related stories
In Defense Of: Maria Bamford
There's a tendency in our culture, and it's certainly prevalent in the
blogosphere, to snark at anything that doesn't immediately turn us on. I'm guilty of this myself, but I cut myself some
slack because I'm writing about the entertainment industry, which is, to me anyway, of little consequence within the
Grand Scheme.Continue reading In Defense Of: Maria Bamford
In Defense Of: Deal or No Deal
A couple of days ago, my fellow game show fan Bob gave a big thumbs down to Deal or No Deal,
the new game show on NBC. He thought the premise, where a contestant goes through torturous rounds of elimination
to determine if the briefcase he picked has a ton of money in it, got too tedious after 20 minutes or so. He also
thought the "banker", who calls in between each rounf to offer to buy the case off the contestant for mostly
increasing amounts of money, was a goofy device.Well, I didn't get a chance to watch the show until tonight, and I've got to say, I liked it. In this episode a woman managed to get the bank offer up to $201,000 before taking the deal, which turned out to be the right decision. Same with the second contestant, who, even though many of the big money cases were eliminated early, got the bank offer up to $99,000 before leaving his 50-50 shot behind (again, he made a good deal).














