TVSquad

I agree with you 100%.

are you fkin kidding? There are kids that tune into those shows. You dont stimulate oral sex in front of children you stupid sloth.

Absolutely not! I am pro-choice and pro-gay marriage. When I moved and joined a church, I made sure it was inclusive. No tolerance? Not for me. And yet, I thought this was in extremely poor taste.

When you only respond to the gay guy and not to Lady Gaga or Carrie Underwood for also being extremely sexualized, yeah, it kind of does.

1. Aren't all morning shows Wonder Bread?
2. I agree with Dan that the performance suffered more from lack of talent.
3. The irony is that the AMA's were pretty much created for ABC after the Grammy Awards went to CBS. Now ABC treats Lambert like he smells bad. ABC acts
like they were the innocent that was duped. ABC was certainly happy to promote Lambert's promote Lambert's appearance before the event. Now CBS gets to rub ABC's nose in it. This could end up being more entertaining than the performance.
4. It isn't like Lambert ever portrayed himself as low-risk. Isn't a bit like hiring Prince and then pretending to be shocked afterwards.

The above comments all seem just as judgmental and hypocritical towards people who don't want themselves or children exposed to this sort of indecent debauchery.

It goes both ways folks. Remember Janet Jackson's boob? It's not because he's a man. It's because when they committed themselves to watch a music award show, they weren't expecting a performance border-lining on soft-core porn.

You want to go ahead and put it on Comedy Central or (gasp) MTV at 11pm when most of America is asleep, go ahead.

The performance was over the top and, in my opinion, the large stage show compensated for his lack of talent. There are many other homosexual performers who have become the biggest stars in the world without having to expose hundreds of thousands of Americans to a performance like that.

While this might have given him an advantage in the short run, let's see him stand the test of time the way Elton John has been able to in the classiest of ways: writing and performing great music.

In 30 years, Adam Lambert's name will be known no better than Taylor Hicks' is now.

The Janet Jackson incident involved actual nudity. And while, yes, I agree that the blatant sexuality is irritating, we shouldn't just pick and choose what's "going too far" according to each and every individual--because each and every individual will have a difference in opinion over what's "going too far." We should just decide "No Sexuality" altogether, so there's no confusion. Underwood and Gaga were both dressed up like prostitutes, but it's only wrong if someone's face is near someone's crotch for 5 seconds? Yeah, this argument makes very little sense to me.

I'm not sure of the number, but each written letter represents a certain number of people. I don't remember if it's 1,000 or 10,000 or what. But trust me, it's not just 1,500 people who are unhappy.