After catching the latest episode of Veronica Mars this past Tuesday, I was sort-of left feeling empty about how things ended. It just seemed that there were some key elements I've been used to seeing in the previous big mysteries solved, something that made me think "ah ha!" when looking back at previous evidence. After reading comments last week from some observant commenters, it all becomes clear now ... and it's pretty damn cool.Here's some details that maybe you found easily -- maybe you didn't:
- The picture with Mercer and Moe. When Veronica sees the photo of Mercer and Moe together there's an important detail I missed the first time around: what they're wearing. Mercer is dressed as a soldier, Moe as a prisoner. Hm, where did we see that before? Oh yeah...
- The prisoner/soldier experiment with Wallace and Logan. Poor Horshack was completely abused by one of the solider students throughout the weekend, though when the experiment is over we see several times how Horshack is strangely befriending his previous torturer. This can only mean one thing...
- Stockholm Syndrome. From Wikipedia: "a psychological response sometimes seen in an abducted hostage, in which the hostage exhibits loyalty to the hostage-taker, in spite of the danger (or at least risk) in which the hostage has been placed." And who's a classic example of exhibiting this odd behavior, someone outside the Veronica Mars universe? The one an only...
- Patty Hearst. Like one commenter pointed out, she wasn't cast in this show just for the fun of it -- it was a clue! Patty Hearst is famous for how she was kidnapped and then actually turned around to help the kidnappers rob a bank. And someone else on Veronica Mars besides Horshack showed this behavior...
- Moe. Remember that earlier in the season Moe said he also performed in the prisoner/soldier experiment, saying it "changed his life." Now go back to the first point and look at that photo, then recall that Moe called Mercer "sir" at one point and Mercer called Moe "prisoner." Click! It all fits together now!
Something else I wanted to mention here is my disappointment that Rob Thomas may be considering nixing the idea of season-long (or semi-season-long) mystery arcs, hoping the show would appeal to more audiences. Rob, what about the rest of us? Can't we all get along? Those mysteries are what we talk about at the proverbial watercooler every week -- what would we talk about if there's no continuing mystery to guess about several times a season? I don't care about the reasoning, I just hate the idea. Isn't the evidence I listed above enough to prove how cool these longer arcs are?















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-01-2006 @ 11:33AM
Andrew Liptak said...
Holy crap, things just clicked into place for me!
Reply
12-01-2006 @ 11:59AM
kerry said...
I knew Moe had to be involved from the very beginning, simply because of his creepy ritual of offering a cup of tea to every girl who walks onto his floor. Also, as the only guy who works for the safe ride car service on campus, he sticks out as someone who's trying to find inebriated girls to dose with his "tea." Once he mentioned he was in the prisoner/soldier experiment it seemed pretty locked-in that he was part of the rapes, if not the main offender.
Reply
12-01-2006 @ 12:03PM
Fred said...
I think nixing the season-long arc was the best move the show could have made. Last year, they over-extended themselves, and I thought the resolution of the story was less than satisfying. Ongoing mysteries can only take you so far, after all. It's what drew such a big crowd to "Lost" in the early going, for instance, but it's also what's driving them and most potential new viewers away.
There's a big difference between chopping the season into arbitrary self-contained parts -- as in, "Here endeth the campus story. We shall never speak of this again." -- and choosing to tie up certain threads before they threaten to overtake and undermine the show.
Lily's murder hung over the first season, but it was never *about* that, and I think the biggest weakness of the second season was when it became *about* the bus crash -- and less about Veronica and those around her. I think this, so far, has been the show's best season.
Reply
12-01-2006 @ 12:26PM
Charles said...
Wasn't it mentioned a few episodes back that Horshack committed suicide? Mmmm research time...
Reply
12-01-2006 @ 2:05PM
Toby OB said...
Charles, I'm probably wrong on this, but as I remember it - Horschack was caught cheating on a test and that it was his jailer who was helping him. That turned the Stockholm Syndrome relationship on its head and which I think helped keep us from guessing the Mercer/Moe relationship too early.
Reply
12-01-2006 @ 2:15PM
kerry said...
Toby -
Actually, Horshack and Rider Strong (his "jailer" in the prisoner/soldier experiment) were kicked out for cheating because Horshack was doing two tests, one for him, one for Rider. They had the same abuser/abused relationship as Mercer/Moe.
Reply
12-01-2006 @ 4:02PM
Jeff said...
I understand why rob thomas and some fans want to get rid of the season long arcs, but they add an element of danger and suspense that the show would otherwise lack. The mysteries of the week are good, but watching a detective find out who cheated on a test doesn't compare to murder or a serial rapist on loose.
Reply
12-02-2006 @ 12:31PM
Smiley said...
I've got another article idea for you. How about you explain how you discovered that Locke on Lost is bald.
Reply
12-01-2006 @ 9:32PM
Fred said...
So do you really think the show would be better if the campus rape storyline -- which began last year, remember -- continued until a big reveal in the season finale? Because, honestly, I don't think the show can sustain that kind of thing, and I think it distracts from the more interesting character development that goes on in each hour. I agree the show loses something if it's just the Mystery of the Week -- just "Veronica Mars: Girl Detective" -- but that's not what's going this season, at least from where I'm watching. The serial rapist was on the loose during those smaller day-to-day mysteries, like who cheated on a test or who was cheating on their husband, and I doubt that finding out who the rapist was will offer a neat and tidy resolution.
And hey, now we have a murderer on the loose for the second part of the season! That's dangerous, isn't it?
Reply
12-01-2006 @ 10:31PM
Meg said...
I think the mini-arcs is the best way to go. I feel like the season-long mystery is difficult to sustain, but if there isn't an overriding arc of some kind, all we have is the Mystery of the Week, and those can get repetitive and boring, especially when Veronica has no particular emotional investment in them.
Reply
12-02-2006 @ 3:20PM
Fred said...
SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT! This season we discover that Locke really *isn't* bald! I know. Blows your mind, huh?
If you're trying to say that Keith's observations were obvious, then I don't agree. While I think you can enjoy the episode and arc without making those connections -- I missed them the first time through -- I also think Keith makes some interesting points.
Reply
12-04-2006 @ 11:25AM
Laurel said...
Season-long arcs are not a bad thing. They have never been a bad thing until Lost came along and did a horrible job with them. Lost's season-long arcs are really just long-cons where everybody gets screwed in the end.
But comparing Veronica Mars and Lost is apples to oranges. Think apples to apples and compare Veronica with Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
Let's recall that amidst Buffy's week-to-week slayage there was always a long story arc: the Master, Angel, the Mayor, Adam, Glory, etc. All of these season-long stories gave the gang a sense of mystery, direction and purpose. Killing random vampires (or in Veronica's case, solving random crimes/mysteries) is only going to be interesting for about 2 episodes. If executed well and in the right format, long-arcs are what keeps an audience coming back for more season after season.
Reply
12-11-2006 @ 10:39PM
bluekidcory said...
I think it'd be better if the arcs weren't planned at all. They happen, but they overlap and end at different times. I personally love the long mysteries of Veronica Mars and still find it amazing how everything from the beginning to the end all piece together and even include some past season stuff as well. Keep the arcs, but if you like, make them sparatic.
TOODLES
Reply
1-14-2007 @ 3:00AM
becca said...
I just started watching this season and immediately ran out and bought the last two. Personally I love the show but think that this season has had trouble because the big mystery wasnt directly connected to Veronica. Lillys death and the bus crash were immediately very personal to Veronica.
Reply