
(S01E03) "Just get me out of here." - Ellen
Um... what changed? It's not that this episode was bad, but there was a huge drop off between this week and last week in terms of tension. As a viewer, the last two episodes made me feel nervous and anxious. Not so much this time. Nothing about this episode really made me gasp or jump out of my seat. It was just a lot of what we already knew, with some extra info thrown in. The biggest issue? Way too much of the episode was devoted to Patty's misfit son. Unless something is switched around, he means nothing to the story as a whole.
So he sent the grenade to Patty and planted the second one in Phil's glove compartment. How predictable was that? The fact that it was so obvious that he was behind it rendered the truth as being completely anti-climactic. I loved all the little hints we got from Frobisher throughout the episode suggesting that he may have been behind the grenade threats. I wish he had been! Seeing the episode close with him palming another grenade and smirking... or something like that would have been great in my opinion.
My point? When does Arthur finally become the bad guy? Or maybe he doesn't? If that's the case, when does Patty become the bad guy? She never will in my eyes as long as they keep humanizing her with all this sentimental "my family is falling apart" business. We're three episodes in and I still don't know who I'm rooting for. I'm loving this show, but viewers need some direction. If the ambiguity keeps up, people are going to lose interest. Take a cue from Tom and his frustrations with Patty sidelining him. We need something bigger to sink our teeth into.
What did we learn? Simple things, that while interesting, don't necessarily make up for the slow pacing of the rest of the episode. We know Greg (Katie's Florida fling) is now married and became some kind of consultant. While Tom hasn't found anything yet, I'm sure there's a Frobisher connection buried in there somewhere. We know Ellen brought on Hollis Nye as her lawyer and not Patty. That has to mean something. We know that Ellen and David eventually called off the engagement. The question is why? Again, I'm quite certain that too will have ties to the case and David's disgust that Ellen got Katie involved.
But who killed David? For the first time in the flashbacks, we finally saw a third party in the apartment. Someone was attacking Ellen with a knife. That doesn't mean it was David's killer though. Unless it wasn't a third party and David was the one with the knife? If that was the case, Ellen would be safe in saying she didn't murder David but rather that she was merely protecting herself out of self-defense.
Beyond all those questions, it was very much a Patty-centric episode and I'm really not sure that I care about her home life too much. She's afraid of dying. She cries in her husband's arms and worries for his safety and then turns around and sets her son up to be kidnapped in an effort to knock some sense into him. Well which is it? Is she compassionate or ruthless? I'm starting to chafe down below from sitting on this fence.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-08-2007 @ 10:07AM
Morjana Coffman said...
Regarding: "We know Greg (Katie's Florida fling) is now married and became some kind of consultant. While Tom hasn't found anything yet, I'm sure there's a Frobisher connection buried in there somewhere."
No one has investigated Greg's wife. Perhaps SHE's the one that is connected to Frobisher.
Interesting series, but it needs something more to keep me tuned it. I'll watch next week but if it's like this week's episode...
Morjana
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 10:08AM
Gordy said...
I can't help but think about The Nine when I watch Damages. I mean, eventually I am gonna get sick of the now vs. then flashbacks/forwards.
For now, it's okay, but I just need them to focus on how the fiance (or not) gets killed. DO NOT [!] take me into a season finale still wondering what happened. The Nine tried that.
But the suspense was a bit lower this episode. I was sure the husband's car was going to explode.
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 11:04PM
cs0875 said...
I actually like how we don't have someone to root for, other than Ellen. It makes it more middle of the road, more real.
Not many people in Frobisher or Pattys positions are truly evil. They do evil things, but for non-evil reason. Patty may stoop to anything to win a case, including hurting and manipulating people, and even ruining a few lives. Those are evil acts, but she feels a few ruined lives is worth helping hundreds of clients whose life savings was thrown away. That doesn't make it better, but she is doing what she thinks is best, as misguided as it is. Frobisher obviously loves his kids, and did what he thought was best for him and his family, even that means ruining many of his employees lives. These are real people who do bad things, not heartless evil people who do no good.
I do agree I wasn't as dissapointed when the show was over (in a good way, I wanted to see more) than I was the first episodes when I couldn't wait till next week. But in the scenes for future episodes we see Katie say something to the police telling them to "talk to Patty Hewes". That could be interesting.
And finally, I have a feeling their son has something to do with it, there is a reason they focused on him this week, and I don't think it was to humanize Patty. Maybe her son kills Ellens fiance?
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 11:56AM
MacGuffin said...
I agree. The show kinda lost its mojo this week.
The thing I like about this show is that it seems to give you only what is needed to drive the plot forward. Nothing extra.
But this week blows that idea away. Unless, of course, these extra nuggets of information actually add to what we are going to see next.
Reply
8-08-2007 @ 11:57AM
Jim said...
Toomey, I have to agree with you on one thing: This episode lacked "something" that was there in the first two. I don't know what it was exactly, but the tone was definitely different.
I think you are wrong, though, in assuming the son won't have anything to do with the story going forward.
Technically speaking, I was bothered by the outdoor scene with Katie and Greg -- the sound was off, or maybe it was a bad re-dub. Did anyone else notice?
Reply
8-09-2007 @ 7:46AM
Lisdog said...
Am I the only one that thinks Ellen was some sort of plant? Patty expects her first year lawyer to write a crappy brief and Tom says it was basically perfect. I think these first few episodes are slight of hand and many characters will turn out to be other than what we expexted.
Reply
8-09-2007 @ 7:47AM
Bill said...
"When does Arthur finally become the bad guy? Or maybe he doesn't? If that's the case, when does Patty become the bad guy?"
I kinda figured that when she had a dog killed and he took out a hit, it was firmly established that they are both the bad guys.
Reply
8-09-2007 @ 3:52PM
Ig said...
I really love this show but everytime I think about it the first thing that comes to mind is how it reminds me of The Devil Wears Prada but in a lawyer's world.
Reply
8-10-2007 @ 8:12AM
Lindsay said...
Patty can't be the bad guy because she loves her husband, and gets upset when he's in a car accident? People aren't that black and white.
I'm enjoying seeing two potential "bad guys" on TV who actually have shades of grey. These are three dimensional characters, rather than the ridiculous stereotypes we see more often on TV and in movies. I don't want to see Patty lose all her humanity. Where's the conflict there? What would be interesting about that?
Reply
8-13-2007 @ 5:29PM
Dan Chichian said...
Maybe i am missing something but aren't we supposed to be rooting for Ellen? Frobisher is sleazy even without the theft and Patty is just as bad. She is playing major head games with Ellen including having the judge's secretary keep her there when she was supposed to be at her engagement party. I say games because the tactic did not gain her anything.
I kind of thought the Frobisher actually did mail the grenade and the son latched onto the idea and put the one in the car. Didn't Patty say something about a kid being able to buy "a grenade" singular and not "grenades"?
Reply
8-14-2007 @ 5:38PM
Mueller02 said...
In the flash back at the end, where we learned a little bit more about the murder, you see a dog barking, and I'm 90% sure that it is Patty's dog. The same one she had in the office, and the same one she had at the park.
And can I just point out, that the relationship she has with her husband is so far off the mark from reality, that it is shameful. She fires employees who take personal time off, after a bomb scare. She claims that Ellen isn't really dedicated, so the fact that she has a real relationship with her husband is pretty corny to me. And the son with the bombs was totally predictable, as was Patty being responsible for killing Saffron. If you've seen any of the ALIAS episodes, you would be figuring this show out. I like it, but still predictable. We'll see what tonight brings.
Reply
8-15-2007 @ 3:50PM
sally said...
anyone know what kind of car patty's husband was driving (crashing)?
Reply