
(S01E01) This, by far, is the most disappointing new show of the season.
And it pains me to say that, because I like J.J. Abrams and I like stories with lots of characters set in New York City, but this show starts with a concept that turns out to be pretty damn bogus to start with and then does nothing with it.
Here's what's wrong with it.
The opening narration (and ABC's relentless ad campaign) wants to remind us that this show is all about the strangers that we meet on the street everyday. They could become our best friend, they could have an impact on our lives. We just never know what's going to happen when we meet a stranger. Um, excuse me, but isn't that the plot of pretty much every show when you get right down to it, and even about life in general? This whole "six degrees" angle the show is taking is just a gimmick. It's really just set up like any other soap opera: a bunch of random characters with different professions and personalities who end up interacting with each other. There's absolutely nothing new about it.
Which would be ok, if they gave us something to be interested in, but we've seen all of these characters before: the hot girl on the run from someone, the defense attorney with a heart, the tough business woman looking for more in her life, etc, etc. Really, the only character you have an interest in is Campbell Scott's photographer with the messed up life trying to do something for his son.
As if the whole "six degrees" and "fate" thing wasn't so forced down our throats, they also have to throw in coin flipping and a Magic 8 Ball that Scott gives his son. Gah. And the part with the business woman finding a random photo that Scott took while on a jog. In any other show, that would be called "contrived," but because this is high concept and it's all about FATE and SIX DEGREES OF SEPARATION, it's supposed to be dramatic. It isn't.
So, let me summarize: a bogus concept, lame writing, and a bunch of characters you really don't care that much about. You look at a show with tons of characters like Studio 60 or Lost and you see how great writing and direction/editing can introduce them beautifully and really hook you into the show.
But this show isn't Lost. It's just lost.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-21-2006 @ 11:49PM
Babs said...
I could have told you where the black charachter was going when he was first introduced. In an industry that sorely underrepresents minorities, is it too much to ask that the black characters not be criminals? I grew up in the inner city, have never have been arrested, done drugs, and manage to hold a job and pay my bills. I guess having a character that represnts me is too boring.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 12:55AM
Dorv said...
I would argue that the only thing that was contrived about the show was the characterization of Damian, like Babs mentions before.
Yes, these are character archetypes we've seen before... But seriously who was the last completely original character on Television? I would have said John Locke until we discovered he's just got "Daddy Issues." So, what does that leave us... Alf?
I just got done watching it the first time around, and I can't say exactly why I loved it, but I know that I did.
Maybe its because I always identify with the "relatively" uncool guy that makes good with the hot girl.
Maybe I'm just a romantic at heart and, even though I've never had that 'great loss' I identify with Laura.
To be frank, I only gave this show a chance because of JJ Abrams and Erika Christensen, but I'm glad I did.
Bob, you and I normally agree, and I do agree with you on one point. The show had would could have been a great premise, how our lives are affected by so many people we will never meet. I could have gone a couple of episodes before any of our characters got to meet each other.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 1:26AM
Mela said...
I agree with you 100% - I sincerely thought the concept for this show was an original one with the 'hope' that fantastic writing would pull off another big hit for ABC......
But as I watched and counted how many minutes I wasted away on poor writing, I said humm this is it??? And this show was after the brilliantly written Grey's Anatomy.... I couldn't believe it especially with a heavy hitter like JJ ......
This is a huge disappointment and I know for certain my desire to see how these 6 individuals connects next week should have been the opener of the show...
Slow timing, predictable acting and oh yeah that cooooooooookie cutter suspense tag of see what happens next week.....
Lets see how fast this get's pulled from the line up?
Does JJ have a chance with ABC politics??? Ratings game is just that, a ratings game, if ABC is smart they would dump it now, cut their loses and hope to pray no one remembers this loser as a reflection on the other good shows that are still hot on ABC....
Mela
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 1:39AM
jake said...
they should have given the time slot after grey's to the new series Men in Trees -- which is better written, better acted and a rewarding series (judging from it's great 2nd episode). Catch it fridays at 9.
Anyway, maybe 6 degrees will get better as the episodes go on. I actually thought campbell scott's character was the least likeable.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 5:39AM
Jonny Rice said...
I'm with Jake. Should Six Degrees not improve and find itself with poor ratings, give Men in Trees a shot to shine on Thursdays. Thematically, it would fit much better post-Grey's than it currently does in its hell-hole Friday night spot.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 7:52AM
tv junkie said...
I was confused throughout the show, i might give it one more shot next week even though that ending with Whitney's fiancé kissing that other woman was downright stupid and predictable. Very disappointed. And I agree with you guys that "Men in Trees" is a much better fit with "Grey's," it was such a surprising delight, i thought it would totally sucked (like last year's Heather Graham disaster) but Anne Heche is actually really good in it.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 9:55AM
SamMalone said...
Soap Opera seems like a good way to describe this show. I can just see the show 5 episodes from now, with every character re-acting the same dilemna, is the fiance the man of her dreams or a scoundrel, she'll never know.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 9:56AM
Jimmy M said...
You meantion the stupidness of the opening narration?
I changed the channel 3/4 the way through the opening narration. I was planning to watch the whole show but after that I was neither interested nor impressed. Switched over to ER.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 10:16AM
maria said...
I completely disagree. Every show has to start from somewhere and i thik that it should be given a try. I happened to think the beggining of the pilot was a little drag but it had me after that. I look forward to future episodes. And regardless of how ppl bash JJ Abrams you can never call his writing anything but amazing. This show is basically a more grown up Felicity with more intense storylines, but i like it.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 1:04PM
LadyBristow said...
The only role J.J. Abram's has in this show is that he's the executive producer. I didn't see his name anywhere in the writer's credits. So the only thing you should be blaming him for is paying for it and bring it to ABC, as it was originally a WB pilot.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 1:08PM
k said...
the only highlight = hope davis
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 5:10PM
Karen said...
I had thought that with Campbell Scott AND Hope Davis (wow--was Parker Posey not available? That would have made it the perfect indie project) it would have been great. But...not so much.
Bridget Moynahan kept confusing me--she looks too much like Veronica Hamel from "Hill Street Blues."
But she won't be confusing me for long, because I doubt I'll keep watching.
Reply
9-22-2006 @ 5:20PM
Kelly said...
I loved it. Its television, remember that. Its your entertainment for the hour, and it did the job for me.
Reply
9-23-2006 @ 12:07AM
Chris said...
Seems like most of you are upset with the way its marketed by ABC, not with the actual show itself. I liked it a lot. There seems to be a great balance between the characters and the stories similar to Lost. While some shows lean towards the characters and have no plot or story, and some lean too far into the story without addressing the characters, this one has both. I look forward to more episodes.
Reply
9-23-2006 @ 12:20AM
Tony C said...
The absolute strongest emotional point for me in this episode came from Laura (Hope Davis): In the opening, we get a brief glimpse of her watching TV, looking perhaps a bit pensive, while a news correspondent in Iraq reports a segment from the war front.
We still don't know a whole lot about her, but she appears to be getting over her husband. There's a few hints along the way, like her conversations with Whitney, when she packs up his suits and gives them to Goodwill, and when she removes her wedding band. Though nothing that quite explains the situation.
And then, later on, she's watching TV again (briefly interrupted by Mae) and I'm thinking "Didn't we see this before?". It hit me like a bolt, just before she hit the rewind button, and I couldn't stop the tears. That's when I realized that she was playing back a recording of her husband's last broadcast before he was killed in Iraq. The final piece of her puzzle.
Reply
9-24-2006 @ 10:23AM
Anthony said...
I disagree. I think the show was entertaining, and I immediately got sucked in with these characters. With JJ Abrams behind it, and actors like Erika Christensen and Jay Hernandez, how could you go wrong? Needless to say, I love how it is filmed on the streets of NYC unlike other shows that are all filmed in the studio. I am already looking forward to next week's episode!
Reply