This seems to be NBC Announcement Week. A day after we reported that the Peacock network was going to scrap their upfront presentation this year comes this news: they're getting rid of pilot episodes too!
Jeff Zucker says that pilots are too expensive and often aren't even a good indication of what the rest of the show's episodes will be like (we've seen this with many shows recently - the first episode is big and expensive and incredible and then the following episodes...not so much). Also, many shows never even get beyond a pilot episode, so he doesn't want to spend millions on pilots.
This makes sense on a lot of levels, especially financial, but I wonder exactly what NBC (and other networks, because I'm sure others will follow NBC's lead) will do to pick new shows that go on their schedule? Just rely on the scripts? Sample scenes that are shot? It seems to me that the networks will still want "first episodes" of a series but won't invest millions in one pilot episodes to attract advertisers and create buzz. I also think this is NBC's way of saying "we're going to have more reality and game shows."
[via TV Tattle]












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-23-2008 @ 2:24PM
Oreo said...
So they are getting rid of pilots Zucker is a cheapass who won't give 2% to the writers and wants 50 million more dollars for what? More game shows most likely!
Is there anyone in the world who thinks it's a good idea to have Zucker the fucker be in charge of a network? Hell he shouldn't have been in charge on The Today Show.
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 3:06PM
upoh05 said...
Keep in mind that many game show fans (such as myself) HATE these new game shows- they require very little or no skill (Deal or No Deal, How much is enough)- dramatic music (pretty much any of these shows), inflated prize budgets (Dont forget the lyrics), or self-depreciating moments of others (That Truth show, 5th grader). Even worse, the shows that buck the trend (1 vs 100- knowledge based, Singing Bee- light-hearted show) don't get watched. Sigh...
As for the no-pilot zone? What's the point? If a show doesnt get the ratings after 3 airings, the networks cancel it anyway!
1-23-2008 @ 11:58PM
Nathaniel said...
upoh, I happen to love Deal! It's a great game of chance and strategy... I don't see the problem! Though a lot of the people really are stupid and go no deal for far too long...
1-23-2008 @ 2:40PM
Scott said...
Why have pilots? Just let the people pick which briefcase has the money. Or give over-steroided freaks shiny outfits and big Q-tips to hit each other with.
Really, when will Zucker just bring back "Fear Factor" and complete the transformation of NBC into a cheap, ugly cable channel?
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 2:46PM
Eddie said...
Good thing we still have basic cable for new scripted shows.
Wait, what the hell did I just say?
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 5:04PM
Niraj said...
Actually it's likely that the networks that forego pilots will adopt the cable model of picking up series because it has proved to be far more successful while costing far less:
http://symbii.com/stories.php?sid=699&tid=18
1-23-2008 @ 2:59PM
GigG said...
Listen close. That sound you hear is NBC Entertainment circling the drain.
When are they going to fire that band of idiots?
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 3:34PM
Derek said...
They've got the whole concept of a pilot wrong. They shouldn't spend a huge amount of money on it and make it broadcast quality. It should be done on the cheap. Just the actors, not in full make up or costume, not with a full studio team (i.e. 50 credits coming up at the end of the episode).
Get the actors, give them some rehearsal time, and then film it with a couple of $1k handheld cameras from the rehearsal room. If you're an executive and want to know whether a show should be picked up for a first season, do you care about costume, makeup and sets? You shouldn't! It should be about the script, the chemistry between the actors, the word play, and how it feels. You can pick up all of that from a production costing $10k.
If you like what your $10k pilot gives you, then you give the go-ahead for a first half-dozen episodes. That's how Seinfeld started out. Start airing it on TV as they're filming episodes 4 and 5. By the time they're filming episode 6, you should know if it's being received well.
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 3:57PM
Frank said...
I think Derek's got it EXACTLY right.
They won't be "Pilots" anymore, they'll just be dress-rehearsal-like run throughs of the show.
The ones that get picked up with then reshoots these episodes with all the fancy lights and makeup and sets and stuff.
This actually makes ALOT of sense
1-23-2008 @ 4:02PM
Argus said...
Derek is spot on. Buffy and other shows ran on a format sort of in-between his idea and what goes on now. They still had a set and everything, but it was definitely low-budge. Of course, if its low budge that means that DGA won't have jurisdiction.
1-23-2008 @ 4:17PM
JLTorrente said...
That's the way that it should be: FOCUS on the basics (story, writing, chemistry acting) and then polish the other aspects IF it's worthy.
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 5:20PM
Jeff N. said...
I just wish the writers strike would end. There has to be a compromise that both sides could live with.
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 6:04PM
C C said...
If it were any other network planning to do this, I'd say it would be practical. My experience with tv has been that only a few of the best series' pilots hit it out of the park on the first swing. Most shows build off of solid but unspectacular debuts. And I've seen shows with really good pilots, but didn't follow up with episodes of equal quality. The networks would probably have equal luck ordering series based on scripts and show bibles rather than pilots.
However....THIS IS COMING FROM JEFF ZUCKER! Possibly THE idiot in charge of all the idiots in charge. He isn't interested in quality tv, he just wants to make a buck-preferably through his own production company. This is just a matter of not wanting any shows on NBC that aren't "in-house". Zucker doesn't make as much off of non-Universal shows, why should he even put them on his schedule?
Of course, the biggest joke with NBC/Universal Studios right now is that their biggest hit, House, isn't even ON NBC. It's on Fox.
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 7:16PM
Tim Hess said...
I remember the pilot for HERMAN'S HEAD being a videotaped presentation - shot on a theatrical stage. It really, really worked - sold the idea very well.
As for NBC.....Fire Zucker. Save the network.
http://its-over-tv.blogspot.com/
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 7:25PM
Dragulf said...
It doesn't matter what Jeff Zucker does. I barely watch his channel now, how is this news going to get me to watch more? NBC sucks. You only got real ratings from NFL games.
How classy were the public fights Zucker had with ABC's president?
Reply
1-23-2008 @ 7:36PM
Eludium-Q36 said...
Guess I'll be the first to declare it, but they're foregoing pilots because they'll pick what amateurs generate via Netvision, or Webisodes, etc. "Quarterlife" anyone ?! Start a series on the web, if it works, a network picks it up. This is the new "pilot" model. And it's brilliant. Let the productions themselves foot the upfront startup costs and all the networks have to do is to pick em up.
Reply
1-24-2008 @ 12:02AM
Nathaniel said...
Folks, don't forget NBC also has some of the best scripted shows on television. They may have a lot of reality, too, but I love me some Chuck, Heroes, 30 Rock, etc.
But yeah, I totally agree about the cheap pilot thing. That's where it's at. Anyone who doesn't agree is required to go pick up the DVD set of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia immediately.
Reply
1-24-2008 @ 1:24AM
Derek said...
We should start a campaign to give me Jeff Zucker's job :) I'm pretty sure I'd get the Pilot budget down from a crazy figure like $20 million to below $1 million, and would cut production costs per show by half (and then find a horses head in my bed from the unions no doubt).
I'd pull the late night talk shows earlier in the schedule so the first show is 10-11 and the second 11-12. I'd fire all but two of the writers on each talk show. We watch these shows half for the guests that are on, and half because we like the host and his own natural comedic talent. If he's just a mouthpiece for the jokes of a team of a dozen writers, then what's the point. I've been enjoying The Daily Show and The Colbert Report much more since they've lost the writers. It's also clear that Craig Ferguson would manage just fine without the writers behind him. It's obvious that there's a lot of him in his monologues and "bits". I don't know why American TV chooses a host based on their personality and comedy skill, and then drowns it out with the output of other writers. Don't get me wrong, I don't want the writers to be put out of work. I'd like them to group together and write their own shows.
I'm sure it wouldn't be popular, and might break the channel, but I'd also drop all reality shows in an attempt at preventing the future predicted by Mike Judge's film "Idiocracy". There isn't a single show that includes the word celebrity or reality in the title that's worth saving in my opinion. If the theme of the show is singing, dancing, skating, cooking, surviving, cleaning, making-over, love-matching or big-brother spying-on, then it's not going on my channel. Oh the power. I'm sure it'd go to my head and I'd end up like Jeff Zucker (an idiot that doesn't belong in television because I'd be out of touch with how to make the TV that people want to watch).
Reply
1-24-2008 @ 9:03AM
tcc3 said...
I'd watch your channel Derek. Would you also fight the marketing juggernaut Brawdo? Even though it has electrolytes?
1-24-2008 @ 9:33AM
Derek said...
But it's got what plants crave, how can you argue against that :)