Greg Gutfeld-related stories
Posted Sep 23rd 2009 5:00PM by Bob Sassone
Filed under: Other Comedy Shows, News, OpEd, Reality-Free

There used to be a lot of TV shows on overnight that were worth watching. I don't mean repeats of sitcoms or dramas that usually air earlier, but original programming geared towards the night owl. There aren't many shows like that anymore, but there's one on Fox News (yes, Fox News) at 3 AM and it's well worth catching (if you're worried about staying up that late, well, that's why God put DVRs on this Earth).
If I had to describe
Red Eye it would be like this: it's a mix of
Politically Incorrect and
The McLaughlin Group, only for people who are up late at night drinking or eating too much junk food, with a host who comes at things from a conservative viewpoint but it's not really a political show. They go more for the jokes than they stress any ideology, and it's actually really funny. Like
The Daily Show or
The Colbert Report, it can't be easy to write a show that's on every single night, but host Greg Gutfeld pulls it off.
Continue reading Shows You Should Be Watching: Red Eye
Posted Feb 18th 2007 6:02PM by Julia Ward
Filed under: FOX, News, Talk Show

The
Chicago Tribune has
filed a trademark infringement lawsuit to stop the Fox News Channel from using the name
Red Eye for its late-night round table show. For those of you outside of Chicago,
RedEye is a weekday offering from the
Tribune aimed at readers in their 20s and 30s. The
Tribune has also requested unspecified damages. You may be wondering to yourself, did the
Tribune sue the film
Red Eye, too? No, they didn't, but the
Tribune isn't just delivering the karmic comeuppance to Fox for their own "fair and balanced" lawsuit. There's a reason why the
Tribune has gone all litigious.
Because
Red Eye, which features blogger Greg Gutfeld as its host, covers current events, politics and pop culture in a colloquial manner - much as the
Tribune's tabloid offering does - the assumption might be made that the two are collaborating. I'm not sure who would make that assumption, but apparently, someone would. So, there you go, another day in the life of intellectual property law.