Yes!Whoa. I'm getting ahead of myself here. And, really, I was asking your opinion.
After visiting with CBS viewers in different cities, anchor Katie Couric says viewers are hungry for more, in-depth news and information. The big three networks all have 30-minute newscasts and, unfortunately, an hour-long newscast is unlikely because that extra half-hour of network space makes some decent cash with syndicated programming. You have to go to cable news or public television to get that.
Although, cable television is evidence that an hour-long newscast doesn't necessarily mean you'll get any in-depth news and information. Thirty minutes is such a short amount of time for so much news that it's super dumbed down and, in many cases, stories are generalized in order to get everything in.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-15-2006 @ 12:44PM
TVGenius said...
Funny how that was one of Dan's sticking points with CBS before he left... he wanted to go to an hour.
I'll stand by my original proposal for CBS's revamped news... an hour anchored by Shep from FNC.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 12:54PM
erroneous_nick said...
People still watch network opinion, er, news?
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 1:11PM
miche1le said...
Please spare me! Most of the time I can't take a half hour of network news. Too biased and one-sided...
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 1:17PM
Myron said...
Are there enough pills to ask your doctor about to support a full hour?
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 1:24PM
NoLifeMcGee said...
The best way to do a full hour is PBS's "NewsHour with Jim Lehrer." Ten minutes of news summary, then 40 minutes of in-depth analysis on the day's top stories. It gets you quickly up to date, but it also informs you far better than any other news program in the country.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 1:32PM
Vince said...
They don't have a clue on network TV.
What they should do is showcase the indepth stories they have available on the web. "ABC This Week" is doing some of this by offerring "expanded" versions of the TV show on the web.
On the web they can narrow cast the news to select audiances with tailored ads (less mass market pill ads!)
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 1:47PM
Scott H said...
An hour of network news would not mean more in-depth coverage; it would just mean more time for sensational stories and celebri-tainment. The networks already have hours of what used to be newsmagazines, and look what a swamp those have degenerated into. Voodoo, star interviews, ambushing child predators, digging up lurid old murder cases, etc. Why would they treat this hour any differently?
60 Minutes excepted, of course. Although with Hewitt gone, it seems like they were doing more celebrity interviews than they used to.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 1:52PM
Kevin M. said...
FOX local news is an hour.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 2:09PM
doc said...
"an hour-long newscast is unlikely because that extra half-hour of network space makes some decent cash with syndicated programming."
Shouldn't that be that the half hour after the network news is usually used for local news, where the affiliates make some decent cash? That's how it works in my neck of the woods anyway.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 2:43PM
Bob Jones said...
How many people have access to regular TV stations, no internet and no cable/sattelite?
I can't imagine the people who can not access the web or 24 hour cable news is large, so 30 is enough for the big networks.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 3:06PM
Chris Rose said...
To "Doc" (#8):
Depends on the city/time zone, but here in NYC, local news goes til 630p, the national news is 630-7p. And the syndicated crap is from 7-8p. Prime starts at 8p.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:26PM
doc said...
Thanks Chris, that clears up the confusion. Here in Seattle we have local news from 5-6, national from 6-6:30, local news frmo 6:30-7, and syndicated junk from 7-8. So, reading Anna's post I assumed that the extra national news would take up the 6:30-7 local news spot.
Reply
8-16-2006 @ 1:56AM
Brent McKee said...
In Canada we've had an hour long national newscast on the CBC for about 25 years. Admittedly this is seen at 10 p.m. local time rather than the early evening (that goes to local stations) and on the whole it has worked quite well. The first half hour or so is what you'd probably describe as standard news coverage, but the second half hour has been in depth coverage of particular news events, sometimes with one story taking over the first half hour. It's not a bad idea although recently ratings have declined for the broadcast (in part because of a ruinous strike at the CBC last year).
Reply