You know, as much as I shouldn't write about the seemingly disgusting post-Screech life of Dustin Diamond, every little sordid detail that comes out demands that I say something about it, if only to point out all the unintentional comedy bubbling just under the surface.Today, Rush & Molloy of the New York Daily News, who broke the story about a leaked sex tape featuring Diamond, interviewed David Hans Schmidt, who brokered the deal to distribute the video. Schmidt is saying that Diamond is in on the deal -- he even produces a document with his signature -- and is angry that the ex-child star is telling people otherwise. He also doubts that people see all of Diamond in the video. ""I have reason to believe that is not Dustin's [manhood] in the movie," he told the gossips. Heh. "[Manhood]." I wonder what word he actually used? I bet it wasn't "Peepee" or "Weiner". If anyone wants to guess, you can do so in the comments.
[via Pop Candy]















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-09-2007 @ 12:35AM
Curt said...
"I have reason to believe it wasn't Diamond's purple-headed yogurt slinger..."
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 10:49PM
David said...
He used the "woman's" weiner. Yep, I went there.
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 10:51PM
Arc|Angel said...
I guess no one cares :)
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 11:46PM
V said...
Try the word, "Integrity"...
Reply
1-09-2007 @ 3:45PM
Ellie said...
A couple of years ago against my better judgement, I read an interview with Dustin Diamond where he very proudly said that he had taken a roll of vicodin and waved it under Matthew Perry's nose, taunting him with it, before offering him some. Matthew Perry walked out rather upset at this, and Dustin Diamond didn't quite understand why, despite someone telling him about Perry's problems with the drug.
So when I read stories like this, and the efforts that DD is making just to keep himself vaguely in the headlines, it fills me with a sense of schadenfreude, I must admit.
Reply
1-09-2007 @ 8:13AM
Chris W said...
*Clears throat*
Wang?
Reply