Lost will be returning after an unbearably long hiatus on February 7th, and I couldn't be more excited. All the anticipation has gotten me thinking about the elements that have been missing from my TV viewing these many months. Dexter and The Wire were excellent distractions, but Lost has always brought a certain unique something.
Here are the five things I've missed during the Lost break:
1. The Jack-Kate-Sawyer Love Triangle: After months of longing looks and kisses that went nowhere, some actual progress was made when Kate and Sawyer got it on in the polar bear cage. To complicate matters, Jack was watching courtesy of the Other-cam. For once I actually cared about this romantic conflict, and there were no new episodes in sight! I can't wait to see what happens next to our favorite trio.2. Ben Linus: Nobody does creepy like Michael Emerson. With my beloved Eko gone, Ben is easily my favorite character on the show. Yes, he's probably evil, but many of the great roles in TV history have been villains. Characters like Stringer Bell, Gaius Baltar, and Evil Marc from Ugly Betty make fabulous shows even better. I am looking forward to some awesome post-op Ben scenes in upcoming episodes.
3. Random Stuff: While other shows are stuck operating within the confines of reality, Lost is free to throw in random elements at will. I've had far more "Huh?" moments watching this show than any other. That's part of the fun of Lost--you never know when a polar bear or a guy with an eye patch might appear. Top that, Grey's Anatomy!
4. Eye Candy: There may not be a shortage of gorgeous characters on TV at the moment, but Lost has one of the most diverse offerings of hotties around. Whether you like shirtless wonders, mysterious bald men, or former hobbits, there's a guy for you. The women, while fewer in number, certainly have the Gilligan's Island ladies beat in the looks department. Sorry, Ginger.
5. Lost Message Boards on Thursday morning: There is no substitute for the enthusiasm, obsessive attention to detail, and downright crankiness that one encounters on a Lost message board after a new episode has aired. Lost fans love to compare notes, and the results are often informative, hilarious, and (occasionally) a little scary.
In the words of The Office's Andy Bernard, I can't wait to "get my Lost on." In the meantime, feel free to share your own thoughts about the hiatus in the comments section below.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-24-2007 @ 3:48PM
Squishy said...
Dexter and The Wire are well acted, well written intelligent shows. It's belitting to class them as little more than distractions. Lost doesn't deserve to be uttered in the same breathe as such finely crafted, well thought out pieces of entertainment. Its like saying Britney Spears is in Tori Amos' league.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 3:59PM
Akbar Fazil said...
Wow, a lost basher in the first comment. That didn't take long.
Well Squisy, I watch Lost, Dexter and the Wire and consider them all well acted, well written intelligent shows. They are all just different and approach things in a different way.
Has Lost had a few episodes that seem to lag? Sure, but then so has Dexter and The Wire. Every show does. Even the my highly exalted Battlestar Galactica has had it's downs. Even the wonderful Firefly in its 15 episode run had a few stinkers.
Oh, and to the powers that be, thank you for getting the login system enabled. No more email confirmation is wonderful!
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 4:09PM
Hugeliver said...
You forgot creative writing and the knack to keep the audience interested. Something it only had in Season One!!
I for one will NOT be watching. I could care less any more.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 4:33PM
TVblogger said...
I've just missed the excitment leading up to the week's show. It'll be nice to have Lost back in my TV watching schedule.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 5:15PM
innamorata said...
I'm with Squishy.
Lost is nowhere near the quality of shows such as Dexter (though this one only had one season so it's obviously not creatively tired, pointless and non sensical as Lost is), The Wire and Battlestar Galactica.
Honestly I have not and still do not miss Lost and wish it gets cancelled sooner rather than later.
It had an average first season story wise that was mostly saved by the acting and production values but as a whole it is not entertaining to me.
ABC's shows certainly redefine the term overated imo.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 4:58PM
Borat said...
"Has Lost had a few episodes that seem to lag? Sure, but then so has Dexter and The Wire."
Call me a fanboy but I have been watching season one of The Wire again and I can only say one thing about it: "perfect". That show is in a class by it's own, and I am a bit offended (not really) by someone calling it a distraction. There is not one insignificant moment on that show.
Btw, is Gauis Baltar really a 'villain'?
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 5:11PM
Squishy said...
I dislike Lost for what it became, but it's not like I don't have just cause or easy fodder, particularly when the show could once have been comparative. Case in point, I don't like any show that strings along it's audience with endless unanswered questions (many of which haven't been resolved from as far back as season 1 - and no "give it time" is not a answer it's an evasion). Not to mention the bumbling hacks behind the show who are beyond all reproach or apology for missteps they've made along the way. Lost is its own cliché, it makes endless fun of itself without realising it. If what you love about the show is its endless meandering with soapy overtones, interwoven with horrid dialogue and dawdling pace then have at it. By all means enjoy it, but to confuse this show with anything nearing the shows to which it has been compared is insulting.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 5:19PM
SamMalone said...
I've missed decent conversations on morning radio shows following a new Lost episode. Recent topics have included how annoying it is when someone your talking to gets a string of saliva between the lips, and something petty about one of the crew going to a wedding when the other didn't, ugh.
I've also missed expecting that "everything will change next week".
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 5:18PM
Erin said...
Huh--It's as though #5 is being demonstrated right before my eyes (especially the crankiness)...
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 6:11PM
Will said...
I've never been to a LOST message board, but I think I'll give them a try after the show comes back.
I've never really thought of Baltar as a villian. I'm assuming you're talking about the one on the new BSG.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 6:54PM
RSL said...
I think the random stuff for me is the best. The stuff that gets my brain just pumping full of crazy, conspiratorial ideas. I don't think any other show has ever "turned me on" so much. I'm seriously jumping around with energy by the end of every episode. A Pentecostal church should want such fervor.
@ Squishy, Hugeliver, Innamorata: Thanks for clearing us all up about how you hate Lost. We were all wondering.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 7:39PM
Sean said...
I think that a mistake some viewers make with Lost is thinking of it as a mystery story, when really it's a suspense story. Now, lots of suspense stories have mysteries that the characters unravel, and lots of mystery stories have suspensful portions, but there's a key difference: In a mystery story, everything builds up to the big reveal; the bulk of the story is setting up the clues and mysteries that lead to the big payoff when you learn what's really been going on. In a suspense story, however, if there is a mystery, it is there simply as a means of generating suspense, since things can often be more tense and fear inducing if you don't know what's happening. Unless you're going for full blown surrealism, there must be an answer to the mysteries, but that's not really the point; it's just there to justify the suspensful scenes along the way.
Take the movie Psycho as an example. There's a long scene at the end where a detective/psychologist explains why Norman Bates did all those crazy things, but that was just the denouement; the real climax was when you see the skeleton in the wheelchair and Bates attacks that woman dressed as his mother. Psycho wasn't meant to be the mystery of what's going on at the Bates Motel; it was a suspense story about some gruesome murders, unusual happenings, and general chills and thrills. The same goes for Lost. It's not really about figuring out what the Island is or solving the mysteries (though I trust the Lost writers will give us those answers); it's about the tension, suspense, and character developement those mysteries create.
I think that's why some people get so frustrated with Lost. They approach it like a mystery story, where dragging out the big reveal is a huge problem, as that's really all people are watching for; without the reveal, the story has no point. I approach Lost like a suspense story, however, where the journey is what's important, and the longer you go without answering the questions (and the more questions you pose) the more mileage can be gotten out of the story.
Not saying everyone has to enjoy Lost, but a lot of those who don't seem to want it to be something it was never intended to be.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 8:25PM
RedStarRevolution said...
We better all stop bitching about the long hiatus, because its getting ABC thinking they are going to go with season 4 STARTING in January, leaving us all Lost-deprived for months on end, instead of different 3 month long spurts.
Lost seems to have turned into this real love it or hate it kind of show, and its too bad, because all of the 'hate it' people are, in the majority, ex-fans who don't have an ounce of patience to wait for an intricate, slow moving story.
This show is all about the big picture, and everything we have seen so far is to fill in the edges of that picture. The end game is something that will blow our minds and hopefully pull it all together (Or I will just have to kill Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse for wasting countless hours of my life)
Two and a half weeks till us 'love it' people can get their Lost on again...
BTW, Haters, why do you open a Lost article, write a comment, sign into your inbox to activate that comment...just to bitch. If you're done with the show, have quit on it, then quit, and shut the hell up so those of us that stuck with it can have a discussion about it. Jeez...
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 9:53PM
Jeff said...
Hmm... misread that one bit as "you never know when a polar bear with an eye patch might appear".
Now there's a twist worth waiting for.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 11:47PM
Phish said...
i love lost.
(testing the password sytem)
Reply
1-25-2007 @ 12:00AM
Laz said...
First off, RedStar, "Shut the hell up" is taking it a little too far, no? Former fans have as much rights as casual viewers and diehards to comment on the show. Besides, it's not like this edition of "The Five" was insightful enough to spark an actual conversation. 2 of the five entries ("Random Stuff", "Eye Candy") apply to about 95% of television. Posts like this make me wonder if TVSquadders get paid per post.
Secondly, to all the hardcore LOST fans out there, as a formerly addicted fan who is now little more than a casual viewer, it is quite frustrating to be repeatedly told that my losing interest is a result of my own impatience. I don't assume that you continue to watch because you haven't figured out how to change the batteries in your remote, so please don't assume that I have the attention span of a goldfish.
I think Sean (#12) is on to something. I think much of the frustration of former fans comes from the LOST on TV being different from the LOST they thought would be on TV. Though I was much more interested in a character drama following the plight of a group of crash survivors on a mysterious-- possibly supernatural-- island, the LOST I see on TV is more action/adventure LORD OF THE FLIES meets ISLAND OF DOCTOR MOREAU, that's actually *not* what turned me off the show.
Personally, I feel that the show has taken a group of intriguing characters, killed a third of them, made a third of them annoying or just ignored them, and focused on relatively uninteresting combinations of the remaining third. Meanwhile, all the characters are nothing more than pawns in a big "What is the mystery of the island?" game and their personalities are rewritten as necessary to provide for sweeps week confrontations or bogglingly silly filler episodes. I write this without bitterness, just the understanding that LOST is a show I thought I would love. It turns out it is merely a show that I watch.
Reply
1-25-2007 @ 4:04PM
Danny said...
I just don't understand people who decide to stop watching a particular show, yet continue to read blogs about it and still comment on it.
I stopped watching CSI 2 years ago, and have not read 1 blog about it since. Why would I? If I no longer like watching the show, why would I like reading about it?
Oh well, to each his own.
Reply
1-25-2007 @ 7:53PM
Karly said...
Definitely I can't wait for the return of Lost. I have to disagree about the Kate-Sawyer relationship. It has got to go downhill for Lost to stay interesting and there is a nice blog I read on that in http://lost-spoilers-blog.blogspot.com/ . Personally I've gotten "Lost" on after the show on Wednesdays, but with the move to 9:00 this season and now to 10:00 it's going to become a Thursday morning matter. I'd rather see lost at 8:00 to give time to discuss right after the broadcast for most people.
Reply