(S01E06) "I bet you haven't seen a movie made before 1983." - Tom, to Jaime
Does anyone else think that Jaime is sort of dumb? I mean, she's hot and can fight and seems to be an OK spy-type person, but there doesn't seem to be anything else going on up there. If she wasn't a spy, she'd be back at the bar, banging random dudes and drinking a lot and arguing with her sister all the time. The above quote from Tom illustrates that. I bet she's not really interested in anything and seems rather dull to me. Or maybe it's just the way Michelle Ryan is playing her. Did I mention she's hot?
I'm glad the show has gone in a different direction the past couple of weeks, introducing secret agent Tom and having him and Jaime go on assignments together. Yeah, it can sometimes go a little overboard with the cute banter, but I like that she has a good guy partner she can hang out with besides Antonio and Jonas. I can't wait until Sarah meets Tom. You know she's going to have some wiseass comment to make about his relationship with Jaime.
I liked this episode. No Katee Sackhoff, but it makes sense not to have her on every week. The bad guy here was quite good, and Nathan calling him "Casino Royale" made me chuckle out loud because I was thinking the same exact thing.
This whole list plot has been done before, on everything from the original I Spy series to the first Mission: Impossible flick. But it's a good plot. We got some good fight scenes, some good banter back and forth, and even got that international feel with a trip to Paris. I had to laugh though when Jaime looked out the hotel room window and said "wow, look at that view!" Which actually meant, "wow, look at that matte painting of the Eifffel Tower!" Why does every hotel room on TV shows overlook the Eiffel Tower?
I also had to shake my head at the whole "locked in the wine vault" scene (and why couldn't Jaime immediately knock down the door with her bionics?), and even Ruth said "getting locked in the wine vault is so cliche." At first I laughed and then I thought, are they just going to have self-aware one liners to joke away cliched scenes?
The subplot with the sister has gone from slightly annoying to completely annoying. Everytime they switched back to her damn party I felt like it was The O.C. or something, even if Jonas was involved later. We need more spy stuff and little sis to be sent to a boarding school in Switzerland.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
11-08-2007 @ 12:30AM
Oreo said...
"Does anyone else think that Jaime is sort of dumb? "
I think the 6+ million people that have ditched the show since the premiere agree with you 100%. She's an idiot. They should have just had the woman who plays Starbuck play the part instead.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 2:13AM
Midnight13 said...
This show is OK, its no "Alias", which I think this show more then anything (steals from) seems to remind me of. Everything from the heroine working for an organization against her will, to her finance dying. And this episode was very "Alias" reminescent. Two characters who are attracted to each other going undercover as husband and wife. The bit where Jamie had to look the man in the eye to confirm his identity with that spy technology. Maybe I liked this episode because it reminded me of "Alias".
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 2:30AM
comctrl6 said...
Before the show premiered, there were little "what is it about" specials on TV, in which they interviewed the show's writers / producers. The main thing they all said in those specials was "Jamie Summers is the portrayal of a true American woman."
I suppose the fake American accent, the excessive drinking and general slutty behavior really paints an accurate picture of an American woman. Maybe the writers of this show *should* be on strike more often, or maybe forever.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 8:23AM
Gill Garcia said...
Whew! Another missed episode watching and I am again all caught up by reading Bob's review! It sounds like I didn't miss much yet again.
Thanks for the update Bob! =)
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 9:04AM
Kaj said...
I was SO excited for this show, coming from David Eick and having Sackhoff as a regular (sort of)....I am now completely disappointed. Last night's ep was painful to watch. If it wasn't for the occasional Galactica guest stars (the main bad guy from last night plays a cylon on BSG), I'd ditch the show forever. I get more out of watching "Hotel Babylon" on BBC America than I do watching "Bionic Woman". (Wow - I can believe I just wrote that).
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 9:13AM
Tracey said...
I didn't lol at all during this episode, rather, I cringed. The writing is bad and the acting by Ryan is even worse. I'm ready to say with certainty that they miscast the lead character! Unfortunately her performance is so bad that even the work of the supporting actors, who are really good btw, aren't able to save this show for me. I found myself shaking my head during this episode (more than I usually do) at the portrayal of the lead and at some of the situations the writers put her in. If they were going to copy or do some of the things Alias did for example, they should have first started with making the Bionic Woman(spy) a tad smarter. For these reasons there is no emotional investment in the character/story and if you don't care about it, why watch? Blah. It's not a good sign when I noticed that I was actively paying more attention to scenes that excluded the title character, especially the side story with the sister which should be the boring part of the show. The creators should either keep the current format and make it a guilty pleasure for those that like Michele Ryan for her looks; or recast the part, improve the writing and market it as a younger version of Alias.
Ryan's fake accent doesn't bother me at all and I don't think about it as I watch, however, her portrayal of this stupid-American-girl-turned-bionic-spy is plain terrible. I gave this show a chance...
Click.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 9:51AM
Jimmy said...
I think I may actually give up on this show, which is such a shame since it had so much potential. The producers made a huge mistake in hiring Michelle Ryan -- huge! They would have been better off hiring Katee Sackhoff to play the lead, she would have been perfect in the role of Jaime Sommers -- perfect in all the right ways. While I like the addition of Tom, Jordan Bridges is a breath of fresh air, I'm not sure it's enough to save this series. With the writers' strike sure to shut the series down in a few weeks I doubt Bionic Woman survives -- unless the strike runs well into the new season and NBC has little else to put on the air.
For those who think this should should be better because David Eick is involved, I would say Battlestar Galactica owes it's limited cable to success to a great group of writers and especially Ron Moore. Along with Ira Steven Behr, Moore brought much of this BSG quality to the later seasons of Deep Space Nine, vastly improving that show. Anyone who's seen Eick's resume on IMdB would see a string of one failure after another.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 10:26AM
rick sossaman said...
ive had it with this crappy show. it should be cancelled
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 12:54PM
Jennifer said...
God, Jamie is dumb. The whole Rules thing, the whining about nine days (geez, what, you never dated before)- man, I was agreeing with Becca, for godsake.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 11:36AM
Oreo said...
It will be canceled after they run out of new episodes. The only way it will be saved is if the strike goes on for so long that they don't have any pilots for next season and need to bring all the shows from this season back.
But even then I think it would just be better to make a new gameshow.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 9:19PM
Andrea said...
I completely agree with the review.
Maybe I missed something, but why isn't Tom allowed to know that Jaime is bionic? He knows that the company goes after the bad guys, so why partial disclosure? I kept wanting to scream, "TELL HIM YOU'RE BIONIC!"
There were times that I thought he'd figure it out, such as when she jumped down onto the bad guy from the rooftop and Tom asked where she came from.
Maybe the show is best interpreted as a parody of the genre. Take the obvious bad wire stunts, the accent-switching from last episode, comments such as Ruth's "getting locked in the wine vault is so cliche.", and the view from the hotel, for example. Maybe if we looks at these as examples of self-referential bad, it will seem less bad.
Or maybe not. I highly doubt that David Eick set out to make something less than good but the viewing approach might make it more palatable.
I still want to like the show. While watching it last night I realized that even though it wasn't very good I still liked it better than I liked this week's episode of Heroes and I still like BW better than this season of Heroes.
(I specifically say that "I liked it better" not "It was better" because it's subjective and debatable.)
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 4:04PM
CJ said...
The show is not gaining any speed with me. The sister seems like such throwaway plots, but I did like Jonas's way of handling her and his calm phone call at the Police Station authorizing 8 million dollars. Very cool. Jaimie and the sister seem to the worst characters so far. Should've made Jaimie english, she was so much more natural with her accent. Could have had some story that the sisters were raised in different countries or something, would add or even explain the rift between them. But too late for that.
Any one else catch the Battlestar actor of the week?
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 12:46PM
keithnl said...
Yeah I so wanted to like this show, but I've got this episode on my PVR and I can't bring myself to watch it.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 12:55PM
sitruc said...
I watched some of the show last night. I didn't really pay attention to the missing plot or anything. Was it just me or were the wires and harnesses more visible last night? I guess the less I care, the less they care.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 2:46PM
mb said...
Someone at NBC should stick a fork in this show, because it's way past done. It's practically burnt.
Let's see:
- Bad acting by a bad actress? Check.
- Bad writing on top of that? Check.
- Poor production values by a producer who does better elsewhere? Check!
- Inability of this poster to think of anything else to criticize? Check.
I do have to say that I cringe anytime Jamie jumps through the air because her legs are STILL running in mid-flight, looking stupid. And although that younger sister is a hot-lookalike for Winnie Cooper (Wonder Years), her entire sub-plot is brutally painful to watch.
David Eick might have to bring ALL of the BSG cast over to save this sinking ship.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 2:54PM
kevjohn said...
I missed this episode. Judging from what I've read here, I didn't miss much.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 3:24PM
Vito said...
I agree that the show started off slow (OK...it started off sucky) but the last 2 episodes have definitely been better (I mean, it had no where to go but up but still).
Tom is a good addition (great work by the actor). I hate Antonio...I think his character adds nothing. I ESPECIALLY hate the sister, even though she was the least annoying that she's ever been this episode.
We all complain that studios make too quick judgments on shows. Strike aside, I hope NBC gives this show a chance and I hope the show's producers use that chance effectively.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 3:42PM
tom2ytx said...
Isn't "Chuck" already on TV? Does NBC really need another spy show with cute banter? With the BSG pedigree I expected this show to be a much darker and better written update of the original. At the very least, I expected the acting would be.
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 3:49PM
jaerisk said...
this show blows so bad it's not funny, and its ashame because I was looking forward to it all summer(even though I'd already seen the crummy first episode) did I mention this show blows?
Reply
11-08-2007 @ 4:00PM
LC said...
The only good thing to come from this show IMO was that I probably would have never taken a look at Life which airs after it.
Another case of the follow up show being superior to its lead in.
Reply