
(S01E01) Unlike my esteemed colleagues at various print publications, I did not have access to John from Cincinnati's press screener weeks before the show's broadcast. I would have to write my review within an hour or two after watching the premiere with the rest of America. This is all well and good, but I was a little nervous about what I would make of David Milch's latest outing without some time to reflect. I didn't want my commentary to be mired in superfluous comments about how Ed O'Neill and Rebecca De Mornay are looking these days. This series is drawing on an "everything and the kitchen sink" range of literary and philosophical references. It deserves more from me so I prepared by reading everything that was available – namely the script, interviews with Milch and the early reviews.
Little did I know that all this research would just make my job harder. Here's a taste of what our nation's finest television critics had to say about John from Cincinnati:
"A gigantic mess." - Tim Goodman, SFGate
"Shows like John from Cincinnati are why the good Lord made remote-control clickers." - Tom Shales, The Washington Post
"The premiere episode is almost willfully strange and unlikable." - Alessandra Stanley, NY Times
"Watching HBO's surfing drama John from Cincinnati is like sitting through a bad play at a tiny experimental theater. The dialogue is loud pretentious nonsense signifying nothing but the creative dangers of mimicking Sam Shepard, Edward Albee and Samuel Beckett." - Matthew Gilbert, Boston Globe
"I was beyond bored." - Ed Martin, The Huffington Post
Over half dubbed the show "Driftwood" and most referred to it as a "wipeout." The only person who had anything good to say about it was Heather Havrilesky at Salon.com (subscription required) who called it, "a big, sloppily wrapped gift from heaven itself." Robert Abele of the LA Weekly and Maureen Ryan of the Chicago Tribune were willing to give the show a break but not before describing it as "weird" and "self-indulgent."
Man, I wish I hadn't read those reviews beforehand. I will go ahead and admit it. I am a terrible critic. I am, more often than not, on the side of the artist. I will defend an artist's right to fail, even in the uber-expensive medium of television, before I roundly dismiss someone's blood, sweat and tears with a lame critical barb like "wipeout." I will do everything to try and see something from the artist's point of view before declaring his or her work a failure. (Hell, I might even defend David Chase's giant F-U to the audience tonight, but I'm not that crazy.)
Anyway, I know this is a problem. I know that your real friends are the ones willing to tell you that your ass does, indeed, look fat in those pants and that it was the brave little boy not the cowering villagers who cried, "The Emperor has no clothes." Yes, I need to go back to remedial critics' school.
The early reviews of John from Cincinnati have provoked in me a desire to defend it regardless of its quality – out of both some kind of protective mechanism I feel for artists (damaged, beautiful David Milch in particular) and the desire to be a contrarian. "Maybe, you think it's pretentious because you haven't brushed up on your William James as of late, buddy."
So, that's my great big set of quotation marks around this review. I'm going to be fair, but lenient in my assessment of John from Cincinnati's premiere episode. I'm not going to whip out any crappy surfing puns, and I'll try to avoid talking about how some artists, including Milch, just might need the constraints that networks put on them to be truly great. We're just gonna go with the flow and try to take it easy on our formerly drug-addled friends. It's not their fault Deadwood was taken away from us. It's Chris Albrecht's, and his unhappy fate has already been determined.
So, on with the show. Yosts meet John, magical mystery messiah descended from a long line of literature's touched fools. (You know, the crazy ones are closer to God. The blind truly see.) John meet the Yosts, surfing's crumbling dynasty presided over by the especially crumbly Mitch Yost. There are plenty of other gutter poets and colorful losers ambling around the edges - retired cop Bill, Vietnam Joe, Ramon, lawyer Dickstein and lotto winner Barry.
If you're expecting conventional storytelling and easily identifiable heroes and villains, than yes, you will hate John from Cincinnati. You will hate it for robbing us of Deadwood. You will hate it for being confounding and pretentious. Milch untethered from the conventions of the Western (Deadwood) or cop drama (NYPD Blue) is a Milch too far gone. I, however, didn't hate it. While I wouldn't call it a "gift from heaven," I would call it intriguing and compelling and worthy of an audience.
What Milch does so well is give us a set of eccentric lowlifes, burn-outs and hardened hearts all still fumbling toward some version of grace. Tough, forgotten cops fight back the tears over their dead birds. Resentful fathers and their junkie sons apologize to each other for being dicks. And, everyone regales in the innocence of youth and the purity of the wave. Whether the cast is up to playing the inherent complexities of these characters remains to be seen. The strongest performances came from Bruce Greenwood as Mitch, Ed O'Neill as Bill and Luis Guzman as Ramon. Rebecca De Mornay is either brilliant or completely grating as Cissy Yost. I haven't decided yet. It may take me a couple of weeks to wrap my mind around the choices she's making with Cissy.
The dialogue is typical of Milch - rich and foul and loopy. There are some meaty exchanges and thespian-friendly scenes even if they don't add up to all that cohesive of a whole. Of course, that dialogue belongs in the mouths of some more than others. Some of the scenes with non-actors (and De Mornay) feel forced. The uneven casting may grow to be more of an issue for me than the show's unconventional narrative structure.
And, what to make of the miraculous occurrences on Imperial Beach - levitating patriarchs, resurrecting birds and John's magic pants? John's name is John Monad. Much has been made of the fact that "monad" has multiple, but related meanings - the most primal aspect of God, the basic unit of perceptual reality and the indivisible life essence. I'm not sure it matters much whether John turns out to be an alien or otherworldly or just a nut job. He's there to bring the Yosts a little hope, a little cash and, well, we'll have to wait and see what else he has in store. I'm already cooking up a big, crazy theory about monads, marginality and the miraculous, but I'll save that for some otherworldly graduate thesis. For now, I'm in for the ten episode ride... just get back to work on those Deadwood flicks when you wrap guys, okay?
I was going to go with a "I'd enjoy this more if I were smoking..." poll, but I've opted instead to rely on the voices of America's critical community. So, who's assessment do you find on target? (None, of course, is more important than your own. Add your two cents in the comments section. You in for another week? Feel screwed over by both Davids - Chase and Milch - tonight?)












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
6-11-2007 @ 2:49AM
Reveler said...
As a big Deadwood fan I was prepared to hate this show....guess what...... I didn't! It seemed to me that it was vintage Milch. The language and the rhythm hooked me. So I'm prepared to go for the ride and see where the wave takes me.
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 4:33AM
Kurifurisan said...
I'm sure a lot of viewers didn't give the show a fair shake considering the burn from the Chase Bridge at the end of the Sopranos but I took it in stride and gave it my full undivided attention. As a fan of Deadwood I have to say that this was a really interesting show and I can't wait to see if the response matches it's intelligence. HBO needs a strong collection of shows if they intend to keep Sunday night viewers.
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 4:56AM
Bill said...
I'd much, much rather see more Deadwood, but I thought it was interesting enough. Some interesting characters, some funny parts, and the supernatural angle gives plenty to think about for future episodes. I'm not sure it's definitely hooked me for the whole season, but I'll at least give it a few more episodes to see where it takes us.
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 7:42AM
Kris said...
Deadwood should have never been taken of for this! Its garbage!
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 9:43AM
BC said...
First off, did anyone besides me think that the F word was used entirely too much? Can anyone count that high? (seriously does anyone know the exact number?)
As for the show I was confused...I felt they introduced too many characters too fast for a first episode. And I was left wondering exactly what the show is really about? It was very weird....
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 10:09AM
Nate said...
BC obviously you havnt watched Deadwood.
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 10:12AM
Ari said...
seeing Ellsworth made it alright. I'll givr it another few shots.
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 10:20AM
Sam said...
I actually really liked it, but I seem to be the only one. It's one of those shows, like Deadwood actually, where even if you don't know or care much whats going on, the characters are so fascinating to watch.
I also thought the show was best in John's scenes.
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 10:57AM
Adamantium said...
Just after I finished re-watching the entire Deadwood experience id say, moving straight into JFC proved to be worthwhile, while I do read reviews of episodes I have not seen I totally disagree with most reviewers comments regarding the show. It's classic Milch, thats it. Can't wait to watch more eps!!!!!
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 10:59AM
G1ZM0 said...
I'm pleasantly surprised. I love the characters so far and can't wait to see more. My take is that John represents good (God/Angel/Alien?) and Luke Perry is evil. He even called himself a "devil".
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 1:51PM
Wild Bill said...
Deadwood is gone. Let's get over it, shall we?
Now about JFC, I think we have a layered, interesting show about to unfold. I think the first episode did a great job of throwing out a lot of questions with no immediate answers; it should be a fun ride.
It's time to trade your saddles for surfboards and enjoy the ride that JFC is going to provide!
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 2:07PM
cat said...
I can't say I loved it but I was rather intrigued and it all depends where it goes from here on out. I'm going to stick with it and ride it out a while longer.
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 3:28PM
donsense said...
I think Deadwood was the greatest show of all time and that Milch is downright brilliant. Still I was worried. Really couldn't wrap my brain around the first episode after it melted down after Sopranos. So I watched it a second time, and quite enjoyed it even though there were some minor problems. It was quirky, but not cute- I hate cute. I trust Milch enough to have faith he knows where he's going, and I have to give kudos to HBO to produce something with no real precedent. We're going to have to learn to watch this thing and with the glut of tv garbage I'll be happy to do so.
Reply
6-11-2007 @ 8:51PM
kip said...
dude,
we all had to eat the shit sandwich before hand thanks to tony's forgetful sianora. You gotta give the show 4 eps before you can say it bites to be fair.
so sr. milch, you have 3 more tries as we'll let you pass with a mulligan on the first swing.
Reply
6-12-2007 @ 12:37AM
Kevin Kelly said...
I actually enjoyed it. Know what the song was over the end scene and credits?
Reply
6-12-2007 @ 9:31AM
David said...
I was pleasantly surprised how good the first episode was. Though a big Milch fan, I was skeptical about a show set in the surfing world (I'm an indoors-only Jew from NY - what do I know from surfing?!?). I found the show delightfully quirky, and quintessentially Milch. Agreeing with a reviewer above, I was glad to see Ellsworth. I'm not a big fan of recycling actors (I think doing so helped kill Sorkin's "Studio 60") but Ellsworth is awesome.
I liked the first episode a lot, and I'm eagerly looking forward to the rest of the season.
Reply
6-12-2007 @ 10:16AM
kurt said...
Not sure I really care what happens to the characters yet. Deadwood - I was all in from the second I could understand the dialog. Like studio 60 1. I enjoy the past efforts of its creator. 2. Find the writing to be several notches above the tv norm. 3. Had an open mind and put aside the previous work of the creator. Unfortunately, for Studio 60 I never really cared what happened to any of the characters. They were all too strong and confident from the start for me to route for them. Like routing for the $220million Yankees, Go Goliath!! On the other hand, are the characters in John too fragile? Can't quite express the thought but I am not too sure what it is about the characters that makes me indifferent so far. I will keep watching and only hope it can get close to the quality of Milch's last work. At the very least, the dialog is always a treat.
Reply
6-12-2007 @ 11:48PM
Mark Piasecki said...
Song at end credits is "Sun/Rise/Light/Flies" off the EMPIRE cd, by a band named Kasabian.
Reply
6-13-2007 @ 11:15AM
Janice said...
John From Cincinnati is a bit like "Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah" meets "The Soul of Surfing," but strangely I like the combo. I didn't laugh a lot when I watched Deadwood, but JFC had me roaring. The first episode had all the classic ingredients of success, with a complex storyline. The only similarity between JFC and Deadwood is the swearing.... maybe Milch thought we'd miss that the most.
Reply
6-14-2007 @ 12:14AM
gohomejohn said...
JOHN FROM SHITTENATY
Wow! This was beyond unbearable; however, if I had paid for the show, I guess I'd justify the spending by saying "it's pretty good." Thankfully I saw it for free, and I still feel ripped off.
Based on the reviews, people seem to enjoy the program because it provided an ample amount of confusion. My high school chemistry class was very confusing, which is the very reason I never looked forward to going to the next meeting. So I'm a bit confused as to why confusion equates to entertaining. The funny thing is after watching "John", I actually began to long for that chemistry class.
My suggestion for those of you who yearn for confusion: Go to a country where you don't speak the language. . . hours of endless confusion, and far surpassing the level of entertainment offered in HBO's new show.
Reply