(S01E02) Last week's review was not a kind one. I would have called Cavemen a train wreck, except that at least after a train wreck the survivors can begin to pull their lives together and learn to live again. My feeling last week was there was no such recovery possible after an episode of Cavemen.A lot of the commentators came to the show's defense. There were cries of "it's not that bad" and "it could have been worse!" Not exactly ringing endorsements, but not the universal condemnation that I had been expecting, either. It took the careful consideration of both those comments and tonight's episode for me to figure out what, exactly, was wrong with this show...
Here's the problem with Cavemen: it doesn't need the cavemen. If you take them out, what you're left with is a show that's "not that bad" or a show that "could have been worse." It becomes a fairly forgettable single-camera comedy that could probably exist for a few years, getting its share of viewers and maybe, if it was lucky, an Entertainment Weekly cover when it finally goes off the air in 2012.
What kills the show is the inclusion of the cavemen.
It's kind of like if you threw a party and one of your friends asked if he could invite one of his pals from work. He says nothing about the guy except that he's "nice" and you say sure, no problem, the more the merrier. When the friend from work shows up, he's kind of bland. He wears a polo-shirt tucked in, but with the collar unbuttoned, he tells a few jokes, but isn't obnoxious about it, and he converses fairly well without necessarily being Larry King. At the end of the night, you shake his hand and say "thanks for coming!' and when your friend asks you what you thought of him, you say: "he was so nice!"
Now, imagine the same scenario except that your friend built him up as "The coolest guy at the office. Seriously, my friend, this is a different breed of cat! He's the bee's knees! He's got some serious sizzle on him! He's gonna knock your socks into another dimension! We're talking crazy cool!"
Simply from the build-up you'd hate the guy (you'd also probably wonder why your friend was talking in such weird '40s slang as well, but that's neither here nor there). When he showed to the party, you'd be looking for what made him so special. When he turned out to be just a generally nice, non-threatening guy, you'd be disappointed. You'd angrily tell your friend, "Hey man, thanks for bringing George BLANDa. Nice call on how cool he was!"
It's all in the buildup.
Cavemen has been built up as something special. Not necessarily in the marketing, but simply because it chose to make its main characters four of the ugliest cavemen in the history of filmed entertainment. Just looking at the show, you're inclined to think that it's going to be clever and cool (or, at the very least different).
When it's not, you respond with the kind of review I wrote last week.
Tonight's episode is a perfect example of the cavemen being extraneous to the action. The central premise to the show was that Nick was a bad employee and that his friend, Joel, was forced to come to a decision whether or not to fire him. That's it. It's a classic sitcom setup and it was executed fairly well (I especially enjoyed the bit during arbitration when Nick was forced to watch security camera tapes to prove what a bad employee he was).
Did it make it any funnier that they were cavemen? No. In fact, whenever they go to the cavemen well, the show went off the rails:
-- The crux of Nick's wrongful termination suit played the cavemen-as-minority card again, and not even the most ardent defender of the show would be able to argue that it did so cleverly.
-- Andy trying to get the new neighbor to not be afraid of him. It was not only underdeveloped -- almost like the writers needed a B-story but didn't have their hearts in it -- it was poorly conceived. I guess in this world there are some people who are afraid of cavemen (we're not sure because no rules have been set up) and Andy is determined to show her that he's not a bad guy. His solution? A home invasion. Ahh, yes, that old sitcom trope. Remember when Lucy and Ethel put on Clockwork Orange outfits and went on a multi-state crime spree? That was classic. If this is how cavemen go about getting people to like them, I'd be scared of them too.
This is my advice to ABC: go back over the shows that have been filmed and digitally alter the four leads so that they're not cavemen anymore. Dub any of the cavemen/racial stuff into a new nationality that isn't offensive (The Simpsons have been getting away with mockery of the Irish, Italians and Germans for years; maybe try those). From this point forward, film the show exactly as-is, with the same character types living the same kind of lifestyle, but just have them, you know, not be cavemen.
You can even keep the name Cavemen. It'll be a reference to their backward male way of looking at things. I'm told ladies love it when you point out how dumb men are!
If you do this, I think you'll have a nice, likable show on your hands. If you don't... well, I can't imagine the show lasting past the morbid curiosity phase. But then, what do I know? I'm an Irishman.
Some other things:
-- I called Nick obnoxious in the first episode. He still is, but I'll admit that he made me laugh a few times tonight. Maybe it's because I've known quite a few annoying grad-students in my time and whenever he's talking about his non-existent Ph.D., I'm reminded of those people.
-- Nick is an Apple guy. He and I have that in common. Oh, and also being extremely, sickeningly hairy. (Isn't my wife lucky?)
-- Is it me or did some of the bits seem out of place tonight? I'm thinking most specifically of Joel's boss and his attorney having trouble getting the VCR to work. I guess that people do, sometimes, have trouble getting VCRs to work, but it just seemed an awkward bit ham-handed into the scene unnecessarily. It was almost like the episode ran forty seconds short and they needed to come up with something at the last minute.
-- Why is Andy there? I know he was a character added after the disastrous first pilot, so the producers had to have had a reason for his existence, but geez: we're already two episodes in and he's in a pointless time-killing B-story.
-- Does anyone else wonder if the cavemen have superpowers? Are they extra strong? Can they withstand cold better than we can? Could they bed Barbara Bach and play the drum solo in The End?
All right, that's it for this week. We're uncertain whether there's enough sustainable interest in this show to warrant a weekly review, so this might be my last dispatch from mediocreville. If it is, it was a pleasure reviewing this show for you. Not because I liked it, but because I feel like I've grown so close to you, the readers of this blog. We're war buddies, surviving as best we can. To paraphrase what Iceman once very creepily said to Maverick (video NSFW), you readers can be my wingmen anytime.
As always, I invite you to a much better show on Thursday nights called The Office. Really, it's much more pleasant.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-10-2007 @ 10:15AM
John Hewitt said...
I don't want to defend the "Can't work a VCR" issue, but I think it was supposed to reflect on the cavement, that any one of the cavemen could have worked the VCR but these "normal" people can't handle it.
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 11:09AM
jccalhoun said...
So far in two episodes they have had the same message: "Racism doesn't exist and people who claim to be victims of racism are overreacting."
That's some liberal media we got here, huh?
Call me crazy but I think it would be a lot more interesting to have the show really be about racism. Have normal humans really be racist and say bigoted things about and to the cavemen. Without that, you are right, there isn't any reason to have actual cavemen in the show.
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 11:13AM
Natalie said...
I agree, stop wasting your time reviewing this awful show. You should review Carpoolers instead. Now that's a funny show!
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 11:35AM
Frank said...
1. I hope "Natalie" is joking... I can't imagine how anyone could think Cavemen is a waste of time, but love the similarly pointless, generic comedic of Carpoolers...
2. I think you nailed what's wrong with the show Jay.
3. I have to admit that closing bit was a good one though. The two guys "acting" like cavemen to scare off the girl who had gotten annoying ("It's biscotti, it's supposed to be hard")
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 12:36PM
Jeffrey Lipsey said...
The show was funny, but some of the comedic techniques that made the first show more highbrow were replaced with more elements that are all too typical.
"Cavemen’s humor stems from sophistication and elegant satire, not exaggerated acting. What really sells the show is that you believe the fiction as a plausible reality."
http://lamererun.com/2007/10/09/cavemen-off-character-humor-an-issue-but-not-extinct-yet/
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 1:19PM
Cody said...
I like when the original caveman from the Geico ads is in it. He adds a bit of absurdist humor to the show, such as speaking Russian for no reason, which is right up my alley. Nick, Joel, and Andy are all pretty extraneous though.
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 1:54PM
shawn said...
this show is bad, but carpoolers is worse.
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 3:15PM
Nathaniel said...
Buildup??? You call the overwhelmingly negative press this show got before airing buildup??? If anyone came into that first episode expecting a highly original or "clever" show then they must not having been paying attention to the press. I say get over it and stop watching because your views aren't doing anyone any justice. Not trying to be harsh, just letting you know how you're coming off.
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 3:30PM
samodernist said...
It's funny I told my wife the same thing after watching 15 mins. of it last night. They might as well just make the 3 or 4 caveman leads plain old regular guys who are roomates. The Caveman issue really is not played up esp. with the fancy apartment, and absurd sophistication of them. It is too slapsticky compared to the adds that were a bit darker and more sarcastic in nature. The only difference between this show and most cliche guy roomate sitcoms is the amount of hair and the occasional race card issues (which really is the least funny/plausable concept in the show)
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 3:52PM
Cole said...
I think you touched the real problem here. The hook of Cavemen being a comedy is that these interesting and odd-looking group are actually "normal". So when you get past that (which we all did in the Geico commercials") then where do you go from there?
To me the show was dead from the start. But if they want to make it worthwhile then maybe they should've just had Cavemen acting like cavemen in the big city like Beverly Hillbillies. Or have it about cavemen adapting to modern times after they get time-machine'd into the future. But what they got are cavemen proving they are just as boring as everyone else. Whoopee.
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 4:33PM
samodernist said...
Excellent point Cole - this is hardly the fish out of water concept people would expect like the Beverly Hill Billies or that early 90's movie with Brendan Fraser or the French film Les Visitours (with Jean Reno)...overcoming obstacles of culture, class, and technology in amusing ways.
The tiny visual details the show tries to empasize as being cavemanish (rock mallets from last night, or the petroglyph in the fancy apartment) end up wasted as trite attempts at humor in the details...
Reply
10-10-2007 @ 5:23PM
"Natalie" said...
I think that "Frank" needs to get his sense of humor in check. Excuse me for having an opinion. I happen to like Carpoolers. I laughed out loud multiple times, unlike Cavemen where I almost pulled out my hair. I read this website every single day and very rarely post a comment. Thanks for shootin me down, "Frank".
Cavemen, crappy. Carpoolers, cool.
Reply
10-11-2007 @ 5:13AM
Will said...
This is quite possibly the worst sitcom I've ever seen. I watched the first episode to see if it was as bad as some of the early reviews I'd read; it was. I watched the sencod episode between commercial breaks of the History channel's making aluminum, that show was much more entertaining. Really, I see nothing new here, the 'Nick gets a job at the store' storyline was predictable and boring and I didn't so much as smile at anything in the first 2 shows. I won't be tuning in again.
Reply
10-12-2007 @ 9:39PM
mj said...
Phil Hartman did a better job on SNL as a caveman lawyer. Slimy, well dressed, and not above using the "I'm just a caveman" line. The Geico guys were cool. These guys need to just go away.
Reply
10-15-2007 @ 4:01PM
A Viewer said...
I would like to echo the thoughts of Natalie and a few others. Review "Carppolers" instead of this show. Are you even watching "Carpoolers?" If you were, you'd know that that show is very funny, and if you're not, I would recommend that you start because it might be one of the most under-rated new shows of the season. Some critics panned it, but I say, give it a chance. You should too.
I've given "Cavemen" a chance. I watched the first two episodes and did not laugh once. Honestly, I swear. It was one of the least funny shows that I've seen, and it is supposed to be a comedy. It was terrible. Bad acting, bad concept, bad writing...
I also agree about the idea that the "cavemen" thing is superfluous. It would make no difference whether they were cavemen or not, with the direction the plot is taking. But that is the premise of the show, and they can't just change that. No matter; they'll just be cancelled anyway. I won't be watching anymore. It was a waste of an hour of my time to watch it in its first few eeks. "Carpoolers?" Now that was a funny show; I hope that it doesn't lose tons of viewers just because "Cavemen" tanks.
Actually, "Cavemen" did have one redeeming factor: that blonde was pretty hot.
Reply