(S01E17) It's the last episode ever of the American version of this show. I'm not sure if it's appropriate or not, but it happened on April Fool's Day, as well. They certainly took the show to its most literal conclusion possible. As I write this, I'm still processing a lot of the story.Comparisons are inevitable, and the ending of the British series was hands-down better. However, this one was good for a couple of laughs and wasn't completely outrageous (close, but not completely).
To summarize for those who want the heavy spoilers now: it turns out that Sam is an astronaut (let's not forget that his nickname throughout the show has been "Spaceman") on Earth's first mission to Mars in 2035. While in a deep sleep for the two-year journey, his brain is manipulated by miniature brain-robots into believing that he's from 2008. However, there was a glitch and suddenly he's in 1973. In short, it was all a dream.
They went full sci-fi with that ending. I recognize the budget was limited, but shouldn't they have been weightless on that ship (okay, that's nitipicking). An even bigger piece of fiction would be the concept that Ray Carling would ever be hired by any space agency anywhere ever.
The show used good themes, such as family, controlling your own destiny, and being a stranger in a strange land. I cheered when Annie made detective. I cheered when Sam got over his daddy issues. Having Harvey Keitel ("Major Tom") end up being Sam's father in 2035 struck me as a little weird (isn't he a little old for space travel?), although the 1973 Gene Hunt and Sam Tyler were pretty much at a father/son relationship at the end.
The fact that he was dreaming does explain a lot, such as why it seemed more like a cop show than reality. Or why Sam Tyler kept getting his ass kicked by his "father" despite supposed years of police training. Or why Sam could pick a lock on a set of handcuffs with a toy.
We'll never know how the creators would have dragged things out if the show had made future seasons. I would have liked a little more exploration of Ray Carling's relationship with his wife, but alas, it will never be.
I liked the cameos by several characters from past episodes (including the imaginary Windy. It's such a Quantum Leap relationship between her and Sam that she might as well be named Al). The sudden backtrack through all the previous episodes was cute, as well.
One minor quibble: they should have played Bowie's Life on Mars at the end, particularly considering that they were literally on Mars.
For the last time, favorite Michael Imperioli line of the episode: "How many times does one guy have to crap on your head before you stop wearing it as a hat?"
Overall, the series wrapped up nicely with an ending that was satisfying. And while Life on Mars has ended, I still eagerly await the soundtrack. Are there any nagging questions that you have left from the series? Tell us in the comments.
May you always find home in the place that you are.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
4-02-2009 @ 6:14AM
mikey mike said...
This will become a cult classic series. Like the early Sopranos, a little rough in a hurry to establish characters but nonetheless well-executed overall. The soundtrack is perfect. Had it lasted, there would have been more celebrity appearances, maybe in 1970s character. This also proves Imperioli deserves a lead role after back-to-back great supports/second leads. Keitel showed the wonderful actor he is by not dominating but also leading through delivery. Annie was fine. She seems to be one of those "oh yeah it's her" actors. That is, fine for what is demanded of the role.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 6:06AM
Paul said...
Since it appeared that things in the "dream" manifested from real situations inside his head, what kind of messed-up issues was Astronaut Sam having where he ends up banging his dad's daughter? I mean, I know it wasn't his "dad", but if the parallel is supposed to always be there, it's messed up.
At least it was an "ending", but there are many more ways I would've PREFERRED the series to end that didn't involve 2035 and a Mission to Mars (ordered by future President Obama).
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 2:47PM
Brent Schmidt said...
THIS. That's kinda sick how the writers had him have sex with his sister. Even if it isn't actually real... c'mon.
4-02-2009 @ 5:32PM
Lou said...
They shouldn't have made Hunt his dad. That was lame.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 7:24AM
bruce said...
Here's the thing - because it was a shortened one-season series, I actually liked the ending. But if the show had dragged on for years, I think I'd be pissed off. Let's put it this way - if they pull this sort of trick ending with the series finale of Lost, I will be EXTREMELY friggin pissed off (like if the whole thing was just Jack's dream on Oceanic 815, which he wakes up from as the plane safely lands). The fact that there were only 17 episodes of this show is what allows me not only to like the way they ended it, but accept it as plausible, originally intended (i.e. not made up at the last second to surprise for the sake of being surprising), and well-rounded.
I think killing off the show when they did is what will ultimately make these 17 episodes a classic with great DVD sales. Had it gone on for 3-5 full 22-episode seasons, I think I'd be very pissed off at a "gotcha" ending like this. But with the short run, it works well. And there were enough clues throughout the entirety of the series to make this a very plausible, logical, consistent ending.
I would have liked to have seen what the actual astronaut characters were like as compared to their "Sam's 1973 police trip" counterparts. As pointed out, what space agency in their right mind would let Ray Carling (as we've come to know him) within 100 yards of a spaceship, let alone put him on an extended mission to Mars. But maybe the real Ray Carling is nothing like the "1973 cop" Carling. It would have been nice to delve into that just a little bit, but I realize they were short on time.
Between his performances as Vic Tyler on this show, Dennis Duffy on 30 Rock, and Charlie Dixon on Terminator: TSCC, I've come to really like Dean Winters as an actor. Unfortunately I always think of Dennis Duffy first. But he's had a lot of good parts in a lot of good TV shows over the past year or two, and he's one of those actors I keep an eye out for, b/c he's bring something unique to the part. Sucks that TSCC killed off his character in the last episode.
One last thought: Gretchen Mol has always looked much better as a blond, and she should always have blond hair.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 10:33AM
cdawg said...
don't forget Dean in Rescue Me and L&O SUV!
4-02-2009 @ 8:03PM
Jogue said...
And where he first caught my eye as Ryan O'Reily on OZ!
4-03-2009 @ 11:55AM
Tony Padon said...
The show was a great mix of charaters and I thought the sound track was excellent. I really don't watch much TV but, being 20 yrs old in 73, I couldn't help but tune in and I thoroughly enjoyed the whole series. I definitely would liked to have seen another season. I also liked Imperioli's existential rant in the finale. He fit the part to a T. What I think I like most about the whole series was it's odd mix of period specific references / juxtapositions, mother / father / family complexity, Gretchen Mol / Sam thing and the tight-knit attitude of the squad /core cast. The whole thing just worked well and I'm disappointed it end too soon. Like Imperioli said, about the best you can hope for is to find a little piece of something or someone you like and get some satisfaction in your short stay on this rock. It was a some of that...
4-02-2009 @ 7:34AM
Jason said...
I think it's a travesty that this show was cancelled so quickly. It obviously has a huge following, great reviews, an amazing cast, great writing, etc.... shouldn't those be qualities in a show worth keeping on the air? Oh well, I suppose it's time for another Super Nanny Wife-Swapping De-tox Variety Dancing show to grace the air. (I like to think of reality shows as huge awkward metal plates to patch potholes on side streets: quick, easy to make, and no filler.)
I'll miss you most of all, scarecrow. :)
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 7:47AM
Toby O'B said...
'Life On Mars' always was a limited run premise and to have dragged it out even further would have weakened its impact at the end, no matter what type of scenario they came up with to explain everything. And if they did get a second year and continued to bleed viewers, ABC might not have been so indulgent and let them come up with an ending; they would have been cancelled outright. At least this way, we have a complete story.
'The Prisoner' only needed 17 episodes, and it's still my favorite TV series. The original 'Life On Mars' is in my Top Ten and that had only 16. Maybe the US TV industry should start thinking more in terms of limited run series.
I'll bet most of the American audience for this show never even saw the original. I hope they do check it out, but I also think those viewers never would have accepted that series' ending for this one. I just don't think it's in the general American psyche to be comfortable with that. This ending could be said to be the most American option possible - we've always seen ourselves as pioneers. (Cue the 'Star Trek' voice-over...)
It wasn't a great series, but it never failed to be enjoyable, and I'm quite happy with how it turned out.
And I liked the two 'Wizard of Oz' touches at the end, one implied. First, Gene Hunt's quote "I think I'll miss you most of all, Scarecrow" and then Sam's variation on the "and you were there and you, and you... and you" routine.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 7:59AM
bruce said...
Tony: Even though we Americans have extremely short attention spans, which makes short seasons somewhat logical, the networks are too chickenshit to take a show that's getting good ratings off the air. Why invest in a product that only gives returns for a limited time when you can invest in a product that can potentially give returns perpetually (like the simpsons) or at least a couple of years on average? It's bad business, especially when it costs so much to develop and produce a TV show for the American market.
If Lost is still getting good ratings, my thoughts on it only having 2 more seasons per demand of Lindelof and Cuse - I'll believe it when I see it. Another few seasons will be created when the money is thrown at their feet. Or new showrunners will be found.
I'm actually sympathetic with the networks on this from a business standpoint - and as a viewer I'd hate to have a TV show I like taken off the air solely out of principle. Any story that can be told in 10 episodes can be told in 100 with a lot more detail. As long as you like the premise and the characters, and it's not boring, why not opt for the "extended edition"? Everyone does when it comes to DVDs. It's comparing a short story to a novel, but they're written for different purposes.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 8:29AM
Toby O'B said...
Who's Tony? LOL
As for 'Lost', I'm hoping Jughead will explode at the end of the series and wipe out everybody. Not that I hate them - far from it. I just want it impossible for somebody else to come along later and ruin my memories of the show by trying to keep it going without Cuse and Lindelof.
4-02-2009 @ 8:21AM
KenMo said...
It doesn't suprise me that ABC would bail on a show like this. They are the same as FOX and HBO and Showtime and any of the others who only run things based on their bottom line.
This show was great and I am just happy that they were able to give it any ending.
It's a better treatment than 90% of the other shows that the networks bail on and let the fans swing in the breeze.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 8:47AM
RT said...
Never saw the ending coming. Thought it wrapped things up nicely.
Great show, best cast on TV. For it to be replaced by more reality is a travesty.
Thanks to the people who put it together and gave us one great year.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 8:53AM
bruce said...
RT: surely 3 straight hours (instead of just 2) of "which pair can lose the most weight" is better for America than Harvey Keitel et al in a unique, interesting, well-written show.
We get the TV shows that we deserve just like we get the government that we deserve.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 8:56AM
laura said...
I hated the ending, I just sat there in shock and then said "oh cmon seriously?" It just seemed so .....wrong.
The voice of the computer is windy, he was 2B, Hyde 125, all the people he worked with as fellow astronauts, I mean the horrible wig they put on Gretchens head should be yanked off and trampled as a scene killer. AND the references to the Obamas again. I know thats to ground us in 2009, but I rolled my eyes.
If this is what they planned all along for this series, and it would have ended like this after a few seasons? I am glad they cancelled it.
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 9:31AM
bruce said...
I just watched it again...
Why (how) would Barack Obama be president in the year 2035? Unless they were implying that Michelle Obama is President in 2035 (it's not clear from the use of pronouns the guy says in the videocom - "she went to be with her father" or something like that).
Either that, or Obama's such a great president that after 8 years we amend the constitution to let him serve additional terms.
Windy the computer clearly states that it's 2035, though, and the final "life on mars" countdown goes from that year. Why mention Obama?
Reply
4-02-2009 @ 10:35AM
cdawg said...
you're kidding right? President Obama and her sister have gone to visit their father in Illinois who is sick. It's Sasha or Malia.
4-02-2009 @ 12:00PM
darcy said...
If the writers are so excited about the prospect of using one of the Obama daughters as president then they should have done a bit more fact checking. Malia, is only 10 years old. In July 2035 she will turn 37. The minumum age for president is 35, which she will not yet be in Jan., 2033 at the inauguration.
If it was such an important reference, why didn't they just change the year?
4-02-2009 @ 9:40AM
Bas said...
I liked that they used lines from Bowie's "Life on Mars" as dialog during the finale, rather than just playing the song.
As to the female Obama reference, I thought they might be referring to his oldest daughter as president.
Reply