(S01E10) If there's one identifiable theme that has weaved its way subtly through this first series of Robin Hood, it's The Crusades.Even the untrained eye wouldn't fail to notice the repeated references to the war in the Holy Land and the odd nightmare suffered by Robin and his sidekick Mutch as a result of their experiences at war.
The omnipresent spectre of at-war King Richard as a yet-to-be-seen plot device, combined with the modern-day parallels of trouble-at-home being blamed on a futile war in the Middle East serve the audience's sub-conscious as this adventure series trundles towards its end-of-year finale.
This week, the presence of a troubled Crusader and a Turkish Prince seeking a truce placed Robin, Marian, Guy and the Sheriff on the back-burner as a tale of skewed ethics occupied centre stage.
It's all the more surprising to find a pseudo-Middle Eastern political theme in Robin Hood when you learn that the producers deliberately left out the Friar Tuck character for fear of introducing an unhealthy religious aspect to the series.
However, the way in which The Crusades is often casually mentioned without explanation tends to nod a wink at our own ignorance over events in Iraq and Afghanistan and easily provides the writers with a safe path through the murky waters where such topics tend to lead.
So, when Robin's men discovered a Crusade veteran being persecuted by the local villagers, they took the risk of caring for him and seeking a cure to his nightmarish ills, and introduced the possibility that the audience might be in for a little more than the usual grab-and-chase fare of recent weeks.
All the while, a guest in Nottingham Castle awaited the arrival of Prince John to broker a peace treaty, unaware that the Sheriff was actually holding him hostage. Unfortunately for the Sheriff, the Prince's father had no intentions of paying the ransom for his son, and had sent a suicide squad to seek him out and kill him.
And I'm afraid this is where the plot slightly derailed itself, both in terms of the distasteful notion of suicide attackers from the Middle East descending upon an English stronghold, and in the quite ridiculous transformation of the Crusader veteran from a bug-eyed PTSD sufferer into some kind of sabre-wielding ninja.
If I didn't have something invested in this show in respect of providing the TV Squad readers with some form of analysis on its progress, I would probably have switched off and played solitaire on my PC.
I've enjoyed recent episodes of Robin Hood much more than the earlier openers, but the cracks are starting to widen in the overall plotting of this show, with a severe lack of detail in any kind of over-arching theme and the constantly stifling locations of Sherwood Forrest and Nottingham Castle providing the only vehicles upon which the repetitive plots ride off.
This week's episode topped it off, with a sound enough premise, topped off with a stupid excuse for entertainment when Robin and his gang put aside their differences with the Sheriff to defeat a gang of female swashbucklers.
News of a second series being commissioned by the BBC really doesn't give me any hope that we might see more continuity in the storyline when this show returns next year, since the producers clearly haven't even bothered plotting the current series with an end game in sight.
I hope I'm wrong, and I hope the next three episodes can provide some sort of rounding-off to this otherwise B- action adventure.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-14-2006 @ 6:42PM
mike m said...
This show reminds me more and more of Hercules or Xena. That being said, I'm not saying it's a bad thing.
To make a quick correction, the Prince was Saladin's Nephew, not his son.
I think that the show is really hitting its stride. Each week, Robin and his merry men must deal with the sheriff and his not-so-merry men with Marion always being caught in the middle(though I suspect a cliffhanger at the end of this season). Is it inconceivable? Yes. Is it silly? Of Course! But to me, that's the beauty of the show. Historically, it's tied in nicely as well to boot.
Hercules and Xena were just as wacky, just as silly, and much less historically accurate considering their many forays into the introduction of religion into the "mythical gods" centered shows.
Should Robin Hood be better than those shows? I'd argue yes. But if it chooses to go the route they went, I'm sure they'll do just fine.
Reply
12-14-2006 @ 7:05PM
forzaq8 said...
i think they went a bit far with the female ninja troop
entertaining yeah but kinda screw the historical picture they try to draw
one thing i don't like about the show , the affirmative action they try to do
they add a east Asian actor to represent east Asian in Britain
and they had the episode with the master of the guards
i don't think any colored guy at that time period would get a job like that
Reply
12-16-2006 @ 4:49AM
Bo Link said...
Mike, I agree with your comment about this being similar to Hercules or Xena. I never watched those two shows consistently, but I can see the resemblance here. I'm just not sure the producers can do too much more since the realm of Robin Hood was confined to Sherwood Forest and Nottingham. Maybe they could show some flashbacks of Robin in the "Holy Land" to set the stage for something more than just the tattoo conspiracy theory. I might also like to see something with Robin in Nottingham before the Crusade started. The more ideas and storylines the better.
Reply
12-17-2006 @ 5:10AM
loxley said...
I watch this show mainly to laugh at the historical innacuracies and awful costumes.
Sometimes the offered viewpoints scare me though. The female ninjas are just ridiculous and obviously so, and that I can live with.
It's the stuff about the crusades that bothers me.I think the writers should read a few IMPARTIAL BOOKS written by accredited historians.The series makes it sound as if England and England alone, has got into cahoots with the pope,to go and oppress some peacable muslim people.There were many other European kings involved in the crusades beside Richard,and the crusades took place as a response to a call for help by the emperor of Constantinople who saw the formerly christian countries of Egypt,Syria,Turkey etc all being invaded by muslim leaders using fire and sword. There is no good or bad side in the crusades.
The othher real gripe is using people of african descent in a 12th c setting,without any explanation.I think that is so patronising to black people,just as I have always found it patronising that you now supposedly have to have an 'ass kicking' female to attract female viewers.
Reply