(S01E18) If this review is, quality-wise, something less than what you're used to regarding my contributions to TV Squad, please don't blame me. I've been having some personal problems lately and because of them, I've developed a crushing addiction to Flintstone Vitamins. I keep them in a Percoset bottle so no one knows my horrible secret. Sometimes I'll pop two or three just to get through a night's review. And when the web-ratings come in? It's just me, a bottle of Jack, and my best friend Bam-Bam.Now that I've laid all my cards on the table, on with the review...
A few notes before we begin (there's about 500 words to follow regarding some relatively random thoughts about Studio 60. For those of you who find long, rambling blogs "boring," you might want to just skip right own down to where the actual review part begins).
1) I've been noticing that Studio 60 seems to attract an abnormal number of "If you don't like the show, don't watch it"-type comments each week. While I would never tell you guys what to post, it seems to me that this kind of comment really isn't all that helpful. It feels a lot like telling war-protesters that when it comes to America, you can either "love it or leave it." Isn't it possible to love something and wish that it were better? I mean, I'm just going on personal experience here, but when I tell my wife that she shouldn't be mad at me because "she knew I didn't do housework when she married me," it doesn't end the argument. In fact, it actually makes the argument worse. So can we maybe, possibly, accept that most of the people who check this site each week (including your humble reviewer) love the show, but can't help but be cognizant of some places where it needs improvement? And you know I feel strongly about this because I just opened up the door to my wife reading this review tomorrow and using this paragraph to forever justify her nagging my faults ("see, I love you, I just see places where you can improve!")
2) Has anyone else felt that watching the show since it returned is kind of... weird? Since I know that the end is coming no matter what, it makes my relationship with the show complicated and detached. It kind of feels like when you live with a girlfriend and you decide to break-up, but there's still 6 weeks left on your lease, so you try to stick it out till then. Inevitably, you wind up having alcohol (or Flintstone vitamin) fueled sex and wake up the next morning feeling weirded out about the whole thing. At the same time you're trying not to get too excited about it, you're trying to enjoy it because you know that it's going to go away soon. (You have to believe me, this comparison made so much more sense in my head).
3) I pose this question to all you commentators: has anyone, ever, in the history of show business, gotten more mileage out of an impression of Nicolas Cage than Simon Helberg? Near as I can tell, he does nothing else on the show but Nicolas Cage. Is there a record for this kind of thing? Is he approaching the "Famous for being able to impersonate one person very well but for no other reason" Hall of Fame along with Frank Caliendo and Vaughn Meader?
4) I'm losing track of how "meta" this show is becoming. Let me get this straight:
a) It's a TV show about a TV show.
b) The fake network on the show is very similar (down to the call letters) of the real network that the real show is airing on.
c) The main character of the show is very obviously a stand-in for the writer and producer of the show. Oh, by the way, that main character recently started a pill-popping addiction just a wee-bit similar to the writer of the show's own addiction.
d) The West Wing, probably the most famous work by the writer and producer of this show actually exists in this world's universe (as witnessed by the Allison Janney appearance last week). That means it's conceivable that Aaron Sorkin himself also exists. Which means that the final episode, a la Breakfast of Champions, could quite possibly be Sorkin and Matt pairing off for one final philosophical showbiz discussion. I'm not saying that this is the way it will end, just that it could.
e) One big knock against the show is that the sketches aren't funny. Tonight's show pretty much said to the audience, "hey, guess what, we know that the sketches aren't funny! It's a plot point! Take that! Nyah!"
f) Studio 60, the fake show inside the real show, is suffering from ratings problems almost exactly identical to the ratings problems that the real show is suffering from. You have to wonder how many of the panicky discussions about shares and demos and red-states that aired tonight were simply recorded word for word from the actual Studio 60 set!
The show is so meta, I think that if Aaron Sorkin were to sit at home and watch this show air, it has to look a hell of a lot like the scene in Being John Malkovich where John Malkovich climbs into his own head and the whole world becomes a bunch of John Malkoviches (Malkovichi? Damn, where's one of those Spelling Bee kids when you need one?)
All right, now the review. If you skipped right here, you probably did yourself a favor.
Stuff that was good this week:
-- Matt and Danny return! Yay!
-- The interaction between Danny and Jordan, especially when they decided to settle their fight. Only in the Sorkinverse can a guy say that he can't think of a single thing that he was sorry for and have the woman find it charming. Incidentally, I'd love to live in the Sorkinverse.
-- Nate Corddry. Though I sincerely doubt that the line he botched was funny regardless of whether he said "machine" or "blower" and I had serious issues with the ham-handedness with which his brother's hostage situation was handled, I think he managed to pull it off and even had me emoting a little with him at the end of the episode. He's a great and charming actor and I really hope that he finds a soft landing when all of this is over.
-- Lucy Davis's legs. I'm an old BBC Office fan, so sue me.
-- Danny confronting Matt regarding his drug abuse. It felt exactly right in direct opposition to how exactly wrong Matt's assistant's confrontation was.
-- Jenna Fischer as the host. I'm a current Office fan, so sue me.
Stuff that was not so good this week:
-- If all the stuff about the final episodes being an exercise in fiscal responsibility is true, tonight was the first time it showed up on the screen. Their after-party was on the set itself? Really? I'm sure Saturday Night Live does that all the time. After spoiling us by spending money on the front 13 like a drunken Maloof brother, the sudden belt-tightening is made all the more obvious by the previous extravagance.
-- I'm not an expert on ratings by any means, but I'm pretty sure the best way not to get any is to devote a major chunk of dialog to a discussion about ratings. Guys, I'm all about insidery showbizese, but I really didn't want to hear another word about "demos" or "shares." As Casey Kasem once complained: it's ponderous man, it's f-ing ponderous.
-- No Cal!
-- No, really... NO CAL!
-- Seriously, you had a scene in the control room, and you didn't have Cal there! That's like having a porno that ends with the two main characters shaking hands and agreeing to "just be friends."
-- Jack. Remember how earlier in the season he was a network shark that defied stereotype? Yeah, those days are gone.
Stuff that I'm not so sure about:
-- The lawyer. Is she annoying or cute? Is she delightfully and intelligently self-aware or boringly and predictably so? I don't know. I thought the line about her having a "200 IQ" was funny, but I think if someone told me that in real life I'd want to push them down a flight of steps, so I don't know where I stand with her. Either way, I think she could take Harriet in a cat-fight (and if you don't think I'm hoping for that scene to exist more than I am a good result from my MRI on Saturday, then you don't know me at all!)
Question of the week: Do you find yourself less interested in the show now that you know it's ending (so what's the point of getting attached) or more interested (because you have to savor every last bit of Studio 60 goodness)?
For depriving me of Cal and forcing me to sit through nine or ten thousand speeches about ratings, I give tonight's episode 5 Flintstone Vitamins out of 7.
Press Kits Unwrapped: The Prisoner
Ask TV Squad: Eureka, The Prisoner and more!
TV Squad Ten: Cartoon women who should have Playboy centerfolds
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
6-01-2007 @ 1:28AM
MacGuffin said...
I actually thought this week was pretty darn good. Maybe because Matt and Danny were back; in general it showed why the show could have been good.
Hopefully NBC will find another outlet for Sorkin to work his magic. I like his point-of-view and the fact that he is not afraid to tackle tough issues. The show-within-a-show probably was the wrong setting to do it.
Oh well, maybe they could bring back Matt Santos in TWW. God knows we'd like to have an intelligent president back in the White House instead of President Shit-for-Brains.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 1:34AM
Vince said...
I actually had stopped caring for TvSquad since you changed the look and got all weird but if this is the kind of reviews you guys have lately I'm going to start reading it again..oh well maybe just the vitamin fueled ones. Seriously you need more bloggers like Jay.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 2:03AM
kiita said...
I'm taping the show now that my two vcrs now have open program slots after the regular tv season has ended. I'll get around to watching it over the weekend. It's like a booty call.
This review will help me watch it. Love the discussion about the meta-ness of the show!
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 2:17AM
Chris Shifty said...
SNL has never had an after party on the set. Its been at various bars/nightclubs for the past 30some years.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 2:26AM
BigTed said...
Since the show is ending soon, we can care less than ever what ends up happening between Matt and Harriet, Matt and the lawyer, or Matt and his pills. Not to mention Danny and Jordan (though I hope Sorkin doesn't take the easy-pathos route of having a real crisis with the baby). So all that's left is to enjoy the actors and their witty banter, which was this show's main (some would say only) strength in the first place. I agree with the score of 5 for this episode.... But if I thought the show was coming back next year, I would have given it a 3.
But where the heck was Jenna Fischer in this episode? Why bring in someone who everyone loves (and who definitely has a way with witty banter) and barely use her?
As for Legally Blondie, she's just as annoying on this show as she was on "24"... and yet, while I found her icky as the president's consort, somehow in this role she's incredibly hot. I guess smart-annoying is a lot sexier than foolish-annoying.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 11:18AM
mike m said...
Has anyone else felt that watching the show since it returned is kind of... weird?
THANK YOU JAY! I thought it was me! It does feel weird and detached but yeah, I still watch it.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 5:53AM
Bash said...
I still love the show and what I like most is that I know they knew they got the axe and will finish up all lose threads nicely before riding into the sunset.
So why not like them? To go with your analogy: this is like knowing you and your girlfriend will split up but you know it will be on good terms, you will stay friends and you can always re-visit her later this same year (on DVD) and boink the *&%# out of her every time you feel like it ^^;
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 7:35AM
segsig said...
This was an awesome episode! I did have a problem with Matt's storyline, but other than that and no Cal, it was clearly the best balanced show between all the actors having decent storylines. I thought this was finally the episode where they made it worthwhile having the network storylines. Even knowing what was coming in the end (because the promo-monkeys suck and we've seen the big surprise weeks down the road) I was blown away by the writing and acting. Biggest problem, I was so wired from watching it, I couldn't sleep until like 2am!
I would have to rewatch to know which episode it was, but the wrap party was on set at least once before (remember when Jack walked in and Cal screamed for tarps!). It might have been the Wrap Party ep, while Tom was giving the tour.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 8:12AM
David said...
I liked the last 2 episodes. There was less Matt Hariet the bitch crap and less "God sucks" crap.
Last night's episode was fine unti lthe end. The baby isn't kicking! Some random brother will be killed! It was too much over the top and brought back the way too preachy bullshit.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 8:15AM
Jon88 said...
Very gallant of you to skip over the Harriet story (I have to tell Tom, even though I don't have any actual information and there's nothing to be gained by this other than to upset him). Another Sorkinism: plot detours that exist purely to manipulate the audience rather than advance the actual plot.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 8:38AM
Diana said...
I thought it was pretty bad. The flow was off in the 2nd half when they changed gears to high drama.
And Lost is the only show that can get away with the catfight. (in rain and mud no less!) I thought the lawyer was particularly painful this week.
I blogged my review at: http://www.mediaobsessed.com
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 10:16AM
khamel said...
i thought it was terrible for the first 2/3 and then got good at the end. i do think the show has felt weird since it came back, sort of like they knew the end was in sight. 4/7 for me.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 10:53AM
David said...
My problem now is that they knew the show was as good as gone when they filmed these last few, they were not filmed that long ago. The problem I see is how will they wrap the storylines up? Sports Night seemed to be dead in the water and ended with a wonderful season one finale that more TV shows need to follow. It closed off storylines from season 1 and opened new doors to another season.
Studio 60 doesn't seem to be donig that. Whatever happened to the FCC sueing the network necause of sayying "fuck" when being shot at? Whatever happened to the merger and the Chises thing that went with it? To me it seems they know the end is in sight and don't care.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 11:16AM
gail said...
i so relate to feeling weird about watching it
now that i know it's over-sob sob
it's like not being able to turn away from a car crash
i'm still not sure if this show could have been a winner for nbc-why didn't they ever try it in a different timeslot?
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 11:30AM
Mike Harris said...
The West Wing, probably the most famous work by the writer and producer of this show actually exists in this world's universe (as witnessed by the Allison Janney appearance last week).
Yes, but here's where it gets particularly trippy: "The West Wing" may exist, but this world also saw a President Josiah Bartlet — in one backstage scene, we see a "Bartlet for America" sign hanging on a wall.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 11:47AM
John Hewitt said...
This show is like Jerry Lewis. When it tries to be funny it isn't, and when it tries to be serious, it's funny. I thought the "drug addiction" scenes were hilarious. The one with his assistant was like watching two people sleepwalking it was so comatose, and the one between Matt and Danny was so over the top and falsely emotional that I laughed out loud. Plus, Flintstone's vitamins come in individual shapes, and his vitamins were just ovals. I guess the prop people are still on strike.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 12:46PM
RedStarRevolution said...
I do find this show a little weird now, knowing it is definitely coming to an end.
And that gf-apartment analogy was dead on...dead on. Described it perfectly...like you can see it coming, it has a time limit, but you still wanna have a few more go-rounds before you say goodbye for good.
And I'd just like to echo the complaints of a lack of Jenna Fischer. It was a terrible mistake to use her so sparingly, but only because I'm pretty much completely in love with her and want every minute I can get with her on screen.
I ways did find Albie and Tripp to just be an extension of Aaron Sorkin on-screen, and now with the pill-popping addiction, pretty sure that's actually true.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 12:58PM
justin said...
the relationship with West Wing is still confusing me... there's the Bartlet For America poster, which makes you think this is in the same 'universe' as WW... but Allison Janney shows up and they refer to her show, so it's not in the same 'universe'... but the lawyer works for Gage Whitney, the same one that Sam worked for in WW, so it is... oh well - we should treat it like a scifi show and just shrug it off.
i figured out what i think is missing from Danny's role in the show - he needs something more compelling to deal with than a romantic interest with a baby on the way. the character is way too interesting to reduce his level of emotional conflict to handling a whiny young pregnant executive that he's in love with.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 2:57PM
Karen said...
In response to the "if you don't like it, don't watch it" commenters, I would include this excerpt from a review of the returned show in Philadelphia Weekly: "Yeah, Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip is a bad show, but it’s a fascinatingly, mind-blowingly bad show. It’s an entire TV program fueled by one man’s stubborn, egotistical belief that you should bow down at his feet, for he’s a freakin’ genius. Never has something that sucked so hard been so riveting."
Now THAT'S why I watch.
Likes from last night:
--Suzanne confronting Matt (although I thought it went on too long). Also that she told Danny.
--Some of the meta. Seriously: I appreciated hearing that Aaron Sorkin recognizes that his show is getting suck-ass ratings, and that the writing's been bad (as Matt confessed to Danny). Unfortunately, that realization hasn't resulted in better writing.
And hates:
--that lawyer. What a tool. Are we really supposed to find her sexy?
--Harriet, who's supposed to be such a professional, believing (twice!) that it's a good idea to tell an actor in the middle of a live broadcast that his brother may (only may!) be missing (isn't that really his family's job, anyway?)
--Sorkin's exploitation of the war, which is every bit as cheap as that done by the people he decries. Seriously--Tom's brother isn't just missing, he's captured? He's not captured, he's on film on al-Jazeera? He's not just on al-Jazeera, he's been beaten and hoodedby axe-wielding terrorists? Geez, overkill much? At least Garry Trudeau handled it in "Doonesbury" by having a character suffer the more believable--and more widespread--IED injury and amputation.
Studio 60--totally the show I love to hate.
Reply
6-01-2007 @ 9:13PM
justin said...
I loved this episode.
Okay, now that I've been all but written off as a lunatic fan that says that same phrase after every episode, I should say the show was slipping terribly out of control. I've watched that last handful of episodes, but not really enjoyed them. I've Tivo'd them, not watched them live. However, next to the Pilot, this last episode was by far my favorite. After that episode, I'll be impatiently waiting on my couch counting down the minutes to watch next weeks episode.
http://www.nbc.com/Video/rewind/full_episodes/studio60.shtml
Reply