(S01E22) I've been wondering all week how Aaron Sorkin would send his final F-U to the NBC brass. I mean when this episode was made, the writing was very clearly on the wall: Studio 60 was dead in the water. So, the question is, if you're a writer/producer with nearly unlimited power regarding the production of a newly canceled show, what do you do in the last episode to turn a big fat middle finger up at the network who canceled you? Do you end on an unresolvable cliff-hanger? Do you turn in a sub-par episode? Do you break down all pretense of the fourth-wall and cancel the show within the show?What do you do? How do you really stick it to NBC?
Well, in the case of Aaron Sorkin, what you do is turn every single feel-good emotion up to about 31 out of 10, then end with the same goose-bumps inducing promise of the pilot. Sorkin, you magnificent bastard, you just hooked me all over again for a show that'll never have another episode produced!
Let's be honest up at the front: this was not a perfect episode. There was way too much convenient closure (especially with the Matt and Harriet relationship) and the "feel good" meter was so off the charts that it made Lady and the Tramp II: Scamps Adventure look like Leaving Las Vegas. But, responsibility as a reviewer aside, I really don't think that it's worth nitpicking those things. It's like whenever the oldest relative at a wedding gives a teary-eyed cliched filled speech: it's never perfectly written, but no one cares because they're too busy wiping their own tears aside and giving the speech a standing O.
That's how I feel about tonight's episode. A flawed, but fitting goodbye to a show that we will probably not see the likes of again for some time.
A couple of things about the show tonight:
1) So, Bradley Whitford's getting an Emmy, right? I'm throwing down the gauntlet right now for our commentators. Give me a performance from a male lead this year that was better than what Bradley Whitford has done with Danny Tripp.
Of all the major story lines that were running tonight (and I put the estimate conservatively at 23,000), the hospital story was the most compelling. As I've said in the past, it might be my own impending fatherhood, but I was moved by the power of Whitford's acting in those scenes.
As a side note to all doctors everywhere: only use the phrase "I need to talk to you" when something really bad is about to happen. Actually, as I think about it, that should be general advice to all humans. Every time I hear that phrase, my stomach drops and I'm expecting news of a brain tumor or that my wife has decided to leave me for a rodeo clown (and considering that she's married to a blogger, that'd be a step-up).
I think that Sorkin cheated a bit to have the act break be the doctor very seriously asking Danny to talk with him in the other room (I mean, the entire reason for it is to build false suspense), but I think it's a testament to the characters he's created that my wife spent the entire commercial break hitting me on the arm and screaming, "He can't kill Jordan! He just can't!" There was even a small dark part of me that was actually kind of hoping Jordan was dead just to see if my wife would have thrown the remote through the center of the TV set. Thankfully, though, it worked out for everybody.
2) Jack Rudolph -- the character I'm most sorry to see go. Not because I necessarily liked him more than the other characters (as it's been pointed out in the comments of late, I seem to have a mildly disturbing obsession with Timothy Busfield), but because the growth he showed in this episode felt compressed and rushed. It was still great to watch him come around on Simon's apology, but I really wish that we had a few seasons to spend with Jack to watch the interplay between his humanity and his network monomania.
3) Tom's brother. I still don't think that Captain Boyle was anything more than a slightly quirky jerk-face (seriously, of all the payoffs that happened in this episode, couldn't we have gotten some insight as to why this guy was selected as a grief counselor?), but aside from that, it was still a nice moment when Tom got the phone. Kudos to Nate Corddry for another fine performance.
4) Harriet and Matt. Wow. Okay. So... they got together. And, uh... well, I guess if I was going to nitpick (which I'm not), I'd say that of all the resolutions, this felt most rushed. Again, if I was going to nitpick, I'd also point out that it was just a few hours ago (in the show's timeline) that Matt was making kissy-faces at the super-high-I.Q. lawyer. Oh and one more thing: Matt was also, just a few hours ago, popping Flintstone Vitamin encrusted Percoset and that according to Danny he's due for a crazy depressive crash annnnnnnnnnnny second now.
But I'm not going to bring those things up because I'm not going to nitpick. Sure it was a little forced, but at least they wound up together. And besides, I really enjoyed them asking each of the cast members if they were okay with their relationship. It's one of those workplace family moments that Sorkin does so well and it worked for me, so we'll ignore all that other stuff.
5) Matt and Danny. God, their conversastion killed me at the end. "I love you too, brother." I'm a sucker for male-bonding stuff ("You can be my wingman anytime", "Apollo was like my son... I raised him... and when he died, a part of me died... but now you're the one...", "Are you crazy? The fall will probably kill you," and so on and so on) so this was "dust-in-the-room" time for me.
A couple of notes about the series itself:
1) I've been thinking about this for a few weeks and I realize it's completely stupid, but hear me out on it: I think this show is Sorkin's Jackie Brown. Think about it. Both Tarantino and Sorkin are visionary writers who changed the landscape of the mediums they worked in and who both sort've shanked one on their third try. Sports Night was like Reservoir Dogs -- small, critically acclaimed, but largely cult endeavors. Then both of them hit huge with their sophomore efforts, Tarantino with Pulp Fiction and Sorkin with The West Wing. With two solid successes under their belts the buzz and hype for their third projects were off the charts. If you look at the negative criticism of Jackie Brown, you'll notice that a lot of the writers thought that Tarantino had become a parody of himself and that the crackling dialog that was so good in Pulp Fiction was rote and forced in Jackie Brown... just like the negative criticism that Sorkin has been getting with Studio 60.
One only hopes that Sorkin's fourth television outing will have Sarah Paulson back as an unnamed sketch star who systemically seeks revenge on all the stupid bloggers who wrote that her character was insufferable. Incidentally, I hope that my character gets played by Michael Madsen.
2) Speaking of Sarah Paulson, I think that we all owe her an apology. I mean, sure we hated Harriet (and by hate I mean we all wished her character would get stabbed like the host of Cheaters did a few years ago), but it was entirely unfair that some of that hate spilled out onto Sarah Paulson. She's a talented and beautiful woman who didn't deserve the bile we spewed at her week in and week out. I mean sure, the character that she played was one of the seven or eight worst written characters in the history of television, but it's not her fault that she was given so little to work with.
3) I read an article recently that used John from Cincinnati, The Sopranos finale, and Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip as examples of why network notes are not as bad as artistic types make them out to be. Essentially, the article said that the outrage and disappointment and befuddlement that these shows were met with prove that the network execs might be worth listening to as a way to satiate a fanbase.
And while I agree with the basic premise of the article, I can't help but admire what Milich and Chase and Sorkin have managed to do. They used their power and influence to bend one of the least malleable industries in the world to their will. Even if it was just for a brief window, they were able to use the billion-dollar apparatus of a network TV show to make their vision come to life. And though their shows are either over (Chase), critically panned and misunderstood (Milich) or burned off in the summer months when no one is watching (Sorkin), I think they proved without a doubt that a flawed masterpiece is a lot more interesting than a polished turd any day of the week.
We'll miss you Aaron, stay in touch.
In related news, According to Jim has been picked up for another season...















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
6-29-2007 @ 7:13AM
Bill said...
yup - I really enjoyed the finale - and it brought a tear to my eye too! A real shame that this series is at an end
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 8:25AM
chip chanko said...
As to the Jackie Brown-ness of S60, where would A Few Good Men and American President stand in Sorkin's oeuvre? His pre-reservoir dogs student film hits?
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 8:32AM
Ryan said...
"Give me a performance from a male lead this year that was better than what Bradley Whitford has done with Danny Tripp."
Um... Matthew Perry as Matt Albie. Seriously.
I'm not overly sad that the show is done, especially with a finale that DID provide closure to all the important storylines, but one thing I'm really really going to miss are the characters of Danny Tripp and Matt Albie. Together they were just freakin' awesome.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 8:49AM
segsig said...
I'd love to see Mr. Whitford get an emmy the year after the show was cancelled! It would be a second time for WB (China Beach did that).
I will miss this show, but my dvd is already pre-ordered.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 9:01AM
thawtful1 said...
After last night's episode, I think Bradley Whitford deserves an Emmy for acting (with which he's done a stunning job this year) AND an Emmy for directing. The man is an actor's director. The performances last night were the best of the series plus the camera work really helped to convey those emotions to the audience.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 9:03AM
Pranav said...
I thought the whole K&R 4-part series was amazing. I really loved the final ending. And I agree that BW deserves an award for this.
Harriet does annoy the crap out of me. She's so self absorbed, I don't know what Matt sees in her. In the hospital, when Matt meets up with Danny, Harriet wakes up and basically says "No one cares about how I'm doing" (I can't remember the exact quotes) ...even though both the guys are worrying about Jordan and Tom's brother - she's busy teaching how to pray and making funny voices.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 9:16AM
David said...
Sorkin ends his shows well. Sports Night had two great finale episodes, and this was very nicely done for a show that isn't that great. I wish he could have ened West Wing the way he wanted.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 9:25AM
Egan Foote said...
Alas, "Studio 60" goes the way of "The Nine." See you soon, Nate Corrdry.
Egan, out.
http://eganfoote.wordpress.com
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 9:32AM
Mike Davis said...
Uh...nope.
Still hate Sarah Paulson.
Sorry.
Peace.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 9:37AM
David said...
I'll disagree with your point about notes from network execs. David Milch shouldn't listen to anyone (except the demons in his head from all those drugs). Deadwood and JFC would be poorer shows if he let network execs give notes. (Do they do that at HBO? I kind of doubt it. Chris "I like to beat women" Albrecht doesnt seem the network note type, but I don't really know.)
I'll agree with your point on the Jack Rudolph character porrtrayed by Tim Daly... er... wait... no... the other one ... Steven Weber. It was a more complex character than the others on the show, and I found myself consistently liking scenes he was in. (Parumph NV anyone?)
I hope Aaron Sorkin takes about 5 years away from TV script writing, then comes back with something new and exciting (and without a single member of the WW or S60 cast, please -- want to buy new acting troupe!)
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:53AM
Jamie said...
Announcing an Aaron Sorkin show has been canceled is like announcing the NHL is on strike. You are sure someone cares, you just can't imagine who.
I gave the show four episodes. I could not get over the preachy self-importance of people putting together a frivolous sketch comedy show. It was impossible to take STUDIO 60 seriously. I suspect fans that did were doing so only because a failed show here would keep Sorkin out of television for a good while.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 9:59AM
Molly D. said...
As a soon to be doc, let me tell you that the medical writing was all wrong, that the doctor was unmistakeably incorrect in most everything he did. He would have caught that pre-E (preeclampsia) much earlier and no one calls it "intravascular coagulation", it's always just DIC.
Sorkin never quites get the banter right (hasn't on any of the shows where he's had medicine play a part- see, Donna's "DVT" in Season 6 for plodding dialogue).
Hear that, AARON? I challenge you to write a good medical show and hire me as consultant.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:01AM
Dave said...
This show, and this episode in particular, was bad. Way too tidy in wrapping up every storyline. Happy endings all around! There was never any chemistry between Matt & Harriet, or between Danny and Jordan. Both of those relationships were forced and never worked. Subsequently, Whitford's "wonderful acting" in the hospital had no basis for authenticity.
I loved A Few Good Men, The American President, and Sports Night, so I thought I liked Sorkin's work. But I couldn't stomach The West Wing because of his politics. S60 would have driven me away for the same thing if the show had continued. Way out of place on a show about a show that has nothing to do with politics. (But it was nice to see Harriet calling Matt on his hypocrisy for his politics.)
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Sorkin doesn't like George W. Bush and the war in Iraq. Sheesh! Rant after rant about the war. We get it Aaron! You disapprove!
Aaron Sorkin has no idea how to write for a Christian. He perpetuates the charicatures of religion and mocks those who believe something other than he does. If Harriet were actually as devout as she was supposed to be, she would not make a big deal out of praying and "teaching" others how to do it. She would just do it. And she would not be bed-hopping along with the rest of Hollywood. Sorkin just picks the parts of religion he wants to poke fun at and ignores the rest.
Studio 60 could have been a great show. If only Sorkin could have refrained from commentary on religion and politcs. Don't preach to me Aaron, just entertain me. Something S60 couldn't do regularly.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:03AM
Karl said...
Harriet Hayes is the Wesley Crusher of Studio 60. It remains to be seen if Sarah Paulson is the Wil Wheaton.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:08AM
MacGuffin said...
I'm glad that Sorkin tied everything up with a nice bow. For us die hard viewers who stuck with him, we all wanted to see this resolved, even if it was a little trite.
I, too, agree that Bradley Whitford deserves an Emmy for what he has done with Danny Tripp. No one can play the tough guy character that is really a big softie better than Whitford. He has emerged as one of my favorite actors, which is funny because I used to hate him because some of his early roles were such whiners.
Hopefully Sorkin can take on another genre with the same material and delve into that. I think the big problem with Studio 60 is that that arena isn't all that interesting for the majority of viewers. Whereas politics was in TWW.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:13AM
MacGuffin said...
Dave #12 . . . "If only Sorkin could have refrained from commentary on religion and politics."
Are you kidding me? If Sorkin refrained from commentary on religion and politics it wouldn't be Sorkin.
I don't think this show necessarily appealed to "Christians" at all. It mocked them. Regularly. And, as far as I care, rightly so.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:22AM
dave.birinyi said...
I liked the 4th wall bending line, "Go back to the theater." It stuck out as peculiar that Danny would refer to the studio as the theater, but it makes perfect sense if it's actually Thommy Schlamme telling Sorkin to go back to the stage.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:23AM
Ozzyols said...
Ditto on the nomination for Brad both as actor and director of this episode - what a amazing double play on his part.
However according to the terms of the Academy of Arts and Sciences the eligibility period for THIS years Emmys is from 1 June 2006 - 31 May 2007. So for this to be nominated we will be looking next year... and by GOD someone had better nominate him!
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 10:22AM
dave.birinyi said...
Nitpick Re: #11
Sorkin was no longer with West Wing during season 6. He left after 4.
Reply
6-29-2007 @ 11:31AM
Tracy said...
One of the best shows ever--incredible that they cancelled it. But, hey, we have "Singing Bee" to look for ward to!!
Reply