The Emmy nomination process is clearly more flawed than a line of Dora the Explorer lawn darts. The system is outdated and always in need of a revamping, as technology and the proliferation of programming increases every year. Some contenders are just going to get a big, ugly, high school prom date snub.
That doesn't mean the process is without its no-brainers. I'm referring, of course, to the shows that deserve special recognition for changing the course of the medium and showing the world its possibilities and not to the people actually doing the nominating. The last season of The Wire will go down as one of the biggest no-brainers of all time.
Calling the last season of David Simon's show groundbreaking would be like calling War and Peace a little long-winded. It was everything you hope a show could be, short of a round-the-clock marathon of Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders reenacting The State's "$240 Worth of Pudding" sketch.
So why did it not earn a single nomination from this year's Emmy list? The problem lies in the process. The last season was technically eligible for a nod, but the committee that oversees such nominations had already compiled their list of the year's ten best dramas and The Wire didn't make the cut. That and smart shows that challenge conventional thinking about society make the committee's brains feel all "hurty."
The process has gone through some minor changes from year to year, but not enough to effect any real change. The whole ordeal is really subjective. The best shows aren't always going to make the cut because the people who provide input on the process are submitting their own opinions. It doesn't mean the Emmys are completely flawed as a way of recognizing hard work and talent and need to be yanked from our consciousness. It's just a popularity contest. Shows like The Wire don't need awards to know that their good. All you have to do is watch them.
However, the day that Family Guy gets a nod for Best Drama....
Mike Henry and Daryl Hall on a Cleveland Show Thanksgiving
The TV Squad Podcast: The Prisoner, '80s TV, soap news and more
Let's talk about spoilers ...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-20-2009 @ 10:23AM
Willmore2000 said...
Yes. Along with BSG.
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 10:48AM
chuck said...
actually, the last season of the wire was the weakest. still, emmy sucks.
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 11:42AM
protista said...
Yes
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 11:39AM
Ryan said...
Actually BSG is coming up roses when compared to other Emmy-snubbed shows:
Battlestar Galactica - 19 Emmy nominations including 2 wins (special effects) and 2 nominations each for Writing or Directing. (4 seasons)
Buffy the Vampire Slayer - 14 Emmy nominations including 2 wins (minor categories) and 1 nomination for Writing. (7 seasons)
Friday Night Lights - 4 Emmy nominations including a win for Casting and 1 nomination for Directing. (3 seasons)
The Wire - 2 Emmy nominations for Writing. (5 seasons)
So from the looks of this, yeah The Wire really IS the biggest Emmy loser here. Ouch.
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 12:20PM
Jeff said...
Actually The Wire that year DID make the final 10 nominees. The problem was partly HBO's fault. The episode they showed to the panelists was the series finale "30". Which is a great episode, but is great because of everything that went before it. Someone who had never seen the show wouldn't understand the relevance of most of what happened that episode. Granted other episodes have that problem as well, but some work better for first time viewers than others. I would have shown the penultimate episode, which has some awesome scenes regardless of whether you had seen the show before or not.
Also, they showed an hour and half episode to a bunch of panelists after they had went through most of the other shows, and were tired.
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 12:57PM
Tony said...
If The Wire didn't get an emmy for Season 4 then it was never going to get one. Yes it's the biggest snub. Not to mention The Shield should have been nominated for it's brilliant final season.
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 1:28PM
Ryan said...
> Shows like The Wire don't need awards to know that their good.
Their good what?
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 1:39PM
daluc said...
What about HBO Oz?
If I am not wrong, Oz was snubbed at its time, wasn't it?
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 2:11PM
Ryan said...
Definitely a worse showing than The Wire.
Oz was nominated for only two Emmys in its 6-year run and they were for non-major categories (casting and guest star).
7-20-2009 @ 2:23PM
SJ said...
I'm just shocked that the whole show never got nominated even once...not even for the 4th season which was really the most "popular" (or hyped).
At least it got writing credits...the whole nomination process is ridiculous, where people just watch the episodes sent in and decide then what they want to nominate. you have to see one whole season to really appreciate this.
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 2:25PM
SJ said...
Oooh...I think The Wire was eligible last year, not this year. It aired back in early 2008.
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 2:38PM
Arclight said...
"Shows like The Wire don't need awards to know that *their* good."
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 4:05PM
David said...
"Homicide: Life on the Street" was never nominated for Drama Series, and Andre Braugher was only nominated once (and won, for the "Subway" episode). As far as I recall, it was never nominated for any directing or writing Emmys, none of the other cast was ever nominated, and the only other nods it got were for Guest Actor (Vincent D'Onofrio and Lily Tomlin).
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 4:45PM
MDH1980 said...
The series finale was nominated for best writing last year, how could they be eligable this year. The finale aired March 30, 2008. I thought the awards covered from June 2008 to May 2009.
Reply
7-20-2009 @ 8:42PM
ryan said...
I've long since gotten used to the miscarriage of justice with The Wire not receiving any of its due credit for acting or writing. This is usually explained by the flawed process of judging where one episode is supposed to be the basis for judging an entire series. Thus, a show such as The Wire where each episode is extremely dependent on the episodes which came previously -- they all do poorly with few exceptions. The Wire is then penalized further for being "difficult" or non-accessible, with lots of heavy slang and similar-looking characters.
So that's the standard explanation. What I really don't understand is how they they can recognize Generation Kill with so many honours. Like The Wire, Generation Kill is inaccessible, with heavy usage slang to the point where the DVD set includes a pamphlet explaining some of the jargon. The characters all look the same in their uniforms, even after repeated viewings it's still difficult to place some of the less prominent characters.
So why can the Emmy's recognize the brilliance of Generation Kill but not The Wire? Is it simply because the miniseries category has less competition? Or did they finally wake up to their colossal mistake?
Reply
7-21-2009 @ 5:04PM
MIke said...
Yes. Unequivocally yes. Possibly the greatest show ever broadcast on television. Cased closed. End of story.
Reply
8-03-2009 @ 3:47PM
Daluc said...
Just for the record: HBO Oz is the best show of all time.
If awards didn't come, it really doesn't matter.
A great work does not need crowns.
Reply