I tend to have very little patience with new television programs. I usually give them two or three episodes and then I tune out. I did that for Desperate Housewives during season one and I still don't regret canceling my Season Pass to that show. And now, this fall, I am doing it once again. I get all giddy over new shows that I think have a great premise, and then I get bored quickly. Apparently I can't handle more than 5 seconds of bad television. Here are The Five: New shows that are already getting old:
5. Heroes Just like Keith, I am not at all floored by this series. This week's pilot wasn't all that captivating and that's too bad because it's a freakin' brilliant idea for a show. The original version of the pilot, which was cleaned up a bit for air on Monday, was disjointed and hard to follow. It was also slow, which is what I fear for future episodes (which Keith say kinda suck). I really want this to be a good series. I am trying to will it to happen, but it's not looking good and I am quickly losing interest.
4. Jericho This was one of the few pilots that I didn't get to see before the fall television season began. Again, I liked the premise: a small town is cut off from the rest of the country after an apparent nuclear attack on major U.S. cities. But the execution was deplorable. The pilot had so many cheesy and stereotypical scenes (angry mob!) that I found myself rolling my eyes over and over. I'm so sorry to say this, because writing for a weekly show can't be easy, but it was all so vanilla. The characters' relationships with each other were so uncreative. I actually groaned when I saw the previews for the second episode, and I promptly canceled my Season Pass.
3. Standoff How can this show sustain an entire season? Are there really multiple hostage crises in Los Angeles each and every day? It felt like the entire series was played out in the pilot. Not even the alluring power of Ron Livingston can get me to tune back in. I keep seeing promos and they just look like the same episode over and over.
2. The Class I thought the pilot for this new sitcom looked promising. I actually laughed out loud once or twice and I liked the premise of how all the characters came together. Then, I started to watch the second episode. Sadly, many of the actors on the show over-act. It's like they were giddy to be picked up after the pilot or something. Anyway, the timing was off during the second episode and the jokes just didn't seem as funny. I turned it off halfway through and I'm pretty sure I won't watch it again. I may soon make a personal rule not to watch sitcoms.
1. Justice I can't even begin to explain how happy I am that Justice is being put on hiatus. You see, I adored the pilot. Yes, Victor Garber is a bit much to handle, but I liked his brash character. My favorite part was the end where we get to see how the crime actually occured. Yeah, that was cool for, like, two episodes. And now I'm over it. We're only three episodes into the season and already it feels formulaic. I'm still reviewing the show for TV Squad, which is the only reason I don't hit the little curly button on my TiVo remote and skip to the end to see how the crime was actually committed.
Runners-up: Smith, My Name is Earl












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
9-27-2006 @ 10:25AM
SJ said...
I only disagree with you on one show: My Name Is Earl. Sure, it's not a "great" show but it varies from good to very good. It's a show which does just enough for me to tune in each week.
Plus, I think the biggest problem with dramas on network TV is the 22 episode requirement. The best dramas on TV have mostly been on cable (excluding Lost, 24), and I think the major reason is that there are only 12/13 episodes. 22 episodes must create a lot of pressure on writers, and imo even Lost would benefit greatly if it was only a 13 episode per season show.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 10:42AM
erroneous_nick said...
Over the years I've adopted a 6-episode rule. If I decide to start watching a new series, I give it 6 episodes to pull me in and if it hasn't after that half-dozen attempts, I stop watching. A lot of shows take longer than just two or three episodes to get their footing and I've been rewarded by showing patience with some shows. Unfortunately, I'm more often disappointed, but I still think a bit more patience is worthwhile just so I don't miss those potential gems.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 10:49AM
Cee said...
Wow. I think you guys are becoming more and more critical every year. Come on ... I thought Heroes was freakin amazing. All the people I spoke with also thought it was amazing. I think you guys are falling into the professional movie critic hole where your job as critics becomes so big that you can't really enjoy anything that much. All you see are the flaws.
No offense to Keith, cause I'm usually a big fan of his, but I don't think it's fair to be so negative and trashy of future episodes of Heroes. It's just one guys opinion and it may ruin the experience for many many fans of the first episode.
How about sticking to reviewing shows that already aired and maybe softening up on the critical part of your jobs.
(I mean come on ... My Name Is Earl??? Would you rather ten years of Till Death or Happy Hour??, Earl is awesome!)
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 10:55AM
Brian said...
Thank you Cee, your comments sum up my growing experience/observations here also.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 10:58AM
Fred said...
I dunno. For my money, "Heroes" and "Jericho" were two of the best I've seen this season. I really enjoyed them both and am looking forward to the rest of the seasons. I also really enjoyed "Smith," and "Kidnapped" but we'll see how long that lasts. (I've only seen the first episode of each.)
I thought "Justice" was okay -- the cast is good, and the show looks polished -- but watch it every week? I just couldn't bring myself to do that. I fell out of love with it pretty quickly, like I did two years ago with "Desperate Housewives" and last year with "Bones." I watched the first few episodes of the latter this season. And while it's good, it's also a lot of the same week to week. (I can take formula -- I mean, I really like "House" -- but a show's got to do something with it.) I'm worried the same thing might be happening for me with "Lost" and "Prison Break" as well.
I thought "Men in Trees" was nice, but I'm not sure I want to invest the time into it. I think I've missed an episode or two already. Then there are the few others I haven't yet watched, like "Shark" and "Runaway." I'll have to see if I think they're worth the time either.
"Standoff" really didn't appeal at all. I think the cast is great, but it looked like something that could get very formulaic very fast.
However, the only show I know I've *definitely* stopped watching this year is "Vanished." Man that was lousy. (I mean, I've seen worse, but last year I made the mistake of giving "Reunion" two episodes. Not again.)
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 11:01AM
Justin said...
Wow Anna (and to a certain extent, Keith).
If you can't take television and are getting jaded with this line of writing, you really shouldn't be working where you're working any longer. There are those with much more passion who are able to appreciate and discern good television shows from bad ones.
And I have to say that the TV Squaders have been showing some disgusting attitude these days. If you guys are worn out, don't take it out on the shows. You can talk about the trajectory of the shows but don't flat out dismiss them. There are people who take your opinions seriously and you have the responsiblity to give opinions that are well thought out and not just blogged out like it's a personal site to rant on.
Now I know, you guys dont' respond to those who are critical of your pieces, but I just had to say my peace about the declining standards on here.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 11:09AM
ooda said...
Of all the new shows, the ones I'm lukewarm about...
Smith: Generic, and it still tears me up we have this instead of Thief.
Shark: Generic, but might have enough to keep me watching.
Justice: I'm still watching, and somewhat liking, but it's more of a "I'll watch it if it's on, but it's not something I'd Tivo".
Heroes: I feel like I'm supposed to like it because of the buzz, but it's cheesy and generic, and I'm still yet to feel compelled by the story.
Help Me Help You (I'm a psychology major, so this one kind of grabbed my attention): Generic, kind of funny, but seems somewhat okay. I'll give it two more episodes.
That said, this fall season is one of the better ones for a while. Studio 60 is simply amazing television, and I have high hopes for Dexter.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 11:20AM
ooda said...
Side note, for me, while I like the show, and do find it funny, Scrubs is getting generic (or it's just becoming more obvious), and unfulfiling to watch. Even worse is when they try to inject drama into the show, which just feels out of place. I can't comprehend how people give Scrubs so much credit, yet shows like It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia go relatively unnoticed.
It's fair for people to be hostile to Heroes, as it has been getting a free-ride lately, and for some of us, it wasn't all that great. Mind you, the acting is better than Lost, which is why I gave up on that show, but it was a pretty lackluster episode, personally speaking.
The Jericho pilot was bland and generic. Worth watching to see if it improves, but really, nothing special, and filled with too many cliches. That said, visual wise, it was great.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 11:33AM
mike said...
Disagree with Heroes. Very interesting premise.
Agree with all others.
Time to add Studio 60 to that list. I feel like I've seen that show before. Oh wait, I have. It's the same formula used in Sports Night and the West Wing.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 11:40AM
Cee said...
Here is good news for Heroes fans ...
http://hollywoodhotline.typepad.com/watcher/2006/09/the_overnights__7.html
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 11:40AM
KateG said...
I just read on Reuters that Tim Minnear is joinging Standoff as consulting producer. I think that's very good news. And Ron Livingston will keep me watching.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 12:25PM
FP said...
I havent only seen a few of these shows, and I find that the problem is this: too many dramas tracking the "Lost" model. It forces the viewer to watch every minute of every episode, or else feel (ahem) lost, and fatigued. So if you pick up 6 or 7 of these shows, its like reading 7 Tom Clancy-sized novels at once. (this is true of 24, but it often works as standalone episodes, since "previously on 24" gives you the essentials... e.g. theres a bomb/jack's undercover/his boss is a dope/his treo is better than mine).
I loved the Smith pilot. But I watched 10 minutes of episode 2 and felt that I could not invest in another "novel", not without giving up Lost, The Wire, Battlestar Gallactica, or something else. And I won't give those up.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 12:34PM
MosquitoControl said...
Saw the last 20 minutes of Heroes last night, meh. I don't see any reason to commit time to it. Maybe when the DVD comes out.
But your description of Standoff (Ron Livingston has a show?!) sounds like House to me. I saw six or seven House episodes this weekend, for the first time. Man, is that show repetitive.
Someone comes in either with seizures or spitting up blood (out of any orifice).
House comes up with some extreme diagnosis.
One of the three other doctors says it is Lupus.
Patient gets worse.
House changes extreme diagnosis.
One of three doctors says it is Lupus.
House says Lupus does not advance this rapidly.
One of three doctors (alternating) has moral issues with House's decision.
Patient gets worse.
House changes extreme diagnosis.
One of three doctors says it is still Lupus.
House almost kills patient.
No one looks in a book.
House considers it may be Lupus, decides against it, almost kills patient again, figures out what it is.
One of three doctors has extreme moral issues and goes behind House's back, almost kills patient.
Family gets angry at House.
House saves patient.
Everyone laughs and says "House is never wrong, we should always believe him!"
Repeat.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 12:41PM
Fred said...
I like novels for television. More, usually, than the alternative. I want to be actively involved in whatever television I watch. I almost never, for instance, just watch to see what's on.
That said, I can understand not wanting five to ten novels all at once. (I could feel a little fatigue settling in myself last year, even with just "Lost"). The brain -- to say nothing of the television market -- does have a saturation point. And the truth is, for a lot of people that point is pretty low. Me, I don't necessarily mind having to watch every episode. Lots of people, however, do.
Which, *that* being said, is sort of a shame. Because I think a lot of these are novels worth "reading". I'd like to give them all a chance. It's just...well, I have a life and a job and things I'd like to do besides watch television. I feel like I'll *need* to give up on some of these, if only to be able to do those things.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 1:08PM
Karen said...
Well, I'm not a television writer, and I don't consider myself a particulary jaded viewer, but I am 100% in agreement with Anna & Co on both "Heroes" and "Jericho." In both cases I was really looking forward to the series because the premises were so fantastic, and in both cases I was really disappointed in the execution. I think people can dislike shows without it meaning that they're either jaded or elitist. Or arrogant. Or whatever. We don't all like the same stuff--that's life, people.
The big eye-roller for me in "Jericho" was the emergency trach--oh, geez, AGAIN?--but I agree the whole episode was chock full o' cliche. "Heroes" was simply slow-moving and disjointed. Lots of shows manage to introduce a lot of disparate characters without letting the seams show quite so obviously.
I haven't seen the other three shows in The Five, but as far as I'm concerned Anna's on the money.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 1:19PM
kip said...
I agree with Standoff and Justice and I'd like to add the unit as well. I'm pretty sick of dramas that have some sort of ending in each episode. Is it too hard to see that not havign a season long story line as well as time line is ineffective? 24 did so well with a season long theme that it surprises me other shows don;t try to emulate iwthin reason(the whole alias rimbaldi will forever leave a bad taste in my mouth as hopw they jumped the shark with a ddesperate idea that was so ungodly protracted.) I think the 9 will show this next week to be true as it plays out. I like the Unit and Standoff and I feel that if they pulled a longer term plot rather than the complications of dating someone from work that it woudl be better. The same could be said for studios 60's f buddy premise.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 2:10PM
Tracy said...
I agree with you on all of them except Justice - I still like it. Except they have *got* to have the team either defending somebody who turns out to really be guilty and/or losing case soon or it *will* be one note.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 2:16PM
Fred said...
Hmm...just when a lot of us seemed to be thinking there were maybe too *many* shows with season-long or open-ended stories...
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 2:25PM
RG said...
Ok, I really respect your views, but come on some of these shows you've only seen once!!! You can't get tired of a show that you have only seen once, or twice even if you ask me. To say you have grown tired of Heroes, Jericho, and The Class is just plain silly in my book. If you just don't like these shows ok, but that's differant from growing tired of a show. I can understand you saying your tired of Justice, maybe even the Standoff. But I really don't see you giving the other shows a chance. And to crow the fact you gave up DHW after only five shows of the FIRST season does not make me give alott of credit your choice to drop shows.
I'm tired of the networks canceling shows before they ever really got started. 'Grey's' was not the ratings champ it is now when it started. I say give shows a few viewing before writing them off. Unless they are a total mess.
Reply
9-27-2006 @ 2:40PM
allen said...
We don't have an arbitrary number of times we will watch a show before we give up or commit to it. It's pretty organic.
My wife liked Heroes a little more than I did, ergo, thumbs up.
I liked Smith enough to commit to it for a while longer, so, Season Pass.
Jericho.......ugh....it's opposite something my wife likes and I just won't fight for it.
Studio 60. It doesn't suck. It isn't good. It's like watching the 5th season of the West Wing. I felt obligated to it, but I knew it was just a shadow of it's former self. Note to Sorkin & Co.: Dump Steven Weber's character as unceremoniously as you did Moira Kelly's on WW. Also, get Hirsh back in there. Seems like he would be the perfect kind of person for Brad or Matt to consult with as a father figure/Leo McGarry mentor. And he would make for great TV.
What I find fascinating about 60 vs WW (and let's face it, they are cousins) is that, while WW took place in the very insular world of the executive branch, leaving the claustrophobia of the white house rarely but, occassionally, S60 seems MORE claustrophobic than its predecessor. The smartest thing they did was keep the look and title font from WW because it FEELS like I've been watching it for 7 years.
Other than that, boy howdy, what a fucking disappointing season. Sitcoms that aren't funny. Dramas that fail to make the grade.
I find myself longing for the days when Reality Television held my interest.
Now, that's new shows.
Old shows that we had committed to that we adored (kinda)?
Desperate Housewives. After a sadly inept second season we were really hoping that Wisteria Lane would return to it's 2004/05 juice. Alas. This is just garbage wrapped in a soap opera with double takes and smarm. I think my wife is watching it out of habit now.
House. I usually play poker while she watches, come in at the third commercial for a recap and watch the end.
Gray's Anatomy. More of the same. Which is more of...the same.
And that's it. We have found Amazing Race, Project Runway, even Wife Swap to have more interesting inherent drama, enough to keep us interested.
Moody TV does not make for interesting television.
Reply