(S04E07) I think I've struck upon the perfect analogy to describe my feelings about tonight's Office. In keeping with the pastry theme of the episode: tonight's show was like a perfectly baked black and white cookie. I'm not talking the cheap kind that you buy shrink-wrapped at a rest-stop, I'm talking the high-end black and white you'd get from a top-quality New York baker. The kind of black and white that Seinfeld might buy.The only problem is that I'm allergic to vanilla. So while I can see how some people might enjoy the whole cookie, for me to enjoy it, I have to concentrate only on the half I'm capable of digesting...
The ever-growing evidence of Ryan's douchebaggery continued tonight as the episode opened with the revelation that he organized a corporate retreat that included several branch-heads (as well as Michael's arch-nemesis Toby), but not Michael. The excuse given is that everyone "knows all they need to know about Michael", but of course, my own theory is that Ryan simply doesn't like Michael and understands enough about him to know that not including him is probably the most hurtful thing you can do to him.
This, along with the the non-invite to the "lunch" party has me convinced that Ryan is going out of his way to make Michael feel bad. What do you guys think? Is the constant disrespect of Michael simply a by-product of his character or is Ryan carrying out a conscious agenda?
Either way, the exclusion led to a typically childish reaction by Michael: he was going to have his own retreat! His first instinct is to invite Jim (which led to a pretty funny exchange regarding Michael's use of the word "hypothetically"), but Jim is "busy." Option two, obviously, is for Michael to travel into the woods a la the Discovery Channel's Suvivorman.
If you've never seen the show, it's similar to how Michael described it. Les Stroud -- a Canadian, proving once again that our brothers from the north are complete badasses -- is dropped into harsh environments equipped with only his wits keep and a camera to keep him company.
Survivorman is a show that my wife and I got into heavily during the late summer when pretty much all we did was take care of our newborn and watch TV. (I think being newly minted parents made us sympathize with a man being dropped into Antarctica by himself; if you think about it, the two are pretty much the same thing.) I consider myself a fan and I was intrigued by the idea that a mainstream show like The Office would consider parodying something as obscure as a show on The Discovery Channel. (Just out of curiosity, how many of you knew what Suvivorman was before tonight's episode? If you didn't, here's a video that shows Les surviving the scariest situation he's ever faced.)
Intrigued as I was, I was worried that the parody might lead to the kind of ridiculousness that I've criticized repeatedly in this space. I was worried about it for two reasons: one, I really like The Office and don't enjoy it when it ventures into stupidville; two, I really don't want to get another rash of hatemail telling me how I am a "douche" who "should be fired." Here's the equation: criticize ridiculousness = hatemail = Jay in therapy discussing why he keeps choosing professions that open him to criticism that he's obviously too thin-skinned to deal with properly.
So, what's the verdict? Was the Suvirvorman parody good or was it another step into the gradual transformation of Michael into Homer Simpson? Er...
Let's talk about the chocolate side of the cookie for a while, shall we?
With Michael out of the office, Jim is left in charge. Angela comes up and reminds him that it's Creed's birthday. As you'd imagine in an office run by Michael, birthdays are treated as rather big deals, with Michael insisting on a cake and candles, inappropriate gifts, off-key singing, and heart-attack inducing surprises. Jim uses his newfound authority to put his own rather dour and asocial stamp on the birthday tradition: rather than having 13 individual birthdays, he's going to have one big birthday party for everyone.
The office revolts, mostly over cake choices.
Jim, with Pam over his shoulder wearing the kind of wry smile that he usually has on, lets the cake situation get out of hand. In just a few quick missteps on the slippery slope, Jim is asking for "everyone's attention" just like Micheal. In fact, Phyllis accidentally calls Jim "Michael" at that point, forcing Jim to confront the monster he has become (not unlike how Jimmy from South Park had to hit rock bottom -- Video NSFW).
Jim's metamorphosis into Michael ranks, I think, with the greatest moments of the entire series. Not only was it hilarious -- Creed's Mamet-esque conversation with Jim regarding the peach cobbler had me doing the patented Office laugh and rewind -- but it was also dead-on in its observations. Like any of us would, the second Jim moves from the snarky Number Two spot to the Doctor Evil position, he begins to try and shape the office in his own image, with disastrous results.
Even though Jim considers himself much more in tune with the wants of the office than Michael, the movement from employee to boss turns him into an enemy. This is a reality that I saw all the time when I was teaching: the young teachers would come in and think "Hey, I'm super-cool, I'm in touch with the kids of today, I'm going to shake things up! The kids are gonna get me!" Inevitably, the kids would hate the new guys pretty much the same as they hated the old ones. Why? Because the second you exchange being "Us" for being "Them", you're lumped in with every single other "Them."
This is exactly the kind of thing that The Office does better than any show on TV: making us laugh at something recognizable. I empathized with Jim every single step of the way and by the end of the episode I, like Jim, had a little more insight into Michael's character. It was beautifully done.
But, back to Survivorman...
All right, listen, I'm not going to dwell on this. After last week's review turned me into the TV Squad equivalent of a bad guy wrestler, I understand that you guys are tired of hearing me whine that the show has stretched the character of Michael so far outside the realm of reality that sometimes I half expect it to be revealed that Bugs Bunny is the cartoonist behind it all. I think my point is valid (and indeed, when my interview with Creed Bratton is published next week, I think you'll be quite shocked to see what his opinion on the subject is), but I get it: you're annoyed at me harping on it.
So I won't. All I'm going to say is this: there were some funny moments (especially Dwight's shadowing of Michael), but ultimately the entire time Michael was out in the woods, I was shocked that this was the direction the writer (Steve Carell!?) decided to go in. It was wacky and ridiculous for no good reason. Personally, I thought good laughs could have been generated in a much easier-to-believe situation had Michael actually been invited to the retreat mentioned at the top of the episode. Seeing him interact with Ryan and the other branch managers in that situation would have been hilarious and believable, but, best of all, it would have allowed Jim's B story to remain exactly the same. My disappointment with the Survivorman stuff is made all the more profound by how good the rest of the episode was.
That's it. Just one paragraph to keep this review honest. If you have a different opinion, please let me know in the comments. Before you type what a dumb douche I am, remember: it's easy to be snarky when you're not in the hot seat. One day, though, I might go off on a horribly contrived trip to the woods and one of you might be put in as reviewer. Maybe you'd be wise to consider the lessons learned by our mutual fictional friend Jim tonight and maybe, possibly, write a reasoned response instead of an ad hominen attack?
Ah, who am I kidding? If you're my shrink and you're reading this, I'm gonna need two appointments this week.
Various Tidbits:
-- Stanley: "I took an extra shot of insulin in preparation of this cake today. If I don't have some cake soon, I might die."
Oscar: "Why don't you just have an apple?"
Stanley: "Why don't you just mind your business?"
-- I thought Jim's story tonight mirrored what Tim went through at the end of the first series of the UK Office. I'm excited that their taking him down this path because it finally gives John Krasinski something to do other than pine for Pam and raise his eyebrows. I also think that it lends further validity to the various theories being floated in the comments as to where the conflict is coming for Jim and Pam. Michael's response to Jim's statement that he won't be there in ten years -- "That's what I thought" -- was particularly ominous.
-- Going along with that, Jim's "That's what she said" was distressing as well. Not since John-Luc Picard stared out of the window at the end of the Best of Both Worlds two-parter have I felt a mixture of confusion and worry this profound.
-- Jim's dislike of Toby. It was funny, but what's the deal? Why does everyone hate Toby so much?
-- "Don't worry, the safey is..." click "...on."
-- Thank God for NBC going green tonight. I'm very happy that the problems with the environment were finally dealt with! I don't know what it was like in your area, but not minutes after NBC's Thursday lineup was finished airing, all of New Jersey exploded with life like it was just hit with the genesis device. And yes, that's two Star Trek references in the same column. I will now break a mirror out of disgust.
-- "They would call me the Overkill Killer."
-- Andy's reaction to the knowledge that there would be mushroom caps at the party. A lot of the commenters last week talked about how great Andy's reaction was when he found out that Jim had gotten into the Finer Things Club over him. You're right, I should have mentioned that last week. Andy is great week in and week out.
All right kids, that's it for tonight. According to Greg Daniels, we only have four more new episodes left "in the can" should the writer's strike continue. I don't know about you guys, but I'm hoping that this whole thing gets resolved sooner rather than later: I wouldn't put it past NBC combating the lack of scripted shows with 21 consecutive hours a week of Deal or No Deal. That's a world I don't want to live in.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
11-09-2007 @ 2:01AM
Zach said...
How did Michael spend a few hours in the woods and not notice Dwight and the documentary camera crew 100 feet away?
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 2:13AM
shawn said...
oh micheal was at his best tonight with the birthdays and the speech he gave to jim at the end :)
you are entitled to your opinion about the silliness of M.Scott. But he's always been a silly man
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 2:26AM
Nic said...
Wait, do you mean that the scariest situation that Les Stroud has ever faced was being on The View?
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 2:47AM
Blair M said...
I felt that this week's Michael antics were much more reasonable than previous episodes this season. He's acomplete tool who watched Survivorman and decided to mimic that in the terrible Pennsylvanian tundra. It's just like his Prison Mike was a terribly inaccurate caricature; he takes what he sees and tries to make it his own. Now, I've only seen a few episodes of Survivorman, but if I was asked to guess what Michal Scott might do had he seen Survivorman and been placed into this situation, it would've been damned close to what ended up on screen.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 2:56AM
Matt said...
How exciting it that Michael was wearing a BSG sweater when he came back at the end of the episode? Only makes me pine for the advance screening on November 12th.... 4 days never seemed never so far away!
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 3:32AM
DwightRocks said...
As a big survivorman fan I thought the parody was spot-on and hilarious.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 4:59AM
Bill said...
Ryan leaving Michael out? I'm not sure how much of that is douchebaggery on Ryan's part, and how much of it is... how would you manage a grown man who acts like a child? I have no idea. But it might be a legitimate tactic to treat him like garbage until he has some respect for your authority. I dunno.
As for the Toby-hate, I love it. That office would absolutely fall apart without him. Michael's insanity would cross the line (as it almost has, so many times), Dwight and Andy would be cheering him as he goes, Jim and Pam would sit back and laugh at it rather than do anything to stop it, and the rest of the office is too crazy/self-absorbed/soft-spoken/drunk to do anything about it. Toby is the single most important guy there. The voice of reason. A genuinely nice guy. Smart. Takes his job seriously without being a jerk about it. And all he does is take crap from everyone else for it. I find it hilarious.
#5: Presumably Michael was wearing the Battlestar sweatshirt because it was what Dwight had to give him, and Dwight is a well established fan.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 7:23AM
jerry said...
I think the ending exchange between Michael and Jim reminded me of the original series as well. I thought it was funny and sad at the same time. The camping stuff with Michael wasn't very funny and I couldn't wait till it got back to the other storyline.
No personal attacks from me but I rather enjoyed your reviews and feel the same way most of the time.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 7:31AM
RSL said...
Did no one else notice Toby's cosmetological changes to look more douchebaggy like Ryan? Really??
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 7:37AM
freefoo said...
I agree that Michael's antics are getting a bit too over-the-top, but on some level I could see him doing this: as long as he has a camera, he has an audience, even if he's by himself. But I liked your black-and-white cookie analysis. I remember last year people were split on whether the focus on the PB&J romance was the essential core of the show or simply dragged down it's comic sensibility. Maybe alternating between two different tones throughout an episode helps keep the show fresh and watchable more than we realize.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 7:41AM
Kim said...
I'm pretty sure that the hourlong eps of the Office at the beggining counted as 2 episodes each.. and I've read that next weeks episode is actually the last new one.
WOE.
That being said, I really enjoyed the episode. Even the bits with Michael in the woods.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 7:43AM
Bruno Camurati said...
Hi Jay. I´m from Brazil, and I read your reviews every week. I totally agree with you on the bad comedy decisions in this episode and the last 2 ones.. The Office is great when dealing with everyday situation (the DVD logo joke was the best!), but these stupid decisions from Michael are making me kind of tired.
Keep up the good work. Greetings from Rio.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 7:44AM
Cincinnati Mike said...
I don't think Jim dislikes Toby...I think it was one more aspect of Jim momentarily morphing into Michael.
And kudos to the Office for having the most organic (no pun intended) take on the whole in-your-face Green NBC thing. So organic as to be unnoticeable.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 8:00AM
Finkenwalde said...
Toby has a thing for Pam. It is pretty obvious, and that is why Jim isn't his biggest fan... And I noticed the new Toby look with the facial hair and general douchebaggery...
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 8:06AM
boomfoxx said...
#9 - I didn't think of Toby's facial hair as him trying to be like Ryan, although I suppose it could be a way to rebel against Michael. I figured it was because he was "rugged" from spending the night in the woods.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 8:40AM
joe Lion said...
i generally agree here, but i think there's a bigger pattern that's emerging over the past couple seasons. When the show started, it was almost exclusively inside the office, and that forced the writers to make office/relationship jokes, and it was really great. But lately, they've been getting away from that kind of humor and the biggest indication of that is that nearly every episode now has to have at least one major plot line that takes place outside of the office.
I think we're seeing a transformation like what The Simpsons went through in the 90s. When The Simpsons started, they almost all focused around Bart and Homer, and mostly took place inside the house and around Springfield. But i guess 10 years ago (i stopped watching it 5 years ago) every episode had to have something "big" in it - the family had to drive to NYC or drive to a casino or fly to Africa, or there had to be a celebrity guest on each episode. When they did this, they got away from their core humor.
The same thing is happening on The Office. I went back and read the 1 sentence descriptions of each episode on wikipedia and have found this trend:
Season 1 - I think all episode took place exclusively inside the office. The furthest they went (i think) is to the warehouse.
Season 2 - About 10 of the 22 episodes had major plots outside the office (
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 8:41AM
joe Lion said...
(continuing the previous comment that got cut off)
Season 2 - About 10 of the 22 episodes had major plots outside the office (
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 8:44AM
joe Lion said...
(crap - i have some characters being interpreted as HTML - moderators - can you delete comments 16 and 17?)
i generally agree here, but i think there's a bigger pattern that's emerging over the past couple seasons. When the show started, it was almost exclusively inside the office, and that forced the writers to make office/relationship jokes, and it was really great. But lately, they've been getting away from that kind of humor and the biggest indication of that is that nearly every episode now has to have at least one major plot line that takes place outside of the office.
I think we're seeing a transformation like what The Simpsons went through in the 90s. When The Simpsons started, they almost all focused around Bart and Homer, and mostly took place inside the house and around Springfield. But i guess 10 years ago (i stopped watching it 5 years ago) every episode had to have something "big" in it - the family had to drive to NYC or drive to a casino or fly to Africa, or there had to be a celebrity guest on each episode. When they did this, they got away from their core humor.
The same thing is happening on The Office. I went back and read the 1 sentence descriptions of each episode on wikipedia and have found this trend:
Season 1 - I think all episode took place exclusively inside the office. The furthest they went (i think) is to the warehouse.
Season 2 - About 10 of the 22 episodes had major plots outside the office (~50%)
Season 3 - 15-17 of the 22 episodes had major plots outside the office (75%)
Season 4 - EVERY EPISODE so far has taken the cast on adventures outside of the office, and it's clear that most of them haven't worked out for the better.
I totally agree that the best part of last night's episode took place completely inside the office walls. Occasionally the adventures outside the office yield some funny results, but generally they are not necessary, and that's not why i started watching this show....
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 8:53AM
Dan said...
First, I think Ryan excluded Mike because he was always creeped out by Mike's undisguised man-crush on him. I wouldn't invite someone like that out in the woods with me either.
Second, I loved the last scene where Mike and Jim had a moment. Mike seemed fairly human, and you could see that tho' he makes the best of his life, he didn't expect to be where he is in life when he was young and idealistic.
Third, NBC's whole "green" theme is ridiculous. At least 30 Rock made a stab at NBC by commenting on big business pretending to be green for the PR.
Finally--Creed is the best! I want to see more of him.
Reply
11-09-2007 @ 9:02AM
BStu said...
The thing about Michael is that not only is he really obsessed with popular culture, he actually HAS cameras following him all the time. That's only going to make him more deluded and out of touch. He has an excuse to look at TV as something real, because he is actually a part of it. He's like the obnoxious reality show contestant who's just trying to become a star and pissing everyone off in the process. He thinks what he sees on TV will work, because why wouldn't it? He's on camera, isn't he?
Reply