It was the best of Oscar it was the worst of Oscar. It wasn't the best show I've ever seen, but was it the worst Oscars ever as one friend emailed me? I think there were features that worked and features that tanked. There could have been more star power -- where were Tom Hanks, George Clooney, Jim Carrey, Sandra Bullock, Christian Bale, Tyler Perry (he had the biggest box office opening last week!), etc.? Forget about stars from the '70s...Anyway, I had predicted that the Oscars would stink. Well, I was wrong, or half-wrong. Separate from whether you agreed with the winners -- I did by and large -- or you didn't, what about the broadcast? I think if you had seen all the nominees (or at least the Best Picture noms), you probably had a rooting interest and were amused by most of the show. However, the other half was pretty bad. After the jump, what worked versus what did not.
Worked: Hugh Jackman as host
Energetic, attractive, witty and fun. I would use all those words to sum up Hugh Jackman's debut as an Oscar host. I'd also give him an "A" for effort as he was willing to try anything. The opening musical number, a do-it-yourself, scaled-down-for-the-recession extravaganza couldn't match the hilarity of Billy Crystal's classic song medleys, but Jackman was game. The best moment came when he carried Anne Hathaway onto the stage and had her join him in the Frost/Nixon tribute. Fortunately, it was planned and Anne sang and danced beautifully. The musical number got the night off to a good start. I'd invite Hugh back again and get him Billy Crystal's writers.
Didn't Work: Best songs nominees & the musical is back
Oy vey, do they really think that more people on stage is the answer to how to stage a musical number? It was sad that there were only three best song nominees this year, two from Slumdog Millionaire, which are Indian. The music sounded foreign and unfamiliar because it was! Mixing in the WALL-E song, with John Legend filling in for Peter Gabriel, was jarring. They didn't compliment each other. Later, Hugh Jackman tried to do a Fred Astaire nod crying, "The musical is back." The subsequent big production number -- choreographed by Baz Luhrman of Moulin Rouge fame, so he's to blame -- was like a bad traffic jam. Beyoncé stood out, but when did Zac Efron and the other kids appear? They were suddenly there out of nowhere. Worst of all, the musicals they were celebrating were shown in clips on the screen behind the dancers and the TV director didn't focus on it so there was no correlation between the two. It was a disaster.
Worked: Five Oscar winners presenting major acting Oscars
This was innovative and classy. Sophia Loren, Shirley MacLaine, Halle Berry, Marion Cotillard and Nicole Kidman paid tribute to this year's five nominees with a personal comment for each. The men did the same and in every instance, I was dazzled by the stars returning and the tributes they presented. Their tributes were as special as any film clip from the actor's performance.
Didn't work: Will Smith
Was he on cold medicine? Will Smith is a funny man. I know, I've seen him and he is usually relaxed and cool under any circumstances. Giving out sound editing, film editing, sound mixing and some other effect award, he was a bumbling mess. He looked unhappy and uncomfortable.
Worked: Nightclub set
The producers said they wanted the set to be less theater like and more like a nightclub with the proscenium jutting out and the stars -- and their faces -- prominently in view. For the most part, the set was a hit. Hugh Jackman came down the steps and talked to the stars, but wasn't too cutesy about it. The stars had a shorter walk to accept the Oscars, which was convenient.
Didn't work: Musicians on stage
The orchestra belongs in the pit. During the Best Original Score, the screen showing the films that were nominated for their music was buried in the back while I was shown close ups of violinists and trombone players. The music was lovely, but I needed to know what film was being nominated more than the bowing of a fiddle player. This mistake was repeated when Queen Latifah sang "I'll Be Seeing You" to accompany the memorial tribute. The images of the film industry greats who died this past year needed to be shown full screen for home viewers, not projected on a backstage screen so you had to strain to see them. Queen's singing was lovely and I don't blame her for the lame staging.
Worked: Comedy stars
Thank goodness for crazy Ben Stiller, doing a take-off on Joaquin Phoenix that was timely and goofy and hilarious. The Pineapple Express mini-sequel with James Franco and Seth Rogan (directed by Judd Apatow) was also on target. Even Tina Fey and Steve Martin doing the writing awards was amusing.
Didn't work: Jerry Lewis tribute
Eddie Murphy seemed to be in a great hurry to get through the tribute to Jerry Lewis. Considering that there was only one special Oscar for the night, couldn't there have been a better tribute created for Jerry? Eddie never even worked with Jerry. Robert DeNiro did in The King of Comedy; he could have said something. To Jerry's credit, his acceptance was short and sweet, but he deserved more of a salute for all the years and all the money he's raised for muscular dystrophy.
Worked: International flair
The fact that Slumdog Millionaire won eight Oscars, including Best Picture, put an emphasis on how film is a universal art form crossing all cultural and national lines. There were also winning films from Japan and Germany, as well as the United States. Even Penelope Cruz represented the worldwide pool of great stars, and she remembered Spain's Pedro Almandovar when she won her Oscar, her Volver director.
Didn't work: Hollywood history
Where were the clips honoring the great films of Hollywood's past? Chuck Workman does these wonderful montages every year that reminds us of former winners. Not this year. Last night's Oscars was devoid of nostalgia in the form of film clips, at least those that the home viewers could see.
Worked: Shorter commercial pods
Did you notice that the breaks didn't seem as long? I did. I didn't time it, but if you were running into the kitchen to make a sandwich during a commercial break, you didn't make it back in time for the next award. This made the show seem shorter, even though it was actually longer. Another plus: nobody's speeches were cut off.
Didn't work: Technical awards
I've said it before (and so did Joel), but it bears repeating: some specialty awards should be in the scientific award presentation not the TV broadcast. TV viewers are not interested in Documentary Short Subject, Sound Mixing, et. al. The broadcast could save 30 minutes by moving some awards out of the TV show.
Worked: Heath Ledger's family
Anticipating that Heath would win for The Dark Knight, the Oscar's invited his family to accept. Their speeches were touching and the presentation appropriate and dignified.
Didn't work: Sean Penn's politics
Sean Penn deserved to win for Milk. He chose to use the airtime to make a political statement. The Oscars are not the place for politics. It wasn't right in the past and it was off-putting last night. I agreed with what Penn said, but it wasn't the proper venue.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
2-23-2009 @ 12:17PM
fishymcdonk said...
Completely 1000% percent disagree with you about Sean Penn. Of course he should use the airtime to point out a national disgrace. People don't choose to be homosexual. They deserve equal rights, period. What a fugged up country.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 1:04PM
Joseph said...
I completely agree with you. A night of honoring people who imitate and manipulate life for a living are not supposed to talk about the very thing we pay them millions of dollars to reflect?
The Oscars are as American as apple pie. There is no one better than ultra sensitive and perceptive people to talk about an issue that is raping our citizens at an event that is an American celebration. Especially when the role he won for was about the same issue that was being fought 30 years ago with no solution.
It was politics that influenced the oscars to be less glam this year and the nomination and winners couldn't be more political on an annual basis. If politics were taken out of the oscars art would be the driving force behind winners/nominations (ie: Wall-E would have been nominated for best picture).
I don't know what could be more political outside of washington, than the oscars.
2-23-2009 @ 1:35PM
Andrew said...
He won the award, I think that earns him the right to say whatever he damn well pleases.
2-23-2009 @ 3:06PM
viewdrix said...
I felt that Black, the screenwriter for Milk, was heart-breakingly sincere and genuine in his call for equal rights and assuring any gay children that they are loved by God. It was beautiful.
Sean Penn took the stage, and it just seemed like he was egotistical about it, using the podium as a chance to belittle everyone over another political issue.
I think that was the difference. An unknown gay writer getting the chance to deliver a beautiful speech, versus an actor who's actually been immortalized on film as too big-headed and political (Team America) talking down to a country.
2-23-2009 @ 12:30PM
Gill said...
The problem with Sean Penn's speech wasn't the politicized nature; it was that as always Penn seems to make his own politics all about himself and not about the issue itself.
Dustin Lance Black said it all in a more compact and elegant way.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 12:39PM
Edward said...
Agreed!
2-23-2009 @ 12:39PM
Media Glutton said...
"The Oscars are not the place for politics." So sayeth TV Squad, our valiant Decider of where and where not to speak about politics.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 12:43PM
laura said...
I agree that John Legend singing Peter Gabriel was horrible!
I also agree to chopping out all the sound mixing, editing awards for another place, I almost drifted off during those. same goes for costumes, and makeup.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 12:55PM
Steve Ungrey said...
To put it succinctly... get up there, shut up on your politics, thank the academy, do more classy stuff like giving your props to Mickey Rourke, and get off.
By the way... FYI, because it was technically his character, Jerry Lewis was an executive producer on the first Nutty Professor film Eddie did. Yeah, it's kind of a loose tie, but it might help explain to some why Eddie presented the award.
Otherwise, nice review Allison. I agreed with pretty much everything you had to say.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 12:57PM
PB said...
I think I may be the only person who *didn't* like the Seth Rogan/James Franco skit. It seemed so forced and to me, not funny at all.
I did like Hugh Jackman a lot, as well as the new way to introduce the acting awards with 5 previous winners (I got the impression that Adrian Brody had no clue who Richard Jenks was, though). It was an enjoyable evening, but my biggest beef was not being able to see all the montages (like the In Memoriam one, which I look forward to each year). It was just too frenetic.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 1:02PM
Lisa said...
Full disclosure, I didn't watch the whole show. I agree with most of the observations. However, I am biased as someone involved behind the scenes in live theater but art direction, make-up, costumes, and film editing make the darn movie. Without them you have naked, bare-faced actors on an empty stage rambling for however much film was shot.
These folks get precious little public recognition so the 10 minutes it takes to go through them is well deserved.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 1:20PM
Jimmy said...
First of all, PLEASE get the show to three hours. I figured I would fall asleep before it was over, so I set my DVR to run 15 minutes late. It cut off half-way through Sean Penn’s speech – with one award still to go!
Other comments:
I thought it was a slap in the face to reduce the Best Song nominees to a medley and then trot out the silly musical number.
I had mixed feelings about the way the nominees were presented. In some cases (Shirley MacLaine and Robert DeNiro), it worked; in others, it didn’t. It took up a lot of time, but on the plus side, I think it made the night more special for those who didn’t win.
The Pineapple Express feature was funny; Ben Stiller, not so much.
Sean Penn was very good in Milk, but Mickey Rourke was better; he deserved the Oscar. If you want to talk about Oscar injustices, explain to me why Penn wasn’t nominated for direction (Into The Wild) last year.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 2:16PM
ac said...
I agree what they did to Rourke was highway robbery. Im still surprised the movie wasnt nominated for best picture. Sean Penn would be more derseving winning last year for Into the Wild, which like The Wrestler was mostly overlooked. It was MUCH better than No Country for Old Men.
I also feel that Slumdog didn't deserve to win best picture. It was a good film but I saw much better. I think if Dark Knight was nominated instead of The Curious Case of Forest Gump it would of won. Also Gran Torino was just plain snubbed along with Springsteen's song for The Wrestler.
2-23-2009 @ 7:27PM
Jimmy said...
P.S. Ryan Seacrest reached new levels of douchebaggery (or is it douchebaggedness?) in the "Red Carpet" show on E!
2-24-2009 @ 1:04AM
Phish said...
completely agree, mickey gave his heart and soul into that role, it moved me far more than sean's portrayal. mickey was ROBBED. The voters respect sean much more than mickey, but if they were all truly honest with themselves, they would all agree mickey's was the better performance.
2-23-2009 @ 1:40PM
Saffron said...
The only thing I really disagree with you on is the on-stage orchestra. I think it contributed to the vintage 1930s nightclub feel. What's really to blame during the Memorial was the awful camera work, not the violinist.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 5:36PM
RT said...
For the first time in forty years I didn't watch. I simply didn't want another liberal lecture.
When Hollywood figures out that people want to be entertained, not treated as idiots, I'll come back.
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 7:03PM
Joseph said...
I definitely don't speak for anyone other than myself, but I like stimulating ideas in the public forum that sparks conversation in the national dialog.
It is why I liked Slumdog, Wall-E, Milk, The Reader, and Frost/Nixon so much.
2-23-2009 @ 2:24PM
jj said...
***When Hollywood figures out that people want to be entertained, not treated as idiots, I'll come back.***
Well obviously there are a lot of idiots in the movie going public or the prop would not have passed. If Penn had derived a certain population who had no control over their "inadequecy" i.e. their religion, skin color, etc, then he would have been out of place. But he was speaking up against an injustice, and as Billy Crystal said while hawking City Slickers many years ago during Oscar "With 60 million people watching did you think I wouldn't?" (papraphrased)
Reply
2-23-2009 @ 2:52PM
smashthesymbols said...
I have to disagree about having past winners do a tribute to all the nominees in the acting categories. Does anyone really care that Whoopi Goldberg thought Amy Adams was good in Doubt? Just read the names and show a short clip like it's usually done.
Otherwise I mostly agree. Hugh Jackman, Heath Ledger's family and Ben Stiller were all good. The best song performance, the musical is back bit and the memorial tribute were all an absolute mess.
As for Sean Penn's politics, I'm with Gill. I actually agree with Penn completely, but he has a tendency to make himself look like an ass and draw attention away from the cause. Particularly after Dustin Lance Black addressed the same thing in a more elegant and touching manner.
Reply