Lost, meet 24. ABC is reportedly considering waiting until January 2008 to start season four of Lost, and then run it straight through May without any repeats (like Fox does with 24). The revelation comes from a SciFi Wire interview with Naveen Andrews, who plays Sayid on the series. Andrews said, "I believe that's the plan."This is probably a better plan than what Lost did this year. We only got to see six new episodes, and then the series went on a 13-week break. Ever since its return last month, Lost has lost 1-2 million viewers. It could also be the move to the 10 pm time slot that dinged the ratings.
The interview also reveals how Andrews feels about the direction of the show. Without getting angry or too specific, he basically says that he thought the first season was awesome, but he's not so hot on the subsequent seasons. He says he'd sure like to see more Sayid in the show (wouldn't we all?!?). About the writers, he says, "It's their choice to do what they want with that show, and they will." He sounds mildly unhappy, doesn't he?















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-28-2007 @ 5:29PM
Wil said...
I wouldn't be too quick to assign Lost's decline in viewers to the 13 week gap; the show's quality has plummeted this season, with countless episodes that do nothing to move the story forward, poorly-written flashbacks, and enough red herrings to fill a hatch which will be discovered and destroyed.
I'm just one of the viewers who gave up on the show, but it wasn't because of the break, it was because the show I loved in season one and occasionally enjoyed in season two turned into something entirely different in season three.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 4:59PM
RedStarRevolution said...
Sounds like Naveen might not want to be on the show much longer...maybe a death in the works?
I might be partial to this outcome, as while I think Sayid is a great character, it seems as if his story has been told.
Also, I have him in the Lost Death Pool, but we'll leave that aside...
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 5:06PM
Alex said...
Good.
It's very dumb for network to do this whole "split season" schedule. Look at Commander In Chief, it was one of the most highest rated shows on Thursdays before they did a split season. Then it got canceled because of ABC's genius scheduling.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 5:15PM
erroneous_nick said...
I'd much rather wait longer for the premiere and have a non-stop run than what they did this year. I'd even prefer it over the currently all-too-common practice of: "Show a few new episodes, then a few reruns, repeat until the viewers get pissed."
From a standpoint of personal preference, I'd like to see more Sayid...and Locke, Hurley, Jin and Sun. I still like Sawyer/James, but I'm tired of Jack and Kate.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 6:27PM
Darren said...
They need to make the season longer, as in do 10+ more shows per season, that way they don't need to split the season or start in January. TV season starts in September NOT January!
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 5:32PM
sam hage said...
this is old news, they confirmed this a while back in a podcast.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 5:41PM
Curt said...
Then you've missed out on the last, what, four great episodes Wil. Sure it went through a slump with the 6 episodes of season 1A, but dammit if they haven't been hitting 'em outta the park since they came back.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 5:56PM
Porchland said...
The last half-dozen episodes have been as good as any in the whole first three seasons.
I wonder if the flashback format will have to adjust if the show runs more than one more season. The back stories on Jack, Locke, Sayid and Kate have all pretty well played out.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 6:10PM
MacGuffin said...
I would support a move to a later start date as long as S04 was completely uninterrupted. Hell, we've waited forever for The Sopranos to return and they've had the weirdest start dates. If it is a quality show, you will have an audience.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 6:37PM
Televinita said...
The thing is, I expect to be entertained from September-May. I can handle 3 weeks in between each new episode when it's not sweeps (isn't that how MOST SHOWS on network TV do it?); what I can't handle, or at least what causes me to become disenchanted, is going months and months without ANYTHING new to discuss about this show at al.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 6:54PM
Akbar Fazil said...
Well Darren and Televinita, the face of television is changing.
When you have a show that is so tied to previous episodes (just like Lost and 24) you can't have such huge gaps in the storytelling. Lost Season 2 would have been alot more successful if it actually ran together with no breaks.
If you need to do breaks in a serialized drama, do it with an equal amount of time on and off. In the off time, show the exact same episodes again in the proper order.
Reply
3-28-2007 @ 7:01PM
Roger Rees said...
I'd love to see both Lost and Heroes follow 24's lead and start in January. I just wish that 24 or Heroes would move to Tuesday so that we'd have a solid TV every night. 24 on Monday, Heroes on Tuesday, Lost on Wednesday, EarlOfficeScrubs30Rock on Thursday.
Reply