Miss California USA files a lawsuit
Posted Sep 1st 2009 3:00PM by Bob Sassone
Filed under: Celebrities, Reality-Free

Carrie Prejean, aka Miss California USA (yes, apparently there is a difference between Miss California and Miss California USA, which is more information I ever thought I'd know about these pageants) has
filed a lawsuit against two pageant officials.
You may remember that
Prejean caused an uproar back in April when moron Perez Hilton asked her a question about gay marriage at the MIss USA Pageant. Prejean was fired a couple of months later for violating her contract and not appearing at several pageant events. Prejean says that pageant officials Keith Lewis and Shanna Moakler really got rid of her because of what she said during the show and because she talked a lot about God.
Donald Trump hasn't made a statement about this yet, but I'm sure he will.
Tags: beauty pageant, carrie prejean, donald trump, keith lewis, lawsuit, miss california usa, miss usa
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-01-2009 @ 3:28PM
royce said...
I think all those emails gawker got a hold of, and the fact that Trump didn't fire her initially prove the real reason she got fired by the Miss Universe group.
She thought her new found infamy gave her a licence to do whatever she wanted, and ignored her commitments to her Miss Universe contract.
Reply
9-01-2009 @ 3:36PM
CRVBOY said...
She should never have been crowned in the first place and was rightfully fired. She should have been let go as soon as she started in on her homophobic and bigoted comments. Whatever her religious beliefs are, are her business and have absolutely nothing to do with being Miss USA, Miss California, Miss California USA or even Miss nomer. She can believe whatever religious dogma she wants, but when she attempts to push those views on to other people, that's a problem.
Someone call Andy Warhol, her 15 minutes are more than up.
Reply
9-01-2009 @ 4:49PM
Rico said...
"Whatever her religious beliefs are, are her business and have absolutely nothing to do with being Miss USA, Miss California, Miss California USA or even Miss nomer."
If they have nothing to do with being Miss USA, etc., then why did Mario Lavandeira ask her about them during the pageant?
9-02-2009 @ 12:49AM
Ryan said...
When did she attempt to push them on others? Didn't she specifically state, when answering a direct question, that they were here views and that she didn't intend to push them on others?
9-01-2009 @ 5:10PM
RobynM said...
She's sounding rather like the flip side of Richard Hatch these days, with the whole "It can't be anything I've actually done, it must be that I'm being persecuted for another reason" complex going on.
Reply
9-01-2009 @ 8:02PM
MacGuffin said...
This girl is so hot. But so delusional.
Seems like she has a persecution complex.
I respect her opinions -- even though I disagree with them. But to be such an advocate (or allow herself to be used as an advocate) is not a good thing for a Miss California. Needs to be a lot less controversial and a lot more Miss California. You know hot, dumb and smiling.
Reply
9-01-2009 @ 9:33PM
Jimmy said...
Anyone who actually saw the pageant knows that her answer was civil and anything but homophobic. She said (paraphrasing here) that she's glad we live in a country where people can choose who they marry, but she personally believes marriage should be between a man and a woman.
Trump smartly pointed out that her answer was the same as Barack Obama's during the 2008 campaign. I don't hear anyone calling him a bigot or a homophobe.
Perez Hilton is the bigot, and the media turned this into something it isn't.
Reply
9-02-2009 @ 10:47AM
Dave said...
"she's glad we live in a country where people can choose who they marry"
News flash: Unless you live in Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, or Iowa, that's simply false. Meanwhile, you can have all the "opposite" marriage you want. With it's almost 50% divorce rate (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/divorce.htm), it's *totally* sacred and perfect and the gays will completely ruin it.
9-02-2009 @ 4:26PM
Jimmy said...
News flash: Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa are in the U.S., and plenty of people have chosen to move to those states to marry.
Besides, you kind of contradict your own argument anyway. If 92 percent of the states don't support gay marriage, why was Miss California vilified for what she said?
9-01-2009 @ 10:42PM
Pingles said...
Don't mean to start a Flame War but I don't think anyone in this situation is a bigot or Homophobe.
Perez Hilton had every right to ask the question and her answer (whether I agree with it or not) was fine.
I don't know the details of why she was fired but I don't think we need to call either of them names.
Reply
9-02-2009 @ 5:44PM
Tony DIMeo said...
this reminds me of something the late great george carlin once said "Thout Shall keep thy religion to thyself"
Reply