I'm always fascinated by the ad campaigns that the networks come up with to sell or promote TV shows. I remember in 2004 when Fox debuted House, they created a magazine insert DVD of the pilot. It was a great way to get TV fans to try the show, and I -- for one -- bought Entertainment Weekly and watched the show. Giveaways are one way to drive awareness -- and sample the product -- but another is with a print ad campaign. Recently, Gossip Girl came up with a savvy set of posters and advertisements to call attention to the naughtiness of the show.
Now comes a new, original campaign for Showtime's Dexter in which the Michael C. Hall's character is imagined on the cover of magazines. Dexter on Esquire, The New Yorker, GQ, Wired; high-profile magazines that have a distinctive look, reconfigured for serial killer hiding in plain sight, Dexter Morgan. The ads look amazing and will be seen in all variety of magazines and plastered up as posters all over the place.
While very clever, and in keeping with the wit of the show, will the ad campaign drive viewership? That's the intent because Dexter is already a known commodity. In fact, after a run on CBS last winter during the Writer's Strike, more people got to see the show and get into it than ever did on Showtime. But now Dexter is back on premium cable. How many CBS Dexter fans will sign up for Showtime in time for the show's third season debut on September 28?
We're going to see an upswing in the numbers, especially since Jimmy Smits is now part of the Dexter cast. That can only help. As for the ad campaign, it's a reminder and probably a smart one. It's aimed at the fans who are already hooked more than those who've been out of the loop.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-07-2008 @ 1:02PM
Midnight13 said...
This isn't nearly as cool as what they did for season 2, with the "Fountains of Blood", where they would put red dye in a fountain so that it looked like it was shooting blood. This one is ok, but I like things a little more on the creatively viral side. That said, looking forward to season 3 of "Dexter".
Reply
9-07-2008 @ 2:23PM
domino said...
Did CBS air season 1 & 2 or just he first season?
I would rather have edited year-old seasons of Showtime and HBO series than the reality shows currently on.
Reply
9-07-2008 @ 2:49PM
SJ said...
Too bad the first episode of season 3 was a disappointment.
Reply
9-07-2008 @ 3:01PM
mojochris said...
I found the fact that he kills somebody a huge improvement over last year. Could be interesting.
9-08-2008 @ 11:14AM
Oneiroi said...
I feel like we're at a good place for season 3.
He's whining less about being so weird and unfeeling (which is why I got annoyed with season 1). He's gotten over most of his killing aversions. I kinda don't know where that brings us, but I hope it's good.
9-08-2008 @ 1:44PM
Dan said...
Really? I thought it was awesome, one of my favorite episodes of the show. A lot of stuff happens and it's clever as usual. There's no better show on TV these days.
9-07-2008 @ 3:05PM
Jen said...
Anyone know if the ads are already in the magazines? If not, when will they be released?
Reply
9-07-2008 @ 6:07PM
SirCrumpet said...
There is also a Rolling Stone cover: http://www.toxel.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/dexters1p4.jpg
Reply
9-08-2008 @ 1:52AM
Joe said...
I loved the first episode. It almost immediately fulfilled the promise of last year's finale, which is the evolution of Dexter.
Reply