TVSquad

Come on! GM is in the Car-making business, not the film-making business. They're losing billions of dollars. It's no great surprise that they're cutting back on handouts like this. It's just smart business.

Reply

Why are you bashing GM like this? They bankrolled his documentaries for years, and then when they get into money problems they pull the plug to save money, like everyone is asking them to. This post sounded like a bitter child. Why did you hope that GM collapses? Thousands, if not millions of people would be adversely affected. Quit piling on GM, they're doing the best they can with a situation in which no one is buying any cars.

Reply

You are a blogger who is supposed to be writing about Paris Hilton and Wife Swap? How exactly are you qualified to talk about GM? Have you seen reliability ratings for American cars? They score much better than a lot of your favorite Japanese cars. It's because of gullible idiots like you that every American manufacturing business is going under.

When the company is fighting for it's very existence, it is supposed to be shilling out millions for some art crap? Who is the clueless fellow that actually let you publish this crap.

I for one hope somebody is chronicling your firing from this site in ten days.

Reply

I found this post insulting. I'm a regular reader of TV Squad and an employee of GM. What you wrote was downright cruel and ignorant. The fact that you would worry about Ken Burns, a millionaire film maker during a time when thousands of people are losing their jobs everyday is mind boggling. GM is doing their best to stay alive and viable and save thousands if not millions of jobs around the world. You are a TV critic, not an auto industry analyst. Keep your ignorant thoughts to yourself on important issues, just for future reference.

Reply

If Burns's documentaries are as wildly popular for PBS as you say, then PBS should bankroll him and attract viewers that way. In case you haven't heard, cash taken from GM is now cash taken from the taxpayers, so GM has a responsibility to spend it on saving their company, not on saving Burns.

Reply

Danny I allways wanted to call you a douche but that might just be pilling on at this point. Way to go pal you proved my point.

Reply

That's cold.. I completely agree with the rest of the comments, you're out of touch here Danny..

Reply

Seriously....

I cannot believe that you are giving GM a hard time about this?????

I think it is honorable that they are making tough decisions to become viable again and here you go bashing them for it. I second everyone's comments above.

Sometimes it just seems like GM can't win. I'm not saying they're perfect, but they're working a heck of a lot harder to make things work than much of the banking industry.

Why don't you write a post complaining about AIG...oh yeah, it's ok to give CEO's million dollar bonuses while taking government money but when GM's CEO works for $1 and pulls out of a FILM (not auto related whatsoever) business, that's a big freaking deal...sigh....

I don't get it.

Reply

Wow. I can not imagine a more pathetic and childish approach to this news.

Delete this post and find a more suitable topic for this writer. Perhaps reviewing The Wiggles would suit his intellectual maturity.

Reply

Wait - so manufacturing selling people cars they actually ask for is dumb (the C/K1500 is the number 2 selling vehicle on the planet - next to the F-150), but it would be much smarter to continue bankrolling something that has almost zero ROI

I love Ken Burns work, but given their cash shortage, you'd think non-vehicle producing expendatures would have been cut a long time ago...

Reply

I think Ken Burns and his films are national treasures. However, I don't think that taxpayer money going to GM should be funneled into his films. As a country we should be supporting work like Burns's directly, no matter what our national economic status. But it should come from the National Endowment for the Arts, or some other organization. Not from a car company whose obvious failure in the marketplace has left it struggling for survival, and begging the federal government for handouts.

There. I'm sure I've made both sides unhappy. :-)

Reply

You know what? I'm a loyal Toyota owner and even I agree with everyone else's comments here. I think you missed the mark big time with this post.

You really need to do some fact checking in regards to the trickle down effect of GM, Chrysler, et al going out of business. It's not pretty and could, inadvertantly, cause you to loose your job and not just because of this stupid post.

Reply

Most of the previous posters have said it so I'll be brief. Your post was very ignorant. Stick to reviewing reality TV, as that seems to be about what you can handle.

Reply

Wow. I loved everything Ken Burns has done, but you complaints with GM seem pretty hacky. These guys are broke, so they cut expenses by not funding movies ( which in the end that's all Ken Burns is making) and now they're assholes?

Can't wait for more nuggets of wisdom.

Reply

All this love for a car company that has done bad business and made cars nobody wants to buy for YEARS, and yet is demanding federal money for their bad business practices? GM was going in the tank LONG before the economy began crumbling. It's unfortunate, yes, but it's true.

Danny also never said anything about AIG getting billions being a good thing, either, so I think it's rather silly to assume he thinks that way.

However, if GM goes under (which is looking more and more likely), Ken Burns would've been without the funding anyway, so I don't see how it's much different being cut out now vs. in the near future. And at least they've funded several Burns films over the years, which may not have happened had they not stepped up in the first place.

But believe it or not, the arts also create jobs. The money going from GM to Ken Burns didn't just help him make his fortunes (which are surely far less than GM execs) -- it also no doubt kept many other people employed, as well. The idea that art needs to be sacrificed due to the economy is preposterous, as 1) the arts do create jobs, and 2) the only real positive that can come out of financial uncertainty and "tough times" is strong and passionate creative pieces.

Reply

Sounds like Rush Limbaugh wrote this post instead of Danny. Seriously, let's not wish for failure unless we're talking about Michelle Malkin or (m)Ann Coulter.

Reply

rofl, the "end" of Ken Burns and PBS...over GM pulling out of advertising? I bet you think when you feel a swollen gland you think it's cancer, planning your funeral immediately.

Reply

I'm pretty sure someone with Burns reputation will be able to find another sponsor, even in these tough economic times.

Reply

Burns is a two-hit wonder with overt liberal leanings. Let him get a real job and make money like the rest of us. GM has every right to drop sponsorships, and considering their current financial situation, they should have done this long ago. And not just with Burns.

Reply