Find your next home with Luxist's "Estate of the Day"
AOL Television

Cancel Arrested Development!!!

PRINT| E-MAIL|MORE
260arrested_development.jpgYou've heard the rumors. Emmy for Best Comedy, Golden Globe for Best Actor, WGA Award for Best Episodic Comedy - all of that be damned, low ratings deserve to be punished. And so Fox is probably on the cusp of cancelling Arrested Development. After all, as David Cross helpfully pointed out on The Jimmy Kimmel Show last month, Rupert Murdoch could make a lot more money off of a hip reality show like America's Cutest Retards. Here at TV Squad, we have just one thing to say about that:

"Good Riddance!"

Yeah, that's right. You heard me - we don't want shows like Arrested Development sullying our beloved network. Face it, FOX - nobody wants to watch a character-driven comedy. We want traditional sitcoms that take place in living rooms. With couches. And lazy husbands and hot wives and mean-spirited children. Either that, or procedural dramas. Lots of them. Anything with forensics, you just keep coming. Reality is good too - let's have more of those shows where attractive people eat bugs and poor people fight for prizes. In fact, just put those two shows together - make some hot bug-eating chicks fight over an unemployed factory worker, and then give the winning couple a makeover and a dream house. Then give us a shocking twist. Give us anything, as long as you take away Arrested Development.


We expected more from creator Mitchell Hurwitz - he is, after all, the man that brought us Golden Girls - and no one knows better than executive producer Ron Howard how well tried and true formula works. And yet, they expect us to watch a sitcom without a laugh track? It's like, every single line is potentially funny, and some of them are funny in three or four different ways - how are you suppossed to know when to laugh? They can't all be jokes ... right?  And even if they are, what are you suppossed to do? Watch the thing over and over again to glean jokes that flew past you the first time? It sounds to us like Arrested Development wants to reward viewers who are smart enough to remember old details and have the tenacity to careful pay attention to new ones. That's elitist. We don't like that.

In addition, the "scenes from the next episode" that appear at the end of every Arrested Development installment never actually appear in the following week's episode. This is not only extremely unprofessional, but it's just plain rude to promise something that you have no intention of delivering. I have personal testimonials from dozens of viewers who have been seriously traumatized by this cruel ploy on the part of the producers of Arrested Development - they're trying to get people to tune in the following week for scenes that aren't even there! Why would they trick us like that? We here at TV Squad don't like to be tricked. We don't think you do, either.

Arrested Development is a non-traditional, genre-bending, richly layered and intellectually  complex character-based comedy. Plus, there's a character named Job, but they spell it GOB - and that's just blasphemous.  For all of these reasons and many more, we think Arrested Development must be cancelled. Shows like this make us work hard, and that makes our brains hurt, and we don't like that. We don't need Arrested Development, and we don't want it.

Join us, America, in mobilizing the effort to rid our television screens of such dangerous material. The sooner we get this thing off the air, the sooner we can all sit down, relax, pop open a cold one and bask in the soothing rhythms of America's Cutest Retards.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 6)

Featured Stories


meet the tv squad

Categories

RSS Feeds

Powered by Blogsmith

TV Squad on Twitter

Twitter @tvsquad

follow TV Squad on Twitter

AOL TV's Top 5


More Features


watch full episodes online

TV Squad Newsletter

Get TV Squad's daily posts emailed to you daily. Sign up now!

.

Sponsored Links

Most Commented On (7 days)

Blog Roll

Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in: