When I sat in on the NBC conference call for the show
Heist, I was probably the only person on that call who hadn't seen it. In fact, I had absolutely no idea what
the show was about... besides some sort of heist, of course.But as reporters from around the entertainment journalism landscape politely asked stars Dougray Scott and Steve Harris their questions, I started to figure out exactly what this show was going to be like. There was going to be a team of expert thieves, each with a specialty; they were going to plan a big heist that's funded by smaller heists; there was going to be a cat-and-mouse game with the cops with some romantic entanglements; finally, there was going to be goofy lines and lots of people not taking themselves too seriously.
How'd I get this off of one conference call? Two words: Oceans Eleven.
Oh, no. As soon as those words came out during the call, I knew this was going to be a problem. Not that I didn't like Clooney, Pitt and company, but I just didn't want to see this on TV for a dozen or so episodes. I just thought the formula wouldn't work over the long term of a series. And the first fifteen minutes or so of Heist wasn't convincing me otherwise.
Mickey O'Neil and James Johnson (Scott and Harris, respectively) are veteran robbers who scheme and plan their heists out to the hilt, making sure, for instance, they trip the alarm three times on a targeted jewlery store so the cops stop responding. Then they hit the store with brute force, blithely discussing Mother Theresa's wavering belief in God as they break in and rob the safe. So, yes, I get it, these two have intellectual lives beyond grand larceny; this is just a job to them. Yawn.
Then they gather the team to set up the big score: a hottie, a dipshit, and an old guy. The old guy (surprisingly named Pops) seems to be good at stealing cars, but we don't quite know what the other two specialize in just yet. But Mickey tells them of the biggie... rob the three biggest jewlery stores on Rodeo Drive during Oscar week. The expected take? Half a billion. Lots of quips, lots of sassiness. Double Yawn.
Then you've got the cops: Detective Amy Sykes, who's in charge of Robbery and Homicide in her precinct, who's smart, determined, and a little bit troubled (she shoplifts razors in a supermarket as Mickey scopes her out). She's surrounded by a fat bumbling racist cop and his black, much more dedicated partner. Triple Yawn With a Neck Droop.
But y'know what? The show started to suck me in a little as the heisters tried to get a little cash by glomming onto the crude robbery scheme hatched by some "foreign" (read: Arab) terrorists: send a pizza guy in with a bomb strapped to him and if the cops come, blow the sucker up. Remember, not only are the heisters doing smaller capers to fund the biggie, but O'Neil and Johnson are also trying to scout "the enemy," too. And Amy's smart... perhaps too smart, even for the audience. Note this IM exchange with my boss Keith, who watched a preview of the show a few days ago:
Keith: OK, how did they know the cars would be held back by the woman cop? Did they just hope she'd figure out what was going on and call for the cars to all stop, so they'd lost the tail? That bugged me a lot.
Me: That could have been a nice coincidence.
Keith: They lost the helicopter easily. But how'd they know the cars would be gone?
Me: Maybe they reasoned that there was a reason why the cab left when the cops came.
Keith: Well I had a thought... The plan all along was to learn about the woman cop. To figure out that she'd be the one assigned to burglary and then to learn how she'd think. That first burglary was to do that.
Me: Maybe.
Keith: Since they didn't get anything out of it at all. Just that totem, which he left on her bedside table.
Me: I would guess that's why they did it.
Keith: That's the only explanation that worked for me.
Me: The cat and mouse game...
So the writers might be a little smart for their own good in setting this scenario up, which will play out over the course of this season. We'll see. I'll give it another episode and see if I want to continue. I hope Dougray's accent gets better by then, because his Scottish burr is seeping through in his speech, which has been Americanized for some reason. Also, there are some side plots, like a betrayal suffered by Mickey, which need to be explored. But, they just need to ease off the quippiness a little bit. It's just not necessary.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-23-2006 @ 10:18AM
gt said...
agree with all the yawning! rolling my eyes, ffing thru the middle. luckily i watched the last heist, which was entertaining, but required me to buy too much bunk. sorry, cant buy that much bunk when i'm all spent on lost and 24 and prison break.
Reply
3-23-2006 @ 11:17AM
Tammy said...
I always give a show at least two or three episodes because pilots are usually crap. They want to introduce all the characters and their back stories in one little episode. Lead guy, trying to hard to be Clooney.... Love Harris but this seems beneath him. Still, might as well give it one or two more episodes to see if once they got the green light to do a series they improved on the show. Much better than Evidence anyway but that's not hard to do.
Reply
3-23-2006 @ 2:34PM
ap said...
I didn't find it at all tedious, though I agree that some of the plot came off a little too tangled for its own good. And poor Scott should've been allowed his natural accent (for the listener's enjoyment, if nothing else), though I agree with Tammy -- gotta give new shows at least a few eps to get themselves well sorted. With Liman involved I daresay it'll pull together well
Reply
3-23-2006 @ 3:24PM
Richard said...
This was the worst written show I've ever seen in my life. Can we find out who writes this so I can know to avoid anything else they are ever involved with?
The plot had holes but it wasn't that bad, the actors are ok, but the characters lines just make them all sound like the same moron with different accents.
Reply
3-23-2006 @ 3:39PM
Susan said...
Hmmm...crime shows (CSI, CSI, CSI, Law and Order, Law and Order, Law and Order,), hospital shows, or reality shows? I taped Heist because I thought "Wow, is this something different?" A friend caught a few minutes of it and thought it was BBC America because its dialogue is actually witty. So, while I found a few holes in the storyline (which on a Big 3 program is right on par-seen CSI, CSI, or CSI lately?), the dialogue had me from "Overdose, plane crash, overdose, and underdose."
Warning: You have to the ability to comprehend witty humorous dialogue without a laugh track or pauses.
Oh, and the Ocean's Eleven I saw had Frank Sinatra, among others, in it. Oh My! That means the one with Clooney and Pitt was a remake. How unorignal.
And, seriously, are Armenians Arabs? And terrorists? I totally missed the Arab terrorist thing. I thought those guys were just a mob type gang planning a sick, yet based somewhat on a true story, bank robbery.
I'll be tuning in again.
Reply
3-23-2006 @ 5:29PM
Gonzo said...
It seems a much more direct ripoff of Hustle from the BBC which has recently been airing on AMC and blogged about here than Ocean's 11. It's almost a character for character match between the two shows as well as the cat and mouse angle.
Reply
3-27-2006 @ 7:57PM
Mark cullen said...
I created the show with my brother and hope you all give it a couple episodes. To the accusations of "This is like "Ocean's Eleven" or like another show -- It's part of a well traversed genre. What we're trying to do over 13 episodes is to have you get to know these characters.
Some of you picked up on some of the things we're trying to do, others didn't want to invest and that's my fault. It's my job to entertain you. Believe me, it's hard to get what you want and what the network wants into 40 minutes. It's a constant struggle. And, for the guy who didn't like the writing -- We wrote the show "Lucky" which was a critical success and for which we received many awards. So, if you didn't like the pilot I ask you to give the show one more chance, I think you'll be happy you did.
mark cullen
Reply